Literature DB >> 2803117

Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques.

M Tos1, T Lau.   

Abstract

The late results in 740 patients with cholesteatoma subjected to one-stage canal wall down mastoidectomy (262 patients), modified canal wall up mastoidectomy (324 patients), and tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy (154 patients) were analyzed with regard to hearing and the condition of the drum. Mean observation time was 9.3 years, range 3-21 years. Postoperative hearing (air bone gap and pure tone average) and as hearing at the last evaluation was significantly better in the canal wall up group, than in the canal wall down group, but also the preoperative hearing was better in the canal wall up group. The postoperative hearing was best in the group with tympanoplasty only without mastoidectomy. It is concluded that no single method is optimal in all cases of cholesteatoma and that cholesteatoma surgery should be individualized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2803117     DOI: 10.1016/s0385-8146(89)80038-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx        ISSN: 0385-8146            Impact factor:   1.863


  12 in total

Review 1.  Surgical anatomy and pathology of the middle ear.

Authors:  Jan Christoffer Luers; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Five-year postoperative outcomes of modified staged canal wall up tympanoplasty for primary acquired cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Masahiro Komori; Naoaki Yanagihara; Jun Hyodo; Ryosei Minoda; Yasuyuki Hinohira
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Sultan Şevik Eliçora; Duygu Erdem; Aykut Erdem Dinç; Murat Damar; Sultan Bişkin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A Comparative Study of Outcomes and Quality of Life in Canal Wall up Mastoidectomies and Canal Wall down Mastoidectomies.

Authors:  Lisa Abraham; Ajay Philip; Anjali Lepcha; Ann Mary Augustine; Suma Susan Mathews; Roshna Rose Paul; Manju Deena Mammen
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-09

5.  Applicability of autologous incus: the influence of age and localization of cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Milan Stankovic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Cartilage ossiculoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: hearing results and prognostic factors.

Authors:  N Quaranta; S Taliente; F Coppola; I Salonna
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Audiological Results of Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis with Cartilage Shoe Technique.

Authors:  Hacı Kaplankıran; Mehmet Emrah Ceylan; Gökçe Aksoy Yıldırım; Gözde Ceylan; Abdullah Dalğıç; Levent Olgun
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-01

8.  Hearing Outcomes According to the Types of Mastoidectomy: A Comparison between Canal Wall Up and Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Min-Beom Kim; Jeesun Choi; Jae Kwon Lee; Ju-Yeon Park; Hosuk Chu; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong; Won-Ho Chung
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Obliteration of Radical Cavities and Total Reconstruction Procedure Without Staging After Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy: Long-term Results.

Authors:  Shao-Cheng Liu; Chih-Hung Wang; Bor-Rong Huang
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 10.  Results of endoscopic middle ear surgery for cholesteatoma treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Presutti; F M Gioacchini; M Alicandri-Ciufelli; D Villari; D Marchioni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.