Literature DB >> 28031051

The status of Her2 amplification and Kras mutations in mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

Kuang-Leei Chang1, Ming-Yung Lee2, Wan-Ru Chao3, Chih-Ping Han4,5.   

Abstract

Jayson GC et al. remarked in Lancet that nearly 100% of mucinous ovarian cancer cases have Kras mutation as well as a high frequency of Her2 amplification. Using the Abbott PathVysion Her2 DNA Probe Kit and Kras mutant-enriched PCR Kits (FemtoPath®), 21 samples of primary ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinomas from Taiwanese patients were examined to determine the status of Her2 amplification and Kras mutations. Our results showed the Her2 amplification rates were 33.33%, while the Kras mutation rates were 61.90%. We present here our results in order to enlighten the readership that the ~100% Kras mutant frequency and the high Her2 amplification rate reported by Jayson et al. may be too exaggerated to be applicable into all populations. Additionally, we report another 2 novel Kras mutations (A11V, V14I).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Her2 amplification; Kras mutation; Mucinous ovarian carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28031051      PMCID: PMC5192568          DOI: 10.1186/s40246-016-0096-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genomics        ISSN: 1473-9542            Impact factor:   4.639


Main text

We read with great interest the work by Jayson et al. in Lancet (Oct. 2014). The authors presented a comprehensive review of outstanding quality. They remarked that mucinous ovarian carcinoma has a nearly 100% human V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (Kras) mutation as well as a high frequency of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) amplification [1]. However, we respectfully disagree with Jayson et al.’s opinion. Literature reviews revealed that in mucinous ovarian carcinoma, the frequency of Her2 amplification/over-expression is estimated to be between 18 and 35% [2], and the presence of human Kras mutations is 13 to 60% [3-5]. This preliminary report aims to enlighten the readership that the ~100% Kras mutant frequency and the high Her2 amplification rate in mucinous ovarian carcinoma may be higher than what has been observed in other studies, including our own. Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of 21 cases of mucinous ovarian carcinoma. All the donors’ identities have been permanently deleted. Abbott PathVysion Her2 DNA Probe Kit and the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) breast cancer scoring methods were used to examine for Her2 FISH ratio. The Kras mutant-enriched polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Kits (FemtoPath®) and a following direct sequencing method were applied to analyze exon 2 of the Kras gene. The reason why we choose Kras exon 2 to analyze is because Kras gene mutations are mainly known to cluster in several hotspots, with exon 2 (codons 12 and 13) being most commonly affected [6-9]. The prevalence of Kras mutations and Her2 amplification within 21 Taiwanese mucinous ovarian carcinoma cases is shown in Table 1, which indicates that the amplification rate of Her2 was 33.33% (n = 7), while the mutation rate of Kras was 61.90% (n = 13). Additionally, the rates of co-existing Kras mutations and Her2 amplification were 9.52% (n = 2) (Table 1). However, there was a lack of statistically significant association between Her2 amplification and Kras mutations (p = 0.057).
Table 1

The prevalence and relationship of Kras mutations and Her2 amplification in mucinous ovarian carcinoma

Her2 non-amplification Her2 amplificationTotal
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Kras wild type3 (14.29)5 (23.81)8 (38.10)
Kras mutation11 (52.38)2 (9.52)13 (61.90)
Total14 (66.67)7 (33.33)21 (100.00)
P value0.056a

n (%) number (percentage)

aFisher’s exact test

The prevalence and relationship of Kras mutations and Her2 amplification in mucinous ovarian carcinoma n (%) number (percentage) aFisher’s exact test Of the 13 cases of mucinous ovarian carcinoma with Kras mutations, 12 cases had a single missense mutation, which was composed of G12V in 4 cases, G12D in 5 cases, G12A in 1 case and A11V in 2 cases. The remaining 1 case had triple missense mutations—A11V, G13N and V14I. Moreover, both A11V and V14I were novel discoveries, based on the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database [10].

Conclusion

Both Her2 amplification and Kras activating mutations are not mutually exclusive, which indicates that Her2/Kras/mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) is a crucial pathway in the carcinogenesis of mucinous ovarian neoplasms. Targeting this pathway seems to be a viable therapeutic option for patients with recurrent or advanced stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Treatment selection based on the molecular alterations of Her2 and Kras can possibly produce superior therapeutic effects compared with nonselective treatments. Additionally, functional impacts of these 2 novel Kras mutations (A11V, V14I) are still unknown; further studies using bioinformatics tools and molecular modeling are encouraged.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gordon C Jayson; Elise C Kohn; Henry C Kitchener; Jonathan A Ledermann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Assessing the HER2 status in mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer on the basis of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline update.

Authors:  Wan-Ru Chao; Ming-Yung Lee; Wea-Lung Lin; Chiew-Loon Koo; Gwo-Tarng Sheu; Chih-Ping Han
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review.

Authors:  J L Bos
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Analysis of KRAS Mutations of Exon 2 Codons 12 and 13 by SNaPshot Analysis in Comparison to Common DNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Rica Zinsky; Servet Bölükbas; Holger Bartsch; Joachim Schirren; Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Expression of c-myc and mutation of the KRAS gene in patients with ovarian mucinous tumors.

Authors:  X S Li; J Sun; X L He
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2015-09-09

Review 6.  Mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  T J Perren
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Comparative analysis of KRAS codon 12, 13, 18, 61, and 117 mutations using human MCF10A isogenic cell lines.

Authors:  Britta Stolze; Stefanie Reinhart; Lars Bulllinger; Stefan Fröhling; Claudia Scholl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Multipoint Kras oncogene mutations potentially indicate mucinous carcinoma on the entire spectrum of mucinous ovarian neoplasms.

Authors:  Yi-Ju Lee; Ming-Yung Lee; Alexandra Ruan; Chi-Kuan Chen; Hao-Ping Liu; Chau-Jong Wang; Wan-Ru Chao; Chih-Ping Han
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-13

9.  A comprehensive survey of Ras mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Ian A Prior; Paul D Lewis; Carla Mattos
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  KRAS mutation analysis in ovarian samples using a high sensitivity biochip assay.

Authors:  Veronika Auner; Gernot Kriegshäuser; Dan Tong; Reinhard Horvat; Alexander Reinthaller; Alexander Mustea; Robert Zeillinger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Phase Ib Study of Binimetinib with Paclitaxel in Patients with Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Final Results, Potential Biomarkers, and Extreme Responders.

Authors:  Rachel N Grisham; Kathleen N Moore; Michael S Gordon; Wael Harb; Gwendolyn Cody; Darragh F Halpenny; Vicky Makker; Carol A Aghajanian
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Potential signaling pathways as therapeutic targets for overcoming chemoresistance in mucinous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Emiko Niiro; Sachiko Morioka; Kana Iwai; Yuki Yamada; Kenji Ogawa; Naoki Kawahara; Hiroshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2018-01-17

3.  Establishment of patient-derived tumor xenograft models of mucinous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Francesca Ricci; Federica Guffanti; Roberta Affatato; Laura Brunelli; Pastorelli Roberta; Robert Fruscio; Patrizia Perego; Maria Rosa Bani; Giovanna Chiorino; Andrea Rinaldi; Francesco Bertoni; Maddalena Fratelli; Giovanna Damia
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Morphological and phenotypical features of ovarian metastases in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Inge T A Peters; Merle A van der Steen; Bertine W Huisman; Carina G J M Hilders; Vincent T H B M Smit; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Cornelis F M Sier; J Baptist Trimbos; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Recent Insights into Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Francesca Ricci; Roberta Affatato; Laura Carrassa; Giovanna Damia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Development of Phosphorothioate DNA and DNA Thioaptamers.

Authors:  David E Volk; Ganesh L R Lokesh
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2017-07-13

7.  Advances Of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy In Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Wenying Yan; Hongmei Hu; Biao Tang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Patient-derived tumor models are attractive tools to repurpose drugs for ovarian cancer treatment: pre-clinical updates.

Authors:  Magdalena Cybula; Magdalena Bieniasz
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2022-03-24

9.  Identification of PLK1 as a New Therapeutic Target in Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Roberta Affatato; Laura Carrassa; Rosaria Chilà; Monica Lupi; Valentina Restelli; Giovanna Damia
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.