| Literature DB >> 28030637 |
Mamoudou Sétamou1, Catherine R Simpson1, Olufemi J Alabi2, Shad D Nelson1, Srilakshmi Telagamsetty1, John L Jifon3.
Abstract
Studies were conducted to relate the influence of the physical characteristics, leaf nutrient content and phloem sap amino acid concentration ofEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28030637 PMCID: PMC5193449 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168997
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Nutrient profiles of young and mature grapefruit and lemon flush shoots collected at different seasons in 2014–2015.
| Grapefruit | Lemon | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul-14 | Sep-14 | Dec-14 | Mar-15 | Jul-14 | Sep-14 | Dec-14 | Mar-15 | |||||||||
| mg·g-1 | Y | M | Y | M | Y | M | Y | M | Y | M | Y | M | Y | M | Y | M |
| Nitrogen | 37.4a | 29.1b | 34.9a | 25.9b | - | 23.1 | 44.3a | 22.3b | 42.7a | 27.3b | 52.1a | 28.0b | - | 29.0 | 51.5a | 22.1b |
| Phosphorus | 4.56a | 1.71b | 5.5a | 2.3b | - | 2.06 | 6.20a | 1.6b | 4.2a | 1.7b | 6.2a | 1.7b | - | 2.45 | 6.9a | 1.4b |
| Potassium | 18.1a | 14.20a | 17.3a | 13.8a | - | 12.7 | 16.6a | 12.5b | 17.4a | 9.1b | 18.4a | 9.1a | - | 13.14 | 19.7a | 9.52b |
| Calcium | 6.76b | 51.67a | 8.2b | 45.1a | - | 54.2 | 9.04b | 40.1a | 10.6b | 65.9a | 6.8b | 41.0a | - | 56.8 | 10.2b | 50.7a |
| Magnesium | 2.36b | 3.33a | 2.8b | 4.4a | - | 3.83 | 2.18b | 3.3a | 2.8 | 3.9a | 2.9a | 2.2a | - | 2.72 | 2.44a | 2.62a |
| Sodium | 1.39a | 0.61b | 0.65b | 0.44b | - | 0.46 | 1.6a | 1.2a | 1.91a | 0.30b | 1.5a | 0.28b | - | 0.11 | 2.26a | 1.25b |
| Zinc | 0.01a | 0.01a | 0.02a | 0.01b | - | 0.013 | 0.024a | 0.009b | 0.02a | 0.01a | 0.03a | 0.01b | - | 0.012 | 0.03a | 0.01b |
| Iron | 0.02b | 0.07a | 0.03a | 0.04a | - | 0.033 | 0.029a | 0.007b | 0.03b | 0.06a | 0.03a | 0.12a | - | 0.034 | 0.02b | 0.05a |
| Copper | 0.005a | 0.006a | 0.01a | 0.01a | - | 0.006 | 0.009a | 0.007a | 0.006a | 0.003b | 0.01a | 0.01a | - | 0.007 | 0.01a | 0.004b |
| Manganese | 0.01a | 0.03a | 0.01b | 0.02a | - | 0.032 | 0.01a | 0.02a | 0.017b | 0.036a | 0.02a | 0.02a | - | 0.029 | 0.02a | 0.03a |
| Sulfur | 2.59a | 3.34a | 2.51a | 3.27a | - | 3.32 | 2.6a | 2.4a | 2.83b | 3.92a | 2.8a | 2.6a | - | 3.70 | 3.0a | 2.94a |
| Boron | 0.03b | 0.13a | 0.03b | 0.12a | - | 0.15 | 0.02b | 0.13a | 0.03b | 0.12a | 0.03b | 0.01a | - | 0.13 | 0.026b | 0.14b |
| Carbon | 45.5 | 41.1 | 46.9 | 40.9 | - | 41.3 | 47.1 | 41.2 | 43.3 | 41.8 | 45.2 | 41.7 | - | 41.2 | 45.7 | 41.3 |
| N:C ratio | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.63 | - | 0.56 | 0.94 | 0.54 | 0.99 | 0.65 | 1.15 | 0.67 | - | 0.70 | 1.13 | 0.54 |
| N:S ratio | 14.4a | 8.7b | 13.9a | 7.9b | - | 6.95 | 17.0a | 8.6b | 15.1a | 7.0b | 18.6a | 10.8b | - | 7.84 | 17.2a | 7.5b |
| N:Ca ratio | 5.5a | 0.6b | 4.3a | 0.6b | - | 0.4 | 4.9a | 0.6b | 4.0a | 0.4b | 7.7a | 0.7b | - | 0.5 | 5.0a | 0.4b |
* Young flush shoots not present at this time.
** Only one composite sample was analyzed for carbon per flush stage for each host plant.
Means followed by the same letter for each sampling period per cultivar are not significantly different (P > 0.05) using the Tukey’s mean comparison test.
Fig 1Effects of citrus flush shoot growth stage on leaf tissue mineral nutrient compositions.
The analysis shows discrimination between mature and young flush shoots of both grapefruit and lemon. The explained variance of both principal component 1 (PC1) and PC2 are in parentheses (59.6% and 18.9%, respectively).
Mean (± SE) total concentrations of free amino acids (TAA), essential amino acids (EAA) and their ratio (TAA:EAA) in phloem sap of young and mature grapefruit and lemon flush shoots.
| Host Plant | Sampling Period | Flush shoot stage | Total amino acids (TAA, μg/mL) | Essential amino acids (EAA, μg/mL) | TAA:EAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grapefruit | June 2014 | Young | 1,769.0 ± 124.6 | 187.7± 11.0 | 10.6 |
| Mature | 93.2 ± 6.5 | 7.8 ± 0.9 | 8.4 | ||
| September 2014 | Young | 1,000.6 ± 24.9 | 115.6± 7.8 | 11.5 | |
| Mature | 121.7± 11.2 | 9.2 ± 1.6 | 7.5 | ||
| December 2014 | Young | . | . | . | |
| Mature | 198.2 ± 13.1 | 16.3± 3.0 | 8.2 | ||
| March 2015 | Young | 2447.3 ± 295.3 | 341.0 ± 26.7 | 11.3 | |
| Mature | 112.0 ± 9.3 | 7.0 ± 0.9 | 5.3 | ||
| Lemon | June 2014 | Young | 1,475.8 ± 108.1 | 251.7 ± 20.8 | 17.1 |
| Mature | 129.5 ± 7.5 | 10.1 ± 1.9 | 7.8 | ||
| September 2014 | Young | 971.7± 31.6 | 94.3 ± 10.7 | 9.7 | |
| Mature | 130.5± 10.4 | 12.9 ± 2.3 | 9.9 | ||
| December 2014 | Young | . | . | ||
| Mature | 167.9 ± 8.6 | 15.0 ± 2.2 | 8.9 | ||
| March 2015 | Young | 2,238.0 ± 214.4 | 198.6 ± 9.4 | 8.9 | |
| Mature | 171.7± 12.9 | 11.5 ± 1.7 | 6.7 |
Fig 2Percentage composition of proteinogenic amino acids in the phloem sap of young and mature flush shoots of grapefruit (A) and lemon (B).
The analyzed phloem sap samples were collected using the EDTA exudation method at different seasons.
Fig 3Influence of flush shoot growth stage on the composition of proteinogenic amino acids in phloem sap of grapefruit and lemon.
Mature and young flush shoot stages are indicated in green and light blue shades, respectively. Within young shoot cluster, red shade depicts summer, yellow shade depicts fall collection and purple shade shows spring collection. The principal component (PC) analysis shows discrimination between mature and young shoots, and within young shoots discrimination between collection dates. The percentage of data explained by the first two components PC1 and PC2 is in parentheses (82.2 and 10.4%, respectively).
Fig 4Relative abundances of different life stages of Diaphorina citri on flush shoots of Rio Red grapefruit and Meyer lemon (Weslaco, TX, 2014–2015).
The experimental trees did not receive insecticidal application for the entire duration of the study.
Fig 5Densities of Diaphorina citri adults (A) and immatures (B) and corresponding cumulative-psyllid days (C and D) on young and mature ‘Rio Red’ grapefruit and ‘Meyer’ lemon; flush shoots (Weslaco, TX, 2014).
Fig 6Settling preference of Diaphorina citri adults on young and mature flush shoots of grapefruit and lemon.
Section A shows the preference between young and mature flush shoots of the same host plant species, while section B represents the selection of flush shoots of the same age between the two host plants.