Literature DB >> 28029301

Impact of Reflex EGFR/ ALK Testing on Time to Treatment of Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Parneet K Cheema1, Ines B Menjak1, Zoe Winterton-Perks1, Simon Raphael1, Susanna Y Cheng1, Sunil Verma1, Ahmad Muinuddin1, Ryan Freedman1, Nevkeet Toor1, Joseph Perera1, Matthew Anaka1, J Charles Victor1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Optimal first-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced nonsquamous (nonsq) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires confirmation of EGFR/ ALK status, which can delay treatment. We evaluated the impact of reflex testing, defined as pathologists initiating EGFR/ ALK testing at the time of diagnosis of nonsq NSCLC, on time to treatment (TTT).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with nonsq NSCLC with medical oncology consultation at Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre between March 18, 2010 and April 30, 2014. Data were compared during routine and reflex testing. TTT was defined as the interval between the first medical oncology visit with advanced NSCLC and the initiation of systemic therapy.
RESULTS: A total of 306 patients were included (n = 232 for routine testing, n = 74 for reflex testing). There was a trend to improvement in median TTT with reflex testing (36 days [interquartile range {IQR}, 16 to 71 days v 26 days [IQR, 8 to 41 days], P = .071). Omitting patients with intentional delays in systemic therapy for low-volume disease, poor performance status, comorbidity management, and/or radiation therapy, median TTT improved (34 days [IQR, 15 to 67 days] v 22 days [IQR, 8 to 42 days], P = .049). Time to optimal first-line systemic therapy according to published guidelines improved (median, 36 days [IQR, 16 to 91 days] v 24 days [IQR, 8 to 43 days], P = .036). There was no impact on receipt of any first-line systemic therapy (55% v 59%, P = .66). The quality of biomarker testing improved, with fewer unsuccessful tests ( EGFR, 14% v 4%, P = .039; and ALK, 17% v 3%, P = .037).
CONCLUSION: Reflex testing of EGFR/ ALK improved the time to optimal systemic therapy and the quality of biomarker testing for patients with advanced nonsq NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28029301     DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2016.014019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  11 in total

Review 1.  Testing for EGFR Mutations and ALK Rearrangements in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Considerations for Countries in Emerging Markets.

Authors:  Mercedes L Dalurzo; Alejandro Avilés-Salas; Fernando Augusto Soares; Yingyong Hou; Yuan Li; Anna Stroganova; Büge Öz; Arif Abdillah; Hui Wan; Yoon-La Choi
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Evidence-based best practices for EGFR T790M testing in lung cancer in Canada.

Authors:  T Stockley; C A Souza; P K Cheema; B Melosky; S Kamel-Reid; M S Tsao; A Spatz; A Karsan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Standardizing biomarker testing for Canadian patients with advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  B Melosky; N Blais; P Cheema; C Couture; R Juergens; S Kamel-Reid; M-S Tsao; P Wheatley-Price; Z Xu; D N Ionescu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Molecular biomarker testing for non-small cell lung cancer: consensus statement of the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group.

Authors:  Sunhee Chang; Hyo Sup Shim; Tae Jung Kim; Yoon-La Choi; Wan Seop Kim; Dong Hoon Shin; Lucia Kim; Heae Surng Park; Geon Kook Lee; Chang Hun Lee
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2021-05-11

5.  From Race-Based to Precision Oncology: Leveraging Behavioral Economics and the Electronic Health Record to Advance Health Equity in Cancer Care.

Authors:  Kelsey S Lau-Min; Carmen E Guerra; Katherine L Nathanson; Justin E Bekelman
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-17

6.  Adherence to and determinants of guideline-recommended biomarker testing and targeted therapy in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Insights from routine practice.

Authors:  Kelsey S Lau-Min; Yimei Li; Jennifer R Eads; Xiaoliang Wang; Neal J Meropol; Ronac Mamtani; Kelly D Getz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.921

7.  Histologic Grade Is Predictive of Incidence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michelle Levy; Liisa Lyon; Erika Barbero; John Wong; Marie Suga; Danny Sam; Minggui Pan
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-11

8.  Knowledge and Practice Patterns Among Pulmonologists for Molecular Biomarker Testing in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Adam H Fox; James R Jett; Upal Basu Roy; Bruce E Johnson; Jennifer C King; Nikki Martin; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; M Patricia Rivera; Lauren S Rosenthal; Robert A Smith; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas: A Single Center Study from Iran

Authors:  Ali Basi; Flora Khaledi; Mohammad Hadi Karbalaie Niya; Hamid Rezvani; Nasser Rakhshani
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-01-27

10.  Diffuse Lung Metastases in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Subba R Digumarthy; Dexter P Mendoza; Atul Padole; Tianqi Chen; P Gabriel Peterson; Zofia Piotrowska; Lecia V Sequist
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.