Literature DB >> 28028971

Assessment of Pain When Uncovering Implants with Er:YAG Laser or Scalpel for Second Stage Surgery.

Jacek Matys1, Marzena Dominiak2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different methods aimed at decreasing pain during some soft tissue procedures in dentistry are still under research. Modern devices as lasers could be a method to reduce the pain and duration of second stage implant surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the pain and the impression quality when uncovering implants with a laser and with a scalpel.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis included 60 implants (Dentium SuperLine, Suwon, Korea) in 30 patients (23 women and 7 men) aged 25-69. In the experimental group, 30 implants were uncovered by means of an Er:YAG laser (LiteTouch®, Syneron Dental, Yokneam, Israel) with the following fixed operation parameters: 300 mJ, 18 Hz, water cooling at 40%, energy density per pulse: 38.21 J/cm2, tip size: 1.0 × 17 mm, distance: 2 mm, tip angle set at 70°, no anesthesia. As a control, 30 implants were uncovered using a scalpel and topical application of 20% benzocaine. An 11-point numeric pain rating scale (NRS-11) was used to evaluate the pain level. A 3-point prosthetic impression scale (PIS) designed by the authors was used to assess the quality of the impression of the implant emergence profile.
RESULTS: The mean value of pain assessed on the NRS-11 for the Er:YAG laser and scalpel were 2.6 and 6, respectively. The mean value of pain for the laser and scalpel at a supracrestal height of periimplant soft tissue (SHPST) ≤ 3 mm were 1.8 and 4.7 respectively, and for SHPST > 3 mm the values were 3.3 and 7.4, respectively. The implant emergence profile impression showed satisfactory or ideal quality in 26 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Er:YAG laser reduces pain and allows minor surgical procedures to be carried out without anesthesia. The impression quality is satisfactory for the preparation of prosthetic reconstructions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erbium:YAG laser; NRS-11 scale; PIS scale; emergence profile; pain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28028971     DOI: 10.17219/acem/62456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1899-5276            Impact factor:   1.727


  4 in total

1.  Photobiomodulation by a 635nm Diode Laser on Peri-Implant Bone: Primary and Secondary Stability and Bone Density Analysis-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jacek Matys; Katarzyna Świder; Kinga Grzech-Leśniak; Marzena Dominiak; Umberto Romeo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Preservation of keratinized gingiva around dental implants using a diode laser when uncovering implants for second stage surgery.

Authors:  Ra'ed Mohammed Ayoub Al-Delayme
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2019-09-01

Review 3.  Fibroblasts Adhesion to Laser-Modified Titanium Surfaces-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julia Kensy; Maciej Dobrzyński; Rafał Wiench; Kinga Grzech-Leśniak; Jacek Matys
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Optimised Implant Selection Using Digital Volume Tomography (DVT) Osteodensitometry.

Authors:  Manfred Nilius; Jörg Winterhoff
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2022-02-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.