Literature DB >> 2802892

Diagnosis of pedal osteomyelitis in diabetic patients using current scintigraphic techniques.

A M Keenan1, N L Tindel, A Alavi.   

Abstract

Seventy-seven diabetic patients with suspected osteomyelitis of the foot were evaluated by three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS), indium 111-labeled white blood cell scintigraphy (WBCS), roentgenography, or some combination thereof. Retrospective analysis after clinical and pathologic follow-up indicated that the sensitivity of TPBS alone in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis was 100%, with a specificity of only 38% and an accuracy of 63%; the sensitivity of WBCS alone was 100%, with a specificity of 78% and an accuracy of 87%; and the combination of TPBS and WBCS yielded a sensitivity of 100%, with a specificity of 79% and an accuracy of 87%. Roentgenography yielded a sensitivity of 69%, with a specificity of 82% and an accuracy of 76%. The results of this study demonstrate that WBCS is superior to TPBS in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot, and TPBS adds little when viewed in conjunction with WBCS. Based on our observations and because of the high prevalence of neuropathic joint disease and other causes of false-positive bone scans, we believe that WBCS alone is adequate for evaluation of suspected pedal osteomyelitis in diabetic patients, particularly when the suspected lesion is located in the tarsometatarsal region in contrast to the toe region (7% vs 44% specificity and 28% vs 69% accuracy, respectively, for TPBS in these two regions, compared with 100% vs 68% specificity and 100% vs 80% accuracy, respectively, for WBCS in the same two regions).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2802892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Applications for Radiotracer Imaging of Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia.

Authors:  Ting-Heng Chou; Mitchel R Stacy
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pressure sores in spinal cord injured patients: accuracy in predicting osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Luis López de Heredia; Jennifer Hauptfleisch; Richard Hughes; Allison Graham; Tom M M Meagher
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Multimodality imaging of osteomyelitis.

Authors:  A H Elgazzar; H M Abdel-Dayem; J D Clark; H R Maxon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-09

4.  Technetium bone scanning in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis: a meta-analysis of test performance. Diagnostic Technology Assessment Consortium.

Authors:  B Littenberg; A I Mushlin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Imaging the diabetic foot.

Authors:  R H Gold; D J Tong; J R Crim; L L Seeger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis: narrative review and a suggested 2-step score-based diagnostic pathway for clinicians.

Authors:  Anurag Markanday
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 7.  Charcot foot in diabetes and an update on imaging.

Authors:  Fatma Bilge Ergen; Saziye Eser Sanverdi; Ali Oznur
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2013-11-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.