James P Klaas1, Sherri Braksick2, Jay Mandrekar2,3, Petra Sedova2,4,5, M Fernanda Bellolio6, Alejandro A Rabinstein2, Robert D Brown2. 1. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. klaas.james@mayo.edu. 2. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, St. Anne's University Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. 5. International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Providing the correct level of care for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is crucial, but the level of care needed at initial presentation may not be clear. This study evaluated factors associated with admission to intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. METHODS: This is an observational study of all adult patients admitted to our institution with non-traumatic supratentorial ICH presenting within 72 h of symptom onset between 2009-2012 (derivation cohort) and 2005-2008 (validation cohort). Factors associated with neuroscience ICU admission were identified via logistic regression analysis, from which a triage model was derived, refined, and retrospectively validated. RESULTS: For the derivation cohort, 229 patients were included, of whom 70 patients (31 %) required ICU care. Predictors of neuroscience ICU admission were: younger age [odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95 % CI 0.91-0.97; p = 0.0004], lower Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score (0.39, 0.28-0.54; p < 0.0001) or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (0.55, 0.45-0.67; p < 0.0001), and larger ICH volume (1.04, 1.03-1.06; p < 0.0001). The model was further refined with clinician input and the addition of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). GCS was chosen for the model rather than the FOUR score as it is more widely used. The proposed triage ICH model utilizes three variables: ICH volume ≥30 cc, GCS score <13, and IVH. The triage ICH model predicted the need for ICU admission with a sensitivity of 94.3 % in the derivation cohort [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.88; p < 0.001] and 97.8 % (AUC = 0.88) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Presented are the derivation, refinement, and validation of the triage ICH model. This model requires prospective validation, but may be a useful tool to aid clinicians in determining the appropriate level of care at the time of initial presentation for a patient with a supratentorial ICH.
BACKGROUND: Providing the correct level of care for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is crucial, but the level of care needed at initial presentation may not be clear. This study evaluated factors associated with admission to intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. METHODS: This is an observational study of all adult patients admitted to our institution with non-traumatic supratentorial ICH presenting within 72 h of symptom onset between 2009-2012 (derivation cohort) and 2005-2008 (validation cohort). Factors associated with neuroscience ICU admission were identified via logistic regression analysis, from which a triage model was derived, refined, and retrospectively validated. RESULTS: For the derivation cohort, 229 patients were included, of whom 70 patients (31 %) required ICU care. Predictors of neuroscience ICU admission were: younger age [odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95 % CI 0.91-0.97; p = 0.0004], lower Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score (0.39, 0.28-0.54; p < 0.0001) or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (0.55, 0.45-0.67; p < 0.0001), and larger ICH volume (1.04, 1.03-1.06; p < 0.0001). The model was further refined with clinician input and the addition of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). GCS was chosen for the model rather than the FOUR score as it is more widely used. The proposed triage ICH model utilizes three variables: ICH volume ≥30 cc, GCS score <13, and IVH. The triage ICH model predicted the need for ICU admission with a sensitivity of 94.3 % in the derivation cohort [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.88; p < 0.001] and 97.8 % (AUC = 0.88) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Presented are the derivation, refinement, and validation of the triage ICH model. This model requires prospective validation, but may be a useful tool to aid clinicians in determining the appropriate level of care at the time of initial presentation for a patient with a supratentorial ICH.
Authors: Eelco F M Wijdicks; William R Bamlet; Boby V Maramattom; Edward M Manno; Robyn L McClelland Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: J Claude Hemphill; Steven M Greenberg; Craig S Anderson; Kyra Becker; Bernard R Bendok; Mary Cushman; Gordon L Fung; Joshua N Goldstein; R Loch Macdonald; Pamela H Mitchell; Phillip A Scott; Magdy H Selim; Daniel Woo Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: D Rodriguez-Luna; M Rubiera; M Ribo; P Coscojuela; S Piñeiro; J Pagola; M Hernandez-Guillamon; B Ibarra; F Romero; J Alvarez-Sabin; J Montaner; C A Molina Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Charlotte Jj van Asch; Merel Ja Luitse; Gabriël Je Rinkel; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Ale Algra; Catharina Jm Klijn Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Matthew B Maas; Neil F Rosenberg; Adam R Kosteva; Rebecca M Bauer; James C Guth; Eric M Liotta; Shyam Prabhakaran; Andrew M Naidech Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Corey R Fehnel; Kimberly M Glerum; Linda C Wendell; N Stevenson Potter; Brian Silver; Muhib Khan; Ali Saad; Shadi Yaghi; Richard N Jones; Karen Furie; Bradford B Thompson Journal: Neurohospitalist Date: 2017-06-02