Fernando B de Moura1, Lance R McMahon2. 1. Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA. 2. Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229-3900, USA. mcmahonl@uthscsa.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: The extent to which non-α4β2 versus α4β2* nAChRs contribute to the behavioral effects of varenicline and other nAChR agonists is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the discriminative stimulus effects of varenicline and nicotine using various nAChR agonists and antagonists to elucidate possible non-α4β2 nAChR mechanisms. METHODS: Separate groups of male C57BL/6J mice were trained to discriminate varenicline (3.2 mg/kg) or nicotine (1 mg/kg). Test drugs included mecamylamine; the nAChR agonists epibatidine, nicotine, cytisine, varenicline, and RTI-102; the β2-containing nAChR antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE); the α7 nAChR agonist PNU-282987; the α7 antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA); the α3β4 antagonist 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC); and the non-nAChR drugs midazolam and cocaine. RESULTS: In nicotine-trained mice, maximum nicotine-appropriate responding was 95% nicotine, 94% epibatidine, 63% varenicline, 58% cytisine, and less than 50% for RTI-102, PNU-282987, midazolam, and cocaine. In varenicline-trained mice, maximum varenicline-appropriate responding was 90% varenicline, 86% epibatidine, 74% cytisine, 80% RTI-102, 50% cocaine, and 50% or less for nicotine, PNU-282987, and midazolam. Drugs were studied to doses that abolished operant responding. Mecamylamine antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects, but not the rate-decreasing effects, of nicotine and varenicline. DHβE antagonized the discriminative stimulus and rate-decreasing effects of nicotine but not varenicline in either the nicotine or varenicline discrimination assays. The discriminative stimulus, but not the rate-decreasing, effects of epibatidine were antagonized by DHβE regardless of the training drug. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that α4β2* nAChRs differentially mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and varenicline, and suggest that varenicline has substantial non-α4β2 nAChR activity.
RATIONALE: The extent to which non-α4β2 versus α4β2* nAChRs contribute to the behavioral effects of varenicline and other nAChR agonists is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the discriminative stimulus effects of varenicline and nicotine using various nAChR agonists and antagonists to elucidate possible non-α4β2 nAChR mechanisms. METHODS: Separate groups of male C57BL/6J mice were trained to discriminate varenicline (3.2 mg/kg) or nicotine (1 mg/kg). Test drugs included mecamylamine; the nAChR agonists epibatidine, nicotine, cytisine, varenicline, and RTI-102; the β2-containing nAChR antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE); the α7 nAChR agonist PNU-282987; the α7 antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA); the α3β4 antagonist 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC); and the non-nAChR drugs midazolam and cocaine. RESULTS: In nicotine-trained mice, maximum nicotine-appropriate responding was 95% nicotine, 94% epibatidine, 63% varenicline, 58% cytisine, and less than 50% for RTI-102, PNU-282987, midazolam, and cocaine. In varenicline-trained mice, maximum varenicline-appropriate responding was 90% varenicline, 86% epibatidine, 74% cytisine, 80% RTI-102, 50% cocaine, and 50% or less for nicotine, PNU-282987, and midazolam. Drugs were studied to doses that abolished operant responding. Mecamylamine antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects, but not the rate-decreasing effects, of nicotine and varenicline. DHβE antagonized the discriminative stimulus and rate-decreasing effects of nicotine but not varenicline in either the nicotine or varenicline discrimination assays. The discriminative stimulus, but not the rate-decreasing, effects of epibatidine were antagonized by DHβE regardless of the training drug. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that α4β2* nAChRs differentially mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and varenicline, and suggest that varenicline has substantial non-α4β2 nAChR activity.
Entities:
Keywords:
DHβE; Drug discrimination; Mecamylamine; Nicotine; Varenicline; β2 nAChRs
Authors: Roger L Papke; Linda P Dwoskin; Peter A Crooks; Guangrong Zheng; Zhenfa Zhang; J Michael McIntosh; Clare Stokes Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2008-03-28 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: M Hajós; R S Hurst; W E Hoffmann; M Krause; T M Wall; N R Higdon; V E Groppi Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2004-11-02 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: H Rollema; L K Chambers; J W Coe; J Glowa; R S Hurst; L A Lebel; Y Lu; R S Mansbach; R J Mather; C C Rovetti; S B Sands; E Schaeffer; D W Schulz; F D Tingley; K E Williams Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2006-12-08 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Christopher J Magnus; Peter H Lee; Jordi Bonaventura; Roland Zemla; Juan L Gomez; Melissa H Ramirez; Xing Hu; Adriana Galvan; Jayeeta Basu; Michael Michaelides; Scott M Sternson Journal: Science Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Brady M Thompson; Scott T Barrett; Y Wendy Huynh; David A Kwan; Jennifer E Murray; Rick A Bevins Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Robert A Owens; Mohammed A Mustafa; Bogna M Ignatowska-Jankowska; M Imad Damaj; Patrick M Beardsley; Jenny L Wiley; Micah J Niphakis; Benjamin F Cravatt; Aron H Lichtman Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 5.250