Literature DB >> 28028425

Should surgeons control fluoroscopy during urology procedures?

Jeremy Setterfield1, James Watterson1, Mathew Playfair2, Luke T Lavallée3, Matthew Roberts1, Brian Blew1, J Stuart Oake1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our study explored the impact of switching from surgeon- to radiation technologist (RT)-controlled fluoroscopy on fluoroscopy and operative times. We also identified factors impacting fluoroscopy and operative times for ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy.
METHODS: Patients undergoing urological procedures requiring fluoroscopy six months before and after the change from surgeon- to RT-controlled fluoroscopy were identified. Median fluoroscopy and operative times were compared between cohorts. Subgroup analyses were performed based on procedure performed. A multivariate analysis identified factors associated with increased fluoroscopy and operative times for URS with laser lithotripsy.
RESULTS: Overall, no difference was found between surgeon and RT cohorts for fluoroscopy (58.0 vs. 56.7 seconds; p=0.34) or operative times (39 vs. 36 minutes; p=0.14). For URS with laser lithotripsy, fluoroscopy and operative times were longer in the surgeon-controlled cohort (76.0 vs. 54.0 seconds; p<0.01 and 48 vs. 40 minutes; p<0.01, respectively). For URS only, fluoroscopy time was decreased in the surgeon-controlled cohort (47.0 vs. 73.0 seconds; p=0.01). For URS with laser lithotripsy, factors independently associated with increased fluoroscopy time were male sex, flexible URS, glidewire use, and difficult ureteric stent insertion (p<0.05). Flexible ureteroscopy, glidewire use, previous ureteric stent placement, and difficult ureteric stent insertion were independently associated with increased operative time (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy and operative times are not significantly influenced by who controls fluoroscopy during urologic procedures. Patients undergoing URS with laser lithotripsy have decreased fluoroscopy and operative times with RT-controlled fluoroscopy. Patients undergoing URS only have decreased fluoroscopy times with surgeon-controlled fluoroscopy.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28028425      PMCID: PMC5167595          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and initial management of kidney stones.

Authors:  A J Portis; C P Sundaram
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.292

2.  Fluoroscopy time during uncomplicated unilateral ureteroscopy for urolithiasis decreases with urology resident experience.

Authors:  Lancaster R Weld; Uzoamaka O Nwoye; Richard B Knight; Timothy S Baumgartner; James S Ebertowski; Matthew T Stringer; Matthew C Kasprenski; Kyle J Weld
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Comparison of a reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol to conventional fluoroscopy during uncomplicated ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Daniel J Greene; Christopher F Tenggadjaja; Ryan J Bowman; Gautum Agarwal; Kamyar Y Ebrahimi; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Factors determining fluoroscopy time during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Philippe D Violette; Konrad M Szymanski; Maurice Anidjar; Sero Andonian
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Course of calcium stone disease without treatment. What can we expect?

Authors:  W L Strohmaier
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Tracking intraoperative fluoroscopy utilization reduces radiation exposure during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Tin C Ngo; Liam C Macleod; Daniel I Rosenstein; Jeffrey H Reese; Rajesh Shinghal
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.942

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.