Literature DB >> 28028223

Climate change damages to Alaska public infrastructure and the economics of proactive adaptation.

April M Melvin1, Peter Larsen2, Brent Boehlert3,4, James E Neumann3, Paul Chinowsky5, Xavier Espinet5, Jeremy Martinich6, Matthew S Baumann3, Lisa Rennels3, Alexandra Bothner3, Dmitry J Nicolsky7, Sergey S Marchenko7.   

Abstract

Climate change in the circumpolar region is causing dramatic environmental change that is increasing the vulnerability of infrastructure. We quantified the economic impacts of climate change on Alaska public infrastructure under relatively high and low climate forcing scenarios [representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) and RCP4.5] using an infrastructure model modified to account for unique climate impacts at northern latitudes, including near-surface permafrost thaw. Additionally, we evaluated how proactive adaptation influenced economic impacts on select infrastructure types and developed first-order estimates of potential land losses associated with coastal erosion and lengthening of the coastal ice-free season for 12 communities. Cumulative estimated expenses from climate-related damage to infrastructure without adaptation measures (hereafter damages) from 2015 to 2099 totaled $5.5 billion (2015 dollars, 3% discount) for RCP8.5 and $4.2 billion for RCP4.5, suggesting that reducing greenhouse gas emissions could lessen damages by $1.3 billion this century. The distribution of damages varied across the state, with the largest damages projected for the interior and southcentral Alaska. The largest source of damages was road flooding caused by increased precipitation followed by damages to buildings associated with near-surface permafrost thaw. Smaller damages were observed for airports, railroads, and pipelines. Proactive adaptation reduced total projected cumulative expenditures to $2.9 billion for RCP8.5 and $2.3 billion for RCP4.5. For road flooding, adaptation provided an annual savings of 80-100% across four study eras. For nearly all infrastructure types and time periods evaluated, damages and adaptation costs were larger for RCP8.5 than RCP4.5. Estimated coastal erosion losses were also larger for RCP8.5.

Keywords:  Alaska; adaptation; climate change; damages; infrastructure

Year:  2016        PMID: 28028223      PMCID: PMC5240706          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611056113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Subsidence risk from thawing permafrost.

Authors:  F E Nelson; O A Anisimov; N I Shiklomanov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cumulative geoecological effects of 62 years of infrastructure and climate change in ice-rich permafrost landscapes, Prudhoe Bay Oilfield, Alaska.

Authors:  Martha K Raynolds; Donald A Walker; Kenneth J Ambrosius; Jerry Brown; Kaye R Everett; Mikhail Kanevskiy; Gary P Kofinas; Vladimir E Romanovsky; Yuri Shur; Patrick J Webber
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Recent burning of boreal forests exceeds fire regime limits of the past 10,000 years.

Authors:  Ryan Kelly; Melissa L Chipman; Philip E Higuera; Ivanka Stefanova; Linda B Brubaker; Feng Sheng Hu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Permafrost Degradation and Subsidence Observations during a Controlled Warming Experiment.

Authors:  Anna M Wagner; Nathaniel J Lindsey; Shan Dou; Arthur Gelvin; Stephanie Saari; Christopher Williams; Ian Ekblaw; Craig Ulrich; Sharon Borglin; Alejandro Morales; Jonathan Ajo-Franklin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Degrading permafrost puts Arctic infrastructure at risk by mid-century.

Authors:  Jan Hjort; Olli Karjalainen; Juha Aalto; Sebastian Westermann; Vladimir E Romanovsky; Frederick E Nelson; Bernd Etzelmüller; Miska Luoto
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Circumpolar permafrost maps and geohazard indices for near-future infrastructure risk assessments.

Authors:  Olli Karjalainen; Juha Aalto; Miska Luoto; Sebastian Westermann; Vladimir E Romanovsky; Frederick E Nelson; Bernd Etzelmüller; Jan Hjort
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 6.444

4.  Climate policy implications of nonlinear decline of Arctic land permafrost and other cryosphere elements.

Authors:  Dmitry Yumashev; Chris Hope; Kevin Schaefer; Kathrin Riemann-Campe; Fernando Iglesias-Suarez; Elchin Jafarov; Eleanor J Burke; Paul J Young; Yasin Elshorbany; Gail Whiteman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Compound changes in temperature and snow depth lead to asymmetric and nonlinear responses in landscape freeze-thaw.

Authors:  Shadi Hatami; Ali Nazemi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Possibility for strong northern hemisphere high-latitude cooling under negative emissions.

Authors:  Jörg Schwinger; Ali Asaadi; Nadine Goris; Hanna Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Wildfire as a major driver of recent permafrost thaw in boreal peatlands.

Authors:  Carolyn M Gibson; Laura E Chasmer; Dan K Thompson; William L Quinton; Mike D Flannigan; David Olefeldt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  "What are you going to do, Protest the Wind?": Community Perceptions of Emergent and Worsening Coastal Erosion from the Remote Bering Sea Community of St. Paul, Alaska.

Authors:  Jessica Tran; Lauren M Divine; Leanna R Heffner
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.266

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.