Literature DB >> 28028197

Limited Cognitive Resources Explain a Trade-Off between Perceptual and Metacognitive Vigilance.

Brian Maniscalco1,2, Li Yan McCurdy3, Brian Odegaard4, Hakwan Lau4,5.   

Abstract

Why do experimenters give subjects short breaks in long behavioral experiments? Whereas previous studies suggest it is difficult to maintain attention and vigilance over long periods of time, it is unclear precisely what mechanisms benefit from rest after short experimental blocks. Here, we evaluate decline in both perceptual performance and metacognitive sensitivity (i.e., how well confidence ratings track perceptual decision accuracy) over time and investigate whether characteristics of prefrontal cortical areas correlate with these measures. Whereas a single-process signal detection model predicts that these two forms of fatigue should be strongly positively correlated, a dual-process model predicts that rates of decline may dissociate. Here, we show that these measures consistently exhibited negative or near-zero correlations, as if engaged in a trade-off relationship, suggesting that different mechanisms contribute to perceptual and metacognitive decisions. Despite this dissociation, the two mechanisms likely depend on common resources, which could explain their trade-off relationship. Based on structural MRI brain images of individual human subjects, we assessed gray matter volume in the frontal polar area, a region that has been linked to visual metacognition. Variability of frontal polar volume correlated with individual differences in behavior, indicating the region may play a role in supplying common resources for both perceptual and metacognitive vigilance. Additional experiments revealed that reduced metacognitive demand led to superior perceptual vigilance, providing further support for this hypothesis. Overall, results indicate that during breaks between short blocks, it is the higher-level perceptual decision mechanisms, rather than lower-level sensory machinery, that benefit most from rest. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Perceptual task performance declines over time (the so-called vigilance decrement), but the relationship between vigilance in perception and metacognition has not yet been explored in depth. Here, we show that patterns in perceptual and metacognitive vigilance do not follow the pattern predicted by a previously suggested single-process model of perceptual and metacognitive decision making. We account for these findings by showing that regions of anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC) previously associated with visual metacognition are also associated with perceptual vigilance. We also show that relieving metacognitive task demand improves perceptual vigilance, suggesting that aPFC may house a limited cognitive resource that contributes to both metacognition and perceptual vigilance. These findings advance our understanding of the mechanisms and dynamics of perceptual metacognition.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/371213-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aPFC; metacognition; psychophysics; signal detection theory; vigilance; voxel-based morphometry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28028197      PMCID: PMC6596853          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2271-13.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  13 in total

1.  Distinguishing the Roles of Dorsolateral and Anterior PFC in Visual Metacognition.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Revisiting the Concept of Vigilance.

Authors:  Gerhard Klösch; Josef Zeitlhofer; Osman Ipsiroglu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 3.  Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Domain-General and Domain-Specific Patterns of Activity Supporting Metacognition in Human Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Jorge Morales; Hakwan Lau; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The posterior cerebellum supports the explicit sequence learning linked to trait attribution.

Authors:  Min Pu; Elien Heleven; Jeroen Delplanque; Noémie Gibert; Qianying Ma; Giulia Funghi; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Moment-to-Moment Fluctuations in Neuronal Excitability Bias Subjective Perception Rather than Strategic Decision-Making.

Authors:  Luca Iemi; Niko A Busch
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-06-14

7.  Human metacognition across domains: insights from individual differences and neuroimaging.

Authors:  Marion Rouault; Andrew McWilliams; Micah G Allen; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Personal Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-12

8.  How experimental procedures influence estimates of metacognitive ability.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2019-06-09

9.  Trade-Off vs. Common Factor-Differentiating Resource-Based Explanations From Their Alternative.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Robert Gaschler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-11

10.  The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.