Literature DB >> 28028191

Clinic Versus Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Difference in Hypertensive Patients: The Impact of Age and Clinic Blood Pressure.

José R Banegas1, Luis M Ruilope2, Alejandro de la Sierra2, Ernest Vinyoles2, Manuel Gorostidi2, Juan J de la Cruz2, Julián Segura2, Anna Oliveras2, Nieves Martell2, Juan García-Puig2, Bryan Williams2.   

Abstract

Clinic blood pressure (BP) is usually higher than daytime ambulatory BP in hypertensive patients, but some recent studies have challenged this view, suggesting that this relationship is strongly influenced by age. We used the Spanish ambulatory BP monitoring cohort to examine differences between clinic and daytime BP by age among 104 639 adult hypertensive patients (office systolic/diastolic BP ≥140/90 mm Hg or treated) in usual primary-care practice, across the wide age spectrum. To assess the impact of age, cardiovascular variables, and clinic BP on the clinic-daytime BP differences, we built multivariable regression models of the average BP differences, white-coat hypertension (high clinic BP and normal daytime BP), and masked hypertension (normal clinic BP and high daytime BP). In most patients, mean clinic BP values were higher than daytime BP at all ages. Some 36.7% of patients had white-coat hypertension (amounting to 50% at clinic systolic BP of 140-159 mm Hg) and 3.9% had masked hypertension (amounting to 18% at clinic systolic BP of 130-139 mm Hg). Age explained 0.1% to 1.7% of the variance of quantitative or categorical BP differences (P<0.001). Cardiovascular variables explained an additional 1.6% to 3.4% of the variance (P<0.001). Finally, clinic BP generally explained ≥20% more of the variance (P<0.01). In this large study in usual clinical practice, clinic BP misclassified hypertension status in >40% of patients. This misclassification was not importantly influenced by age but was more evident in patients with borderline/grade 1 hypertension. These findings reinforce the importance of ambulatory BP monitoring for defining BP status in routine clinical practice.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age group; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; conventional blood pressure; epidemiology; hypertension

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28028191     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  10 in total

1.  Ambulatory not office blood pressure predicts mortality also in the elderly.

Authors:  Michael Bursztyn
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 2.  Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement to Predict Hypertension-Related Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality.

Authors:  Thwe Htay; Damaris Rosado; Dale Quest; Jessica Giller; Najjar Haya; Sarah Ream; Jorge Cervantes
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Replacing salt with low-sodium salt substitutes (LSSS) for cardiovascular health in adults, children and pregnant women.

Authors:  Amanda Brand; Marianne E Visser; Anel Schoonees; Celeste E Naude
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-10

4.  Prevalence of office and ambulatory hypotension in treated hypertensive patients with coronary disease.

Authors:  Juan A Divisón-Garrote; Juan J de la Cruz; Alejandro de la Sierra; Ernest Vinyoles; Manuel Gorostidi; Carlos Escobar-Cervantes; Julián Segura; Vivencio Barrios; Luis M Ruilope; José R Banegas
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Blood pressure related to age: The India ABPM study.

Authors:  Upendra Kaul; Stefano Omboni; Priyadarshini Arambam; Srinivas Rao; Sunil Kapoor; Jitendra P S Swahney; Kamal Sharma; Tiny Nair; Manoj Chopda; Jagdish Hiremath; Chandrashekhar K Ponde; Abraham Oomman; Budanur C Srinivas; Viraj Suvarna; Sanjiv Jasuja; Eric Borges; Willem J Verberk
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  The effect of lercanidipine or lercanidipine/enalapril combination on blood pressure in treatment-naïve patients with stage 1 or 2 systolic hypertension.

Authors:  Brian Rayner
Journal:  Pragmat Obs Res       Date:  2019-01-22

7.  Effect of Intensive and Standard Clinic-Based Hypertension Management on the Concordance Between Clinic and Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Blood Pressure Variability in SPRINT.

Authors:  Lama Ghazi; Nicholas M Pajewski; Dena E Rifkin; Jeffrey T Bates; Tara I Chang; William C Cushman; Stephen P Glasser; William E Haley; Karen C Johnson; William J Kostis; Vasilios Papademetriou; Mahboob Rahman; Debra L Simmons; Addison Taylor; Paul K Whelton; Jackson T Wright; Udayan Y Bhatt; Paul E Drawz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Magnitude of the Difference Between Clinic and Ambulatory Blood Pressures and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Elaine Ku; Raymond K Hsu; Delphine S Tuot; Se Ri Bae; Michael S Lipkowitz; Miroslaw J Smogorzewski; Barbara A Grimes; Matthew R Weir
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Nitrate Derived From Beetroot Juice Lowers Blood Pressure in Patients With Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cicero Jonas R Benjamim; Andrey Alves Porto; Vitor Engrácia Valenti; Andressa Crystine da Silva Sobrinho; David M Garner; Bruno Gualano; Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-03-15

10.  Association of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure with new-onset atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Francesca Coccina; Anna M Pierdomenico; Matteo De Rosa; Chiara Cuccurullo; Sante D Pierdomenico
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.738

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.