Literature DB >> 28027823

As Low Dose as Sufficient Quality: Optimization of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scanning Protocol for Tooth Autotransplantation Planning and Follow-up in Children.

Mostafa EzEldeen1, Andreas Stratis2, Wim Coucke3, Marina Codari4, Constantinus Politis2, Reinhilde Jacobs2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tooth autotransplantation (TAT) offers a viable biological approach to tooth replacement in children. To enhance the outcome predictability of the TAT procedure, a cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT)-based surgical planning and transfer technique has been developed. The aim of this study was to optimize the CBCT scanning protocol to achieve a dose as low as possible and to maintain sufficient image quality.
METHODS: A sectional head phantom (SK150; The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) was scanned using 18 exposure protocols in 3 different CBCT machines: 3D Accuitomo 170 (Morita, Kyoto, Japan), ProMax 3D MAX (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland), and NewTom VGI EVO (QR Verona, Verona, Italy). The effective dose (ED) was calculated using Monte Carlo simulation and pediatric voxel phantoms (5- and 8-year-old males and a 12-year-old female). Image quality was assessed by comparing segmented teeth volumes, evaluation of the visibility of the lamina dura, and morphologic surface analysis of 3-dimensional models. A general linear mixed model was fit to combine image quality parameters and radiation effective dose for each protocol in order to rank and compare the protocols examined in the study.
RESULTS: The ED for the preoperative scan can be reduced to the range of 74.6-157.9 μSv, with ProMax with ultra-low-dose high-definition reconstruction (Planmeca) 100 × 90 scoring the highest. The ED for the postoperative scan can be reduced to the range of 24.2-41.5 μSv with ProMax with ultra-low-dose normal-dose reconstruction 50 × 55 and NewTom 50 × 50 with the standard mode scoring the highest.
CONCLUSIONS: A considerable reduction in the pediatric ED can be achieved while maintaining sufficient image quality for tooth autotransplantation planning and follow-up using the dose optimization protocols.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-beam computed tomographic imaging; pediatric radiation effective dose; tooth autotransplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28027823     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  10 in total

1.  Image quality optimization using a narrow vertical detector dental cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Danieli Moura Brasil; Ruben Pauwels; Wim Coucke; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement.

Authors:  Anne Caroline Oenning; Reinhilde Jacobs; Ruben Pauwels; Andreas Stratis; Mihaela Hedesiu; Benjamin Salmon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-11-15

3.  Three-dimensional qualitative and quantitative analyses of the effect of periradicular lesions on the outcome of regenerative endodontic procedures: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Heeresh Shetty; Shishir Shetty; Adesh Kakade; Sayali Mali; Aditya Shetty; Prasanna Neelakantan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  An investigation into dose optimisation for imaging root canal anatomy using cone beam CT.

Authors:  Margarete B McGuigan; Christie Theodorakou; Henry F Duncan; Jonathan Davies; Anita Sengupta; Keith Horner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  3D Printed Temporary Veneer Restoring Autotransplanted Teeth in Children: Design and Concept Validation Ex Vivo.

Authors:  Ali Al-Rimawi; Mostafa EzEldeen; Danilo Schneider; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Halve the dose while maintaining image quality in paediatric Cone Beam CT.

Authors:  Anne Caroline Oenning; Ruben Pauwels; Andreas Stratis; Karla De Faria Vasconcelos; Elisabeth Tijskens; Annelore De Grauwe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Benjamin Salmon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Anne-Mari Ilo; Marja Ekholm; Elmira Pakbaznejad Esmaeili; Janna Waltimo-Sirén
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Three-dimensional semi-automated volumetric assessment of the pulp space of teeth following regenerative dental procedures.

Authors:  Heeresh Shetty; Shishir Shetty; Adesh Kakade; Aditya Shetty; Mohmed Isaqali Karobari; Ajinkya M Pawar; Anand Marya; Artak Heboyan; Adith Venugopal; The Hanh Nguyen; Dinesh Rokaya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Evaluating the X-ray-Shielding Performance of Graphene-Oxide-Coated Nanocomposite Fabric.

Authors:  Serhat Süha Türkaslan; Şule Sultan Ugur; Banu Esencan Türkaslan; Nicholas Fantuzzi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Cone beam CT optimisation for detection of vertical root fracture with metal in the field of view or the exomass.

Authors:  Amanda P Candemil; Benjamin Salmon; Karla F Vasconcelos; Anne C Oenning; Reinhilde Jacobs; Deborah Q Freitas; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Francesca Mangione; Matheus L Oliveira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.