Literature DB >> 28027717

Efficiency of slaughterhouse surveillance for the detection of bovine tuberculosis in cattle in Northern Ireland.

A V Pascual-Linaza1, A W Gordon2, L A Stringer3, F D Menzies4.   

Abstract

Post-mortem examination continues to play an important surveillance role in the bovine tuberculosis (bTB) eradication programme in Northern Ireland. It is estimated that 18-28% of new bTB herd breakdowns are disclosed by the detection of bTB lesions in animals routinely slaughtered. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different slaughterhouses in Northern Ireland in detecting bTB-lesioned animals at routine slaughter (LRS) and to apply the findings to maximize the sensitivity of bTB slaughterhouse surveillance. Univariate statistical analysis on cattle slaughtered in Northern Ireland during 2011-2013 revealed that the risk of LRS disclosure varied between slaughterhouses, ranging from 0·08% to 0·54%. Furthermore, the risk of confirmation of these LRS as bTB varied between slaughterhouses, ranging from 57·9% to 72·4%. Logistic regression modelling of selected risk factors found that the risk of LRS disclosure increased with age, and was higher in purchased animals, during winter months, in animals coming from high bTB incidence areas and in animals slaughtered from herds with a bTB restriction in the last 2-3 years. Adjusting for these selected factors, the risk of LRS disclosure and bTB confirmation changed very little from the univariable analysis, suggesting that differences in disclosure risks between slaughterhouses were likely to be due to factors related to the slaughterhouses, rather than to the risk status of the animals presented. Examination of procedures within these slaughterhouses is recommended to identify ways that could increase the sensitivity of their bTB surveillance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abattoir; bovine tuberculosis; post-mortem examination; slaughterhouse; surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28027717      PMCID: PMC9507821          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268816003095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   4.434


  23 in total

1.  Tuberculous infection in cattle not detected by slaughterhouse inspection.

Authors:  I N de Kantor; A Nader; A Bernardelli; D O Girón; E Man
Journal:  Zentralbl Veterinarmed B       Date:  1987-04

2.  Factors associated with bovine tuberculosis confirmation rates in suspect lesions found in cattle at routine slaughter in Great Britain, 2003-2008.

Authors:  A Shittu; R S Clifton-Hadley; E R Ely; P U Upton; S H Downs
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Efficiency of inspection procedures for the detection of tuberculous lesions in cattle.

Authors:  L Corner; L Melville; K McCubbin; K J Small; B S McCormick; P R Wood; J S Rothel
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 4.  Cattle-to-cattle transmission of bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  F D Menzies; S D Neill
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.688

Review 5.  A computerised database system for bovine traceability.

Authors:  R Houston
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.181

6.  Bovine tuberculosis in Europe from the perspective of an officially tuberculosis free country: trade, surveillance and diagnostics.

Authors:  Irene Schiller; W Ray Waters; W RayWaters; H Martin Vordermeier; Thomas Jemmi; Michael Welsh; Nicolas Keck; Adam Whelan; Eamonn Gormley; Maria Laura Boschiroli; Jean Louis Moyen; Carmen Vela; Monica Cagiola; Bryce M Buddle; Mitchell Palmer; Tyler Thacker; Bruno Oesch
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Early lesion formation in cattle experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis.

Authors:  J P Cassidy; D G Bryson; J M Pollock; R T Evans; F Forster; S D Neill
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.311

8.  Quantification of the relative efficiency of factory surveillance in the disclosure of tuberculosis lesions in attested Irish cattle.

Authors:  K Frankena; P W White; J O'Keeffe; E Costello; S W Martin; I van Grevenhof; S J More
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Estimation of the individual slaughterhouse surveillance sensitivity for bovine tuberculosis in Catalonia (North-Eastern Spain).

Authors:  A Garcia-Saenz; S Napp; S Lopez; J Casal; A Allepuz
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  Pathology of bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  M Domingo; E Vidal; A Marco
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.534

View more
  10 in total

1.  Correlation between carcass condemnations in slaughterhouses and official notifications of cattle testing positive for tuberculosis.

Authors:  Danilo Guedes Junqueira Junior; Mariana Assunção de Souza; Sebastião Corrêa Nunes Júnior; Anna Monteiro Correia Lima
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  The impact of the number of tuberculin skin test reactors and infection confirmation on the risk of future bovine tuberculosis incidents; a Northern Ireland perspective.

Authors:  M J H O'Hagan; J A Stegeman; L P Doyle; L A Stringer; E A Courcier; F D Menzies
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Risk factors and variations in detection of new bovine tuberculosis breakdowns via slaughterhouse surveillance in Great Britain.

Authors:  Trevelyan J McKinley; Debby Lipschutz-Powell; Andrew P Mitchell; James L N Wood; Andrew J K Conlan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Post-mortem surveillance of bovine tuberculosis in Ireland: herd-level variation in the probability of herds disclosed with lesions at routine slaughter to have skin test reactors at follow-up test.

Authors:  Andrew W Byrne; Damien Barrett; Philip Breslin; Jamie M Madden; James O'Keeffe; Eoin Ryan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 5.  Modeling Dynamic Human Behavioral Changes in Animal Disease Models: Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Bias.

Authors:  Arata Hidano; Gareth Enticott; Robert M Christley; M Carolyn Gates
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-21

Review 6.  Review on Bovine Tuberculosis: An Emerging Disease Associated with Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium Species.

Authors:  Mohamed Borham; Atef Oreiby; Attia El-Gedawy; Yamen Hegazy; Hazim O Khalifa; Magdy Al-Gaabary; Tetsuya Matsumoto
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-06-21

7.  Revisiting the relative effectiveness of slaughterhouses in Ireland to detect tuberculosis lesions in cattle (2014-2018).

Authors:  Rischi Robinson Male Here; Eoin Ryan; Philip Breslin; Klaas Frankena; Andrew William Byrne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  The variable prevalence of bovine tuberculosis among dairy herds in Central Ethiopia provides opportunities for targeted intervention.

Authors:  Gizat Almaw; Andrew J K Conlan; Gobena Ameni; Balako Gumi; Alemseged Alemu; Sintayehu Guta; Solomon Gebre; Abebe Olani; Abebe Garoma; Dereje Shegu; Letebrhan Yimesgen; Demeke Nigussie; James L N Wood; Tamrat Abebe; Adane Mihret; Stefan Berg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Combining Analytical Approaches and Multiple Sources of Information to Improve Interpretation of Diagnostic Test Results for Tuberculosis in Wild Meerkats.

Authors:  Stuart J Patterson; Charlene Clarke; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Michele A Miller; Sven D C Parsons; Dirk U Pfeiffer; Timothée Vergne; Julian A Drewe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.231

10.  Investigating Farm Fragmentation as a Risk Factor for Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle Herds: A Matched Case-Control Study from Northern Ireland.

Authors:  Georgina Milne; Jordon Graham; John McGrath; Raymond Kirke; Wilma McMaster; Andrew William Byrne
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-02-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.