Literature DB >> 2802769

[Evaluating the success of surgery of stress incontinence--subjective and objective success].

G deGregorio1.   

Abstract

This study comprises a comparison between subjective and objective results in 197 patients who underwent surgery for stress urinary incontinence. The objective success of surgery could be demonstrated by urodynamic measurements. The correlation of subjective and objective data showed a discrepancy, however, it were rather postoperative side effects and complaints which determined the subjective impression, for example voiding disturbances and complaints in sexual intercourse, than the surgical success. (Two thirds of the patients with recurrencies were at least content.) All control examinations should ask not only for the objective clinical result, but also for the subjective impression, especially with regard to side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2802769     DOI: 10.1007/bf02417571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  3 in total

1.  Modifications of the urethral rest and stress profiles after different types of surgery for urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  A Weil; H Reyes; P Bischoff; R D Rottenberg; F Krauer
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1984-01

2.  A clinical and urodynamic assessment of the Burch colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence.

Authors:  P Hilton; S L Stanton
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-10

3.  [Effect of stress incontinence operations on urodynamic parameters. 1. Is surgical success measurable?].

Authors:  G de Gregorio; G Dietz; M Heisterkamp; F J Kaltenbach; H G Hillemanns
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.915

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.