Literature DB >> 28027600

Comparison of longterm outcomes and quality of life in recipients of donation after cardiac death liver grafts with a propensity-matched cohort.

Kristopher P Croome1, David D Lee1, Dana K Perry1, Justin M Burns1, Justin H Nguyen1, Andrew P Keaveny1, C Burcin Taner1.   

Abstract

The use of liver grafts from donation after cardiac death (DCD) has been limited due to the increased rate of graft failure, mostly related to ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). It is our hypothesis that longterm outcomes and quality of life (QOL) similar to patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) with donation after brain death (DBD) can be achieved. Clinical outcomes of all patients undergoing DCD LT (n = 300) between 1998 and 2015 were compared with a propensity score-matched cohort of patients undergoing DBD LT (n = 300). Patients were contacted for a follow-up questionnaire and short-form (SF)-12 QOL Survey administration. Median follow-up was >5 years. Graft survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-years was 83.8%, 75.5%, and 70.1% in the DCD LT group and 88.4%, 80.3%, and 73.9% in the DBD LT group (P = 0.27). Patient survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-years was 92.3%, 86.1%, and 80.3% in the DCD LT group and 92.3%, 85.1%, and 79.5% in the DBD LT group (P = 0.81). IC developed in 11.7% and 2% of patients in the DCD LT group and DBD LT group, respectively (P < 0.001). DCD LT recipients who developed IC had inferior graft survival compared with both the DCD non-IC group (P < 0.001) and the DBD LT group (P < 0.001); no difference in graft survival was observed between the DCD non-IC group and the DBD LT group (P = 0.50). Physical and Mental Composite Scores on the SF-12 QOL questionnaire were similar between the DCD LT and DBD LT groups (44.0 versus 45.4; P = 0.34 and 51.9 versus 52.2; P = 0.83), respectively. Similar longterm survival and QOL scores can be achieved between DCD LT and DBD LT. Prevention of IC in DCD LT yields excellent graft and patient survival with virtually no difference compared with DBD LT. Liver Transplantation 23 342-351 2017 AASLD.
© 2016 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28027600     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  13 in total

1.  Outcomes of Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Grafts From Donors 50 Years or Older: A Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Amit K Mathur; David D Lee; Adyr A Moss; Charles B Rosen; Julie K Heimbach; C Burcin Taner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Human liver stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles reduce injury in a model of normothermic machine perfusion of rat livers previously exposed to a prolonged warm ischemia.

Authors:  Nicola De Stefano; Victor Navarro-Tableros; Dorotea Roggio; Alberto Calleri; Federica Rigo; Ezio David; Alessandro Gambella; Daniela Bassino; Antonio Amoroso; Damiano Patrono; Giovanni Camussi; Renato Romagnoli
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 3.  The Changing Landscapes in DCD Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; C Burcin Taner
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2020-07-13

4.  The volume-outcomes relationship in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.

Authors:  Aaron M Delman; Kevin M Turner; Allison M Ammann; Emily Schepers; Dennis M Vaysburg; Alex R Cortez; Robert M Van Haren; Greg C Wilson; Shimul A Shah; Ralph C Quillin
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.456

Review 5.  Impact of Machine Perfusion on Biliary Complications after Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Andrea Schlegel; Philipp Dutkowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Comparison of Supraceliac and Infrarenal Aortic Conduits in Liver Transplantation: Is There a Difference in Patency and Postoperative Renal Dysfunction?

Authors:  David Livingston; David D Lee; Sarah Croome; C Burcin Taner; Kristopher P Croome
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2019-10-08

Review 7.  Expanding Indications for Liver Transplant: Tumor and Patient Factors.

Authors:  Kevin Ka-Wan Chu; Kelly Hiu-Ching Wong; Kenneth Siu-Ho Chok
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.519

8.  Cholangiocyte Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) is a potential molecular mechanism driving ischemic cholangiopathy in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Niluka Wickramaratne; Ru Li; Tao Tian; Jad Khoraki; Hae Sung Kang; Courtney Chmielewski; Jerry Maitland; Loren K Liebrecht; Ria Fyffe-Freil; Susanne Lyra Lindell; Martin J Mangino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predictors of Biliary Strictures After Liver Transplantation Among Recipients of DCD (Donation After Cardiac Death) Grafts.

Authors:  Divyanshoo R Kohli; M Edwyn Harrison; Abimbola O Adike; Bara El Kurdi; Norio Fukami; Douglas O Faigel; Rahul Pannala; Adyr A Moss; Bashar A Aqel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  Liver preservation prior to transplantation: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Marcio F Chedid; Marcelo A Pinto; Jose Felipe G Juchem; Tomaz J M Grezzana-Filho; Cleber R P Kruel
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.