Literature DB >> 28026876

Variability of ICA decomposition may impact EEG signals when used to remove eyeblink artifacts.

Matthew B Pontifex1, Kathryn L Gwizdala1, Andrew C Parks1, Martin Billinger2, Clemens Brunner3.   

Abstract

Despite the growing use of independent component analysis (ICA) algorithms for isolating and removing eyeblink-related activity from EEG data, we have limited understanding of how variability associated with ICA uncertainty may be influencing the reconstructed EEG signal after removing the eyeblink artifact components. To characterize the magnitude of this ICA uncertainty and to understand the extent to which it may influence findings within ERP and EEG investigations, ICA decompositions of EEG data from 32 college-aged young adults were repeated 30 times for three popular ICA algorithms. Following each decomposition, eyeblink components were identified and removed. The remaining components were back-projected, and the resulting clean EEG data were further used to analyze ERPs. Findings revealed that ICA uncertainty results in variation in P3 amplitude as well as variation across all EEG sampling points, but differs across ICA algorithms as a function of the spatial location of the EEG channel. This investigation highlights the potential of ICA uncertainty to introduce additional sources of variance when the data are back-projected without artifact components. Careful selection of ICA algorithms and parameters can reduce the extent to which ICA uncertainty may introduce an additional source of variance within ERP/EEG studies.
© 2016 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifacts; EEG; EEGLAB; Eyeblinks; ICA; Independent component analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28026876      PMCID: PMC5584537          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  27 in total

1.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; C Humphries; T W Lee; M J McKeown; V Iragui; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization.

Authors:  Johan Himberg; Aapo Hyvärinen; Fabrizio Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  On the influence of high-pass filtering on ICA-based artifact reduction in EEG-ERP.

Authors:  Irene Winkler; Stefan Debener; Klaus-Robert Müller; Michael Tangermann
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

Review 4.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

7.  The component structure of event-related potentials in the p300 speller paradigm.

Authors:  Siri-Maria Kamp; Anthony R Murphy; Emanuel Donchin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Identifying reliable independent components via split-half comparisons.

Authors:  David M Groppe; Scott Makeig; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Independent EEG sources are dipolar.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Jason Palmer; Julie Onton; Robert Oostenveld; Scott Makeig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Roman Goj; Mainak Jas; Teon Brooks; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti Hämäläinen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  8 in total

1.  Placebo controlled phase II clinical trial: Safety and efficacy of combining intranasal insulin & acute exercise.

Authors:  Kathryn L Gwizdala; David P Ferguson; Jeffery Kovan; Vera Novak; Matthew B Pontifex
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.584

2.  Event-related desynchronization during movement attempt and execution in severely paralyzed stroke patients: An artifact removal relevance analysis.

Authors:  Eduardo López-Larraz; Thiago C Figueiredo; Ainhoa Insausti-Delgado; Ulf Ziemann; Niels Birbaumer; Ander Ramos-Murguialday
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.881

3.  Novel feature extraction method for signal analysis based on independent component analysis and wavelet transform.

Authors:  Mariusz Topolski; Jędrzej Kozal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Improved Cognitive Vigilance Assessment after Artifact Reduction with Wavelet Independent Component Analysis.

Authors:  Nadia Abu Farha; Fares Al-Shargie; Usman Tariq; Hasan Al-Nashash
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Case Study: Intra- and Interpersonal Coherence of Muscle and Brain Activity of Two Coupled Persons during Pushing and Holding Isometric Muscle Action.

Authors:  Laura V Schaefer; Frank N Bittmann
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-29

6.  A Review on Machine Learning Approaches in Identification of Pediatric Epilepsy.

Authors:  Mohammed Imran Basheer Ahmed; Shamsah Alotaibi; Sujata Dash; Majed Nabil; Abdullah Omar AlTurki
Journal:  SN Comput Sci       Date:  2022-08-10

7.  Comparing the reliability of different ICA algorithms for fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Pengxu Wei; Ruixue Bao; Yubo Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  The effects of acute aerobic exercise on inhibitory control and resting state heart rate variability in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Chien-Lin Yu; Shu-Shih Hsieh; Ting-Yu Chueh; Chung-Ju Huang; Charles H Hillman; Tsung-Min Hung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.