Literature DB >> 28026106

Recovery concept in a Norwegian setting to be examined by the assertive community treatment model and mixed methods.

Ann-Mari Lofthus1,2, Heidi Westerlund3, Dagfinn Bjørgen3, Jonas Christoffer Lindstrøm4, Arnhild Lauveng1, Diana Rose5, Torleif Ruud1, Kristin Heiervang1.   

Abstract

Recovery is a crucial concept in the mental health field. The research of recovery is split into the categories of personal, social and clinical recovery. The purpose of this study was to explore the fragmented concept of recovery in light of assertive community treatment (ACT) in Norway. The study has a mixed methods design with a pragmatic approach. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery and open-ended questions posed to 70 participants from 12 ACT teams in Norway, gathered by the "Users interview users" method, are combined with interviews or focus groups with eight of these participants. Surprisingly those under a community treatment order (CTO) report the highest degree of personal recovery. The qualitative material shows that the service users interpreted the concept of recovery differently than researchers and professionals. The ACT service users highlighted three important elements: flexible treatment, medication and access to a car. They emphasized the necessity for basic needs to be met in order to experience a meaningful recovery process, and these basic needs may be of even greater importance to those under CTOs. Their experiences should imply a greater emphasis on securing basic needs such as secure housing, sounder finances and access to the normal benefits offered by society.
© 2016 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assertive community treatment; basic needs; mixed methods; questionnaire about the process of recovery; recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28026106     DOI: 10.1111/inm.12304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  2 in total

1.  How clinicians make decisions about CTOs in ACT: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hanne Kilen Stuen; Anne Landheim; Jorun Rugkåsa; Rolf Wynn
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2018-09-22

2.  Associations between personal recovery and service user-rated versus clinician-rated clinical recovery, a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Regina Skar-Fröding; Hanne Clausen; Jūratė Šaltytė Benth; Torleif Ruud; Mike Slade; Kristin S Heiervang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.630

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.