Literature DB >> 28025779

Correlation of Ki-67 Proliferative Antigen Expression and Tumor Response to Induction Chemotherapy Containing Cell Cycle-Specific Agents in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Jonathan Chatzkel1, James S Lewis2, Jessica C Ley1, Tanya M Wildes1,3, Wade Thorstad3,4, Hiram Gay3,4, Mackenzie Daly3,4, Ryan Jackson3,5, Jason Rich3,5, Randal Paniello3,5, Brian Nussenbaum3,5, Jingxia Liu6, Barry A Siegel3,7, Farrokh Dehdashti3,7, Douglas Adkins8,9.   

Abstract

Determine if highly proliferative head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, assessed by pretreatment Ki-67 expression, respond more robustly to induction chemotherapy (IC) that is selectively toxic to cycling cells. Retrospective analysis of 59 patients treated with IC and chemoradiation. IC included either nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab (APF-C, n = 27) or docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU +/- cetuximab (TPF+/-C, n = 32). Ki-67 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Tumor response (complete/partial/stable/progressive) at the primary site after two IC cycles was evaluated by visual examination in all patients. In the APF-C sub-group, tumor response (primary site and neck nodes) after two IC cycles was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT. Ki-67 expression (median 66%, range: 16-97) did not differ across the tumor response categories assessed by visual examination (p = 0.95), CT (p = 0.30), or FDG-PET/CT (p = 0.65). Median decrease in summed SUVmax of measured lesions was 71.6% (range: 8.3-100%). The Pearson correlation coefficient between Ki-67 expression and the percent decrease in summed SUVmax was 0.48 (p = 0.02). Ki-67 expression was not different between those with or without a relapse (median: 60 and 71%, p = 0.10). In multivariate regression analysis (MVA) controlling for p16 positive oropharyngeal SCC status and smoking status, Ki-67 expression was not significantly associated with tumor response by visual examination (coefficient estimate -0.002, standard error 0.010, p = 0.84), CT (coefficient estimate -0.007, standard error 0.011, p = 0.54), FDG-PET/CT (coefficient estimate 0.006, standard error 0.008, p = 0.51), the percent decrease in summed SUVmax (coefficient estimate 0.389, standard error 0.222, p = 0.09), or relapse events (OR = 1.02(95%CI:0.99-1.05), p = 0.28). No significant relationships were found in MVA between pretreatment Ki-67 expression and tumor response to IC or to relapse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy sensitivity; HNSCC; Ki-67 expression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28025779      PMCID: PMC5550393          DOI: 10.1007/s12105-016-0775-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck Pathol        ISSN: 1936-055X


  36 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Microtubule inhibitors: Differentiating tubulin-inhibiting agents based on mechanisms of action, clinical activity, and resistance.

Authors:  Edith A Perez
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Amplification of HER-2 in gastric carcinoma: association with Topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification, intestinal type, poor prognosis and sensitivity to trastuzumab.

Authors:  M Tanner; M Hollmén; T T Junttila; A I Kapanen; S Tommola; Y Soini; H Helin; J Salo; H Joensuu; E Sihvo; K Elenius; J Isola
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (sequential chemoradiotherapy) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer (PARADIGM): a randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Robert Haddad; Anne O'Neill; Guilherme Rabinowits; Roy Tishler; Fadlo Khuri; Douglas Adkins; Joseph Clark; Nicholas Sarlis; Jochen Lorch; Jonathan J Beitler; Sewanti Limaye; Sarah Riley; Marshall Posner
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  p53 and Ki-67 as markers of radioresistance in head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian Couture; Hélène Raybaud-Diogène; Bernard Têtu; Isabelle Bairati; Danielle Murry; Josée Allard; André Fortin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Prognostic relevance of cell proliferation in head and neck tumors.

Authors:  A Pich; L Chiusa; R Navone
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 8.  HER2 in gastric cancer: a new prognostic factor and a novel therapeutic target.

Authors:  C Gravalos; A Jimeno
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Cyclin D1-a prognostic marker in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma that is tightly associated with high-risk human papillomavirus status.

Authors:  Juliette B Scantlebury; Jingqin Luo; Wade L Thorstad; Samir K El-Mofty; James S Lewis
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Recombinant humanized anti-HER2 antibody (Herceptin) enhances the antitumor activity of paclitaxel and doxorubicin against HER2/neu overexpressing human breast cancer xenografts.

Authors:  J Baselga; L Norton; J Albanell; Y M Kim; J Mendelsohn
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  6 in total

1.  Differential Markers of Subpopulations of Epithelial Cells of the Larynx in Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  I V Arutyunyan; A G Soboleva; K B Gordon; D S Kudashkina; D A Miroshnichenko; A P Polyakov; I V Rebrikova; A V Makarov; A V Lokhonina; T Kh Fatkhudinov
Journal:  Bull Exp Biol Med       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 0.737

2.  Loss of E-Cadherin Expression Correlates With Ki-67 in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Cristina Stefania Dumitru; Amalia Raluca Ceausu; Serban Comsa; Marius Raica
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Characteristics of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell Lines reflect human tumor biology independent of primary etiologies and HPV status.

Authors:  Thankam S Nair; Trey B Thomas; Lucy Yang; Bala Naveen Kakaraparthi; Anna C Morris; Alanna M Clark; Lora P Campredon; Andrew F Brouwer; Marisa C Eisenberg; Rafael Meza; Thomas E Carey
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  A patient tumour-on-a-chip system for personalised investigation of radiotherapy based treatment regimens.

Authors:  R Kennedy; D Kuvshinov; A Sdrolia; E Kuvshinova; K Hilton; S Crank; A W Beavis; V Green; J Greenman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Glycoprotein NMB promotes tumor formation and malignant progression of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lev Manevich; Yukari Okita; Yasuhito Okano; Takehito Sugasawa; Kunio Kawanishi; Thanasis Poullikkas; Linda T L Dang Cao; Ling Zheng; Masahiro Nakayama; Shin Matsumoto; Keiji Tabuchi; Mitsuyasu Kato
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.518

6.  Nonsmoking and Nondrinking Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Different Entity.

Authors:  Zhan Yang; Wei Du; Xu Zhang; Defeng Chen; Qigen Fang; Yuezhong He; Yang Yang; Ding Li; Jie Fan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.