Literature DB >> 28025772

Laparoscopically Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy with Esophagogastrostomy Using a Novel "Open-Door" Technique : LAPG with Novel Reconstruction.

Kei Hosoda1, Keishi Yamashita2, Hiromitsu Moriya2, Hiroaki Mieno2, Akira Ema2, Marie Washio2, Masahiko Watanabe2.   

Abstract

Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) with esophagogastrostomy using a novel "open-door" technique was introduced recently, with the aim of preventing gastroesophageal reflux. However, quantitate assessment of gastroesophageal reflux after this surgery has not been performed till date. The aims of the current study were to investigate the safety and feasibility of this operation and to elucidate the postoperative reflux status. Twenty consecutive patients (18 men) with (y)cStage I gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach who underwent LAPG at Kitasato University Hospital from May 2015 through September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. We performed 24-h impedance-pH monitoring 3 months after surgery for the first eight patients and analyzed the postoperative reflux status. Median operation time was 333 min, while median anastomotic time was 81 min. None of the 20 patients experienced anastomotic leakage while two patients experienced anastomotic stricture requiring endoscopic balloon dilatation. No patient experienced heartburn without antacid drugs. During the 24-h impedance-pH monitoring, all but one patient had normal gastroesophageal acid reflux with the acid percent time of <1.1% and reflux percent time of <1.4%. One patient with marginally abnormal postoperative gastroesophageal reflux had a normal DeMeester score of 3.0. Our results showed that esophagogastrostomy using the "open-door" technique is a safe and feasible procedure for LAPG. The degree of gastroesophageal reflux was acceptable using this technique. Randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-ups are required to confirm that this technique would be superior to the others.

Entities:  

Keywords:  24-h impedance-pH monitoring; Esophagogastrostomy; Gastric cancer; Gastroesophageal reflux; Laparoscopic surgery; Open-door technique; Proximal gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28025772     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3341-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  10 in total

1.  The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System for gastric surgery in Japan.

Authors:  N Tanigawa; S W Lee; T Kimura; T Mori; I Uyama; E Nomura; J Okuda; F Konishi
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2011-04-20

2.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Potential benefits of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy for cT1 upper-third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kei Hosoda; Keishi Yamashita; Natsuya Katada; Hiromitsu Moriya; Hiroaki Mieno; Tomotaka Shibata; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Shiro Kikuchi; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R Demeester
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Variant parameter values-as defined by the Chicago Criteria-produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter.

Authors:  S Kuribayashi; K Iwakiri; A Kawada; N Kawami; S Hoshino; N Takenouchi; H Hosaka; Y Shimoyama; O Kawamura; M Yamada; M Kusano
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Norio Shiraishi; Yosuke Adachi; Seigo Kitano; Kenji Kakisako; Masafumi Inomata; Kazuhiro Yasuda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Clinical experience of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with Toupet-like partial fundoplication in early gastric cancer for preventing reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakuramoto; Keishi Yamashita; Shiro Kikuchi; Nobue Futawatari; Natsuya Katada; Hiromitsu Moriya; Kazuya Hirai; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Laparoscopy-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy with the Hinged Double Flap Method.

Authors:  Atsushi Muraoka; Masahiko Kobayashi; Yasutaka Kokudo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Limited surgery for early gastric cancer in cardia.

Authors:  H Furukawa; M Hiratsuka; S Imaoka; O Ishikawa; T Kabuto; Y Sasaki; M Kameyama; H Ohigashi; H Nakano; T Yasuda
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in Japan: 2009 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry.

Authors:  Atsushi Nashimoto; Kohei Akazawa; Yoh Isobe; Isao Miyashiro; Hitoshi Katai; Yasuhiro Kodera; Shunichi Tsujitani; Yasuyuki Seto; Hiroshi Furukawa; Ichiro Oda; Hiroyuki Ono; Satoshi Tanabe; Michio Kaminishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 7.370

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas: individualization of resection with special considerations for Siewert type II, and Nishi types EG, E=G and GE cancers.

Authors:  Arnulf H Hölscher; Simon Law
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Reconstruction Methods and Complications of Esophagogastrostomy and Jejunal Interposition in Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nan Du; Pei Wu; Pengliang Wang; Yuwei Du; Kai Li; Zhenning Wang; Huimian Xu; Zhi Zhu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.260

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.