| Literature DB >> 28025525 |
Mrinal Singha1,2, Bingfang Wu3, Miao Zhang4.
Abstract
Accurate and timely mapping of paddy rice is vital for food security and environmental sustainability. This study evaluates the utility of temporal features extracted from coarse resolution data for object-based paddy rice classification of fine resolution data. The coarse resolution vegetation index data is first fused with the fine resolution data to generate the time series fine resolution data. Temporal features are extracted from the fused data and added with the multi-spectral data to improve the classification accuracy. Temporal features provided the crop growth information, while multi-spectral data provided the pattern variation of paddy rice. The achieved overall classification accuracy and kappa coefficient were 84.37% and 0.68, respectively. The results indicate that the use of temporal features improved the overall classification accuracy of a single-date multi-spectral image by 18.75% from 65.62% to 84.37%. The minimum sensitivity (MS) of the paddy rice classification has also been improved. The comparison showed that the mapped paddy area was analogous to the agricultural statistics at the district level. This work also highlighted the importance of feature selection to achieve higher classification accuracies. These results demonstrate the potential of the combined use of temporal and spectral features for accurate paddy rice classification.Entities:
Keywords: Assam; classification, HJ-1A/B; fusion; object-based; paddy rice mapping; temporal features
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28025525 PMCID: PMC5298583 DOI: 10.3390/s17010010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Location map of study site in Assam, India. The background image is a HJ-1A false color composite (red: NIR band, green: Red band, blue: Green band) of 5 December 2014.
Data sets used in the study.
| Satellite | Sensor | Acquisition Time | Paddy Rice Phenology Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| HJ-1A | CCD2 | 22-10-2014 | Heading |
| HJ-1A | CCD1 | 05-12-2014 | Ripening |
| HJ-1B | CCD1 | 09-03-2015 | Planting |
| MODIS | Terra | 07-04-2014 to 22-03-2015 | Sowing–Harvesting |
Figure 2Raw and smoothed time series NDVI for a randomly selected pixel of an agriculture landscape.
Technical specifications of HJ-1A/B.
| Satellite | Sensor | Bands | Spectral Range ( | Spatial Resolution (m) | Swath Width (km) | Revisit Period (day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HJ-1 A/B | CCD | 1 | 0.43–0.52 | 30 | 360 | 4 |
| 2 | 0.52–0.60 | |||||
| 3 | 0.63–0.69 | |||||
| 4 | 0.76–0.90 |
Figure 3Flowchart of fine resolution paddy rice classification combining temporal features from time series coarse resolution data.
Figure 4Schematic of ESTARFM fusion of MODIS NDVI and HJ CCD NDVI.
Figure 5Actual and corresponding ESTARFM fused NDVI images. The fused NDVI was produced using two image pairs of HJ CCD and MODIS NDVI. (a) MODIS NDVI; (b) Fused NDVI.
Feature definitions and their relationships to vegetation.
| Features | Definition | Relations to Vegetation |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum value | The largest NDVI value of the time series | Seasonal highest greenness value |
| Minimum value | The smallest NDVI value of the time series | Seasonal lowest greenness value |
| Mean value | The mean NDVI value of the time series | Mean greenness level |
| Standard deviation value | The standard deviation value of NDVI time series | Standard deviation of greenness level |
| Base NDVI value (BV) | The average of the left and right minimum value of fitted function | Soil background conditions |
| Amplitude (Amp) | The difference between the maximum and the base NDVI value | Seasonal range of greenness variation |
| Left derivative (LD) | The ratio of the difference between the left 20% and 80% levels to the corresponding time difference | Rate of greening and vegetation growth |
| Right derivative (RD) | The ratio of the difference between the right 20% and 80% levels to the corresponding time difference | Rate of browning and senescence |
| Large seasonal integral (LI) | The sum of the representative function with a positive fit during the growing season | Vegetation production over the growing season |
| Small seasonal integral (SI) | The sum of the difference between the fitted function and the base level during the growing season | Seasonally active vegetation production over the growing season |
| 23 NDVI layers | Fused time series NDVI of one year | Seasonal variation of greenness over a year |
Top 15 features ranked by their importance for classification.
| No. | Features | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Standard Deviation value | 0.09315 |
| 2 | NDVI-2015017 | 0.08965 |
| 3 | NDVI-2015065 | 0.08347 |
| 4 | NDVI-2014113 | 0.07607 |
| 5 | NDVI-2014193 | 0.07595 |
| 6 | NDVI-2014337 | 0.07456 |
| 7 | NDVI-2014257 | 0.07451 |
| 8 | LI | 0.07302 |
| 9 | Minimum value | 0.07166 |
| 10 | NDVI-2015001 | 0.07054 |
| 11 | NDVI-2015081 | 0.07015 |
| 12 | Mean value | 0.07004 |
| 13 | NDVI-2014209 | 0.07003 |
| 14 | Maximum value | 0.06843 |
| 15 | NDVI-2014225 | 0.06827 |
Figure 6Graph of local variance (LV) and rate of change (ROC) at different scales for HJ CCD images with shape: 0.1 and compactness: 0.7.
Figure 7Paddy rice classification map obtained from the OI+ best-selected temporal features with the C4.5 classifier.
Figure 8Paddy rice classification map obtained with the traditional method (i.e., the C4.5 classifier) and one HJ CCD image in the peak growing season (22 October).
Classification accuracies of four composites.
| Strategy | C4.5 | CART | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCR (%) | Kappa Coefficient | Paddy Rice MS (%) | CCR (%) | Kappa Coefficient | Paddy Rice MS (%) | |
| Single-date spectral image of October (OI) | 65.62 | 0.33 | 57.70 | 56.25 | 0.14 | 52.40 |
| OI+ all temporal features | 81.25 | 0.61 | 90.90 | 81.25 | 0.61 | 90.90 |
| OI+ best-selected temporal features | 84.37 | 0.68 | 81.30 | 87.50 | 0.75 | 82.40 |
| Temporal spectral images | 90.62 | 0.81 | 87.50 | 78.12 | 0.55 | 78.60 |
Comparison between the derived paddy rice area and the agricultural statistics. The derived paddy area corresponds to the result of OI+ best-selected temporal features with the C4.5 classifier of Figure 7.
| Districts | Derived Paddy Area | Agriculture Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| (Thousand Hectares) | (Thousand Hectares) | |
| Barpeta | 70.83 | 72.94 |
| Bongaigaon | 39.50 | 48.85 |
| Goalpara | 41.91 | 57.61 |
| Kamrup | 96.70 | 101.52 |
| Nalbari | 69.16 | 70.13 |
| Total | 318.10 | 351.05 |
Figure 9Comparison of agriculture statistics paddy rice areas of 2012 to the mapped area of 2014 for five districts.