| Literature DB >> 28025512 |
Thanh Binh Pham1, Huy Bui2, Huu Thang Le3, Van Hoi Pham4.
Abstract
The necessity of environmental protection has stimulated the development of many kinds of methods allowing the determination of different pollutants in the natural environment, including methods for determining nitrate in source water. In this paper, the characteristics of an etched fiber Bragg grating (e-FBG) sensing probe-which integrated in fiber laser structure-are studied by numerical simulation and experiment. The proposed sensor is demonstrated for determination of the low nitrate concentration in a water environment. Experimental results show that this sensor could determine nitrate in water samples at a low concentration range of 0-80 ppm with good repeatability, rapid response, and average sensitivity of 3.5 × 10-3 nm/ppm with the detection limit of 3 ppm. The e-FBG sensing probe integrated in fiber laser demonstrates many advantages, such as a high resolution for wavelength shift identification, high optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR of 40 dB), narrow bandwidth of 0.02 nm that enhanced accuracy and precision of wavelength peak measurement, and capability for optical remote sensing. The obtained results suggested that the proposed e-FBG sensor has a large potential for the determination of low nitrate concentrations in water in outdoor field work.Entities:
Keywords: etched-Fiber Bragg Grating; fiber laser; nitrate; optical sensor
Year: 2016 PMID: 28025512 PMCID: PMC5298580 DOI: 10.3390/s17010007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Experimental setup and mount design for making etched-fiber Bragg grating (e-FBG). ASE: amplified spontaneous emission; OSA: optical spectrum analyzer.
Figure 2(a) Wavelength shift of FBG versus the etching time; and (b) reflected spectra of FBG before and after etching process.
Figure 3SEM images of e-FBGs with diameters of: (a) 33.9 µm; (b) 10 µm; (c) 6.55 µm; and (d) of e-FBG surface with roughness of 7.94 nm.
Figure 4The spectral responses of (a) e-FBG from reflected configuration; and (b) of e-FBG integrated fiber laser configuration. The −3 dB-bandwidths of spectra decreased from 0.55 nm to 0.02 nm, and optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) increased from 3 dB to 40 dB.
Figure 5(a) Spectral response for different concentrations of nitrate solutions from fiber laser sensor; and (b) Bragg wavelength shift as a linear function of nitrate concentrations in water.
Comparison of nitrate-in-water detection limits and response times using different sensors.
| Type of Sensors | Limit of Detection (ppm) | Measured Response Time | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electrochemical sensor | 1.35 | Tens of minutes | Liang et al. [ |
| Graphene oxide sensor | 0.05 | 30 min | Ren et al. [ |
| Disposable Electrochemical sensor | 8.6 | Not reported | Bui et al. [ |
| Evanescent wave absorption Fiber sensor | 0.06 | Not reported | Kumar et al. [ |
| Colorimetric sensor | 4.0 | 30 min | Kunduru et al. [ |
| Lopine sensitive layer Fiber sensor | 1.0 | 40 milliseconds | Camas-Anzueto et al. [ |
| e-FBG in fiber laser sensor | 3.0 | Milliseconds | This work |