Literature DB >> 28024986

Natural history of diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a systematic literature review.

Jasper L A Vleugels1, Yark Hazewinkel1, Paul Fockens1, Evelien Dekker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diminutive (1-5 mm) and small (6-9 mm) polyps comprise 90% of detected lesions during colonoscopy and rarely contain advanced histology or colorectal cancer (CRC). Routine removal of these lesions results in a significant burden to colonoscopy programs. At the same time, the risk for progression of these polyps to CRC is unclear. We performed a systematic review to explore the natural history of diminutive and small colorectal polyps.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies investigating the natural history of colorectal polyps. Studies were considered eligible when they assessed patients with 1- to 9-mm polyps that were not treated with polypectomy and that underwent follow-up. We excluded studies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, polyposis syndromes, and previously diagnosed CRC. We independently extracted study characteristics and evaluated CRC and advanced adenoma (size ≥ 10 mm, containing high-grade dysplasia or villous features) as outcome parameters.
RESULTS: Of 8775 retrieved studies, 9 studies with 721 patients were included that prospectively evaluated the evolution of 1- to 9-mm polyps. In 7 studies the average duration of observation was 2 to 3 years. There was only 1 study in which 1 small polyp might have progressed to cancer. Of 1034 adenomas sized 1 to 9 mm in those studies, 6% progressed to advanced adenomas over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this systematic review, it appears that some 1- to 9-mm adenomas progress to advanced adenomas within 2 to 3 years. No information on long-term CRC transition rates was found. Defining the biologic significance of these polyps is needed to balance between benefits and harm of polypectomy. (PROSPERO database registration number: CRD42016036577.).
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28024986     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  16 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: a narrative review of current data and clinical applications.

Authors:  James Weiquan Li; Lai Mun Wang; Tiing Leong Ang
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  GPs' perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients: an exploratory qualitative study from a Dutch context.

Authors:  Lucinda Bertels; Sientje van der Heijden; Maartje Hoogsteyns; Evelien Dekker; Kristel van Asselt; Henk van Weert; Bart Knottnerus
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2019-03-20

3.  Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein as markers for colorectal polyp histological type.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Liguang Wang; Qi Zhao; Zhen Li; Man Chen; Guodong Lian; Junyong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  A Correctional-Public Health Collaboration for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a State Prison System.

Authors:  Dora M Dumont; Deborah Davis; Radha Sadacharan; Eric Lamy; Jennifer G Clarke
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Polypectomy techniques among gastroenterologists in Norway - a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Ina B Pedersen; Magnus Løberg; Geir Hoff; Mette Kalager; Michael Bretthauer; Øyvind Holme
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-07-04

6.  Quantitative analysis of in vivo high-resolution microendoscopic images for the detection of neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Yubo Tang; Alexandros D Polydorides; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Multicentre study of surgical referral and outcomes of patients with benign colorectal lesions.

Authors:  N C A Vermeer; M P M de Neree Tot Babberich; P Fockens; I D Nagtegaal; C J H van de Velde; E Dekker; P J Tanis; K C M J Peeters
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-07-30

8.  Uptake and barriers for implementation of the resect and discard strategy: an international survey.

Authors:  Philippe Willems; Roupen Djinbachian; Saskia Ditisheim; Sinan Orkut; Heiko Pohl; Alan Barkun; Mickael Bouin; Bernard Faulques; Daniel von Renteln
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-04-17

Review 9.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Yusuke Saitoh; Takahisa Matsuda; Masahiro Igarashi; Takayuki Matsumoto; Yasushi Iwao; Yasumoto Suzuki; Ryoichi Nozaki; Tamotsu Sugai; Shiro Oka; Michio Itabashi; Ken-Ichi Sugihara; Osamu Tsuruta; Ichiro Hirata; Hiroshi Nishida; Hiroto Miwa; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Tooru Shimosegawa; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Synchronous Neoplastic Lesions In Referred Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Kongxi Zhu; Weihua Yu; Yunxia Wang; Teng Wang; Shuang Guo; Guoxin Teng; Jianqiang Guo
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.