Literature DB >> 28024947

Clinical Genomic Profiling of a Diverse Array of Oncology Specimens at a Large Academic Cancer Center: Identification of Targetable Variants and Experience with Reimbursement.

Anthony N Sireci1, Vimla S Aggarwal1, Andrew T Turk1, Tatyana Gindin1, Mahesh M Mansukhani1, Susan J Hsiao2.   

Abstract

Large cancer panels are being increasingly used in the practice of precision medicine to generate genomic profiles of tumors with the goal of identifying targetable variants and guiding eligibility for clinical trials. To facilitate identification of mutations in a broad range of solid and hematological malignancies, a 467-gene oncology panel (Columbia Combined Cancer Panel) was developed in collaboration with pathologists and oncologists and is currently available and in use for clinical diagnostics. Herein, we share our experience with this testing in an academic medical center. Of 255 submitted specimens, which encompassed a diverse range of tumor types, we were able to successfully sequence 92%. The Columbia Combined Cancer Panel assay led to the detection of a targetable variant in 48.7% of cases. However, although we show good clinical performance and diagnostic yield, third-party reimbursement has been poor. Reimbursement from government and third-party payers using the 81455 Current Procedural Terminology code was at 19.4% of billed costs, and 55% of cases were rejected on first submission. Likely contributing factors to this low level of reimbursement are the delays in valuation of the 81455 Current Procedural Terminology code and in establishing national or local coverage determinations. In the absence of additional demonstrations of clinical utility and improved patient outcomes, we expect the reimbursement environment will continue to limit the availability of this testing more broadly.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28024947     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  8 in total

1.  Low clinical adoption of tumor genomic profiling: cause for concern?

Authors:  Michael W Drazer; Randy F Sweis
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.448

2.  Pathway analysis of genomic pathology tests for prognostic cancer subtyping.

Authors:  Olga Lyudovyk; Yufeng Shen; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Susan J Hsiao; Mahesh M Mansukhani; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Financing and Reimbursement Models for Personalised Medicine: A Systematic Review to Identify Current Models and Future Options.

Authors:  Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova; James Buchanan; Heleen Vellekoop; Simone Huygens; Matthijs Versteegh; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken; László Szilberhorn; Tamás Zelei; Balázs Nagy; Sarah Wordsworth; Apostolos Tsiachristas
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Treatment recommendations to cancer patients in the context of FDA guidance for next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Grace K Dy; Mary K Nesline; Antonios Papanicolau-Sengos; Paul DePietro; Charles M LeVea; Amy Early; Hongbin Chen; Anne Grand'Maison; Patrick Boland; Marc S Ernstoff; Stephen Edge; Stacey Akers; Mateusz Opyrchal; Gurkamal Chatta; Kunle Odunsi; Sarabjot Pabla; Jeffrey M Conroy; Sean T Glenn; Hanchun T DeFedericis; Blake Burgher; Jonathan Andreas; Vincent Giamo; Maochun Qin; Yirong Wang; Kazunori Kanehira; Felicia L Lenzo; Peter Frederick; Shashikant Lele; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Boris Kuvshinoff; Carl Morrison
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Clinically Integrated Molecular Diagnostics in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Julia Thierauf; Nisha Ramamurthy; Vickie Y Jo; Hayley Robinson; Ryan P Frazier; Jonathan Gonzalez; Maciej Pacula; Enrique Dominguez Meneses; Vania Nose; Valentina Nardi; Dora Dias-Santagata; Long P Le; Derrick T Lin; William C Faquin; Lori J Wirth; Jochen Hess; A John Iafrate; Jochen K Lennerz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-29

6.  Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study.

Authors:  Dohee Kwon; Binnari Kim; Hyeong Chan Shin; Eun Ji Kim; Sang Yun Ha; Kee-Taek Jang; Seung Tae Kim; Jeeyun Lee; Won Ki Kang; Joon Oh Park; Kyoung-Mee Kim
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Pineal region ganglioglioma: A neoplasm with a bimodal age distribution.

Authors:  Osama A Al-Dalahmah; Linda Wang; Susan J Hsiao; Chun-Chieh Lin; Mahesh M Mansukhani; Peter Canoll; Jeffrey N Bruce; George Zanazzi
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-06-10

8.  Impact and Diagnostic Gaps of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Real-World Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Aditi P Singh; Elaine Shum; Lakshmi Rajdev; Haiying Cheng; Sanjay Goel; Roman Perez-Soler; Balazs Halmos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.