Literature DB >> 28024549

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiac Critical Care: A State of the Art Review and Algorithm for Device Selection.

A Dave Nagpal1, Rohit K Singal2, Rakesh C Arora2, Yoan Lamarche3.   

Abstract

With more than 60 years of continuous development and improvement, a variety of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and implantation strategies exist, each with unique advantages and disadvantages. A thorough understanding of each available device is essential for optimizing patient outcomes in a fiscally responsible manner. In this state of the art review we examine the entire range of commonly available peripheral and centrally cannulated temporary MCS devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps, the Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) family of microaxial pumps, the TandemHeart (CardiacAssist Inc, Pittsburg, PA) pump and percutaneous cannulas, centrally cannulated centrifugal pumps such as the CentriMag (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA/St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN/Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) and Rotaflow (Maquet Holding BV & Co KG, Rastatt Germany), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Several factors need detailed consideration when contemplating MCS in any given patient, mandating a balanced, algorithmic approach for these sick patients. In this review we describe our approach to MCS, and emphasize the need for multidisciplinary input to consider patient-related, logistical, and institutional factors. Evidence is summarized and referenced where available, but because of the lack of high-quality evidence, current best practice is described. Future directions for investigation are discussed, which will better define patient and device selection, and optimize MCS-specific patient care protocols.
Copyright © 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28024549     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  5 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular distension and venting strategies for patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Marisa Cevasco; Hiroo Takayama; Masahiko Ando; Arthur R Garan; Yoshifumi Naka; Koji Takeda
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Determinants of survival and favorable neurologic outcomes in ischemic heart disease treated by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Keisuke Yonezu; Kenichi Sakakura; Yusuke Watanabe; Yousuke Taniguchi; Kei Yamamoto; Hiroshi Wada; Shin-Ichi Momomura; Hideo Fujita
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Short-term mechanical circulatory support as bridge to heart transplantation: paracorporeal ventricular assist device as alternative to extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Sandro Sponga; Giovanni Benedetti; Ugolino Livi
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

Review 4.  How New Support Devices Change Critical Care Delivery.

Authors:  Asma Zainab; Divina Tuazon; Faisal Uddin; Iqbal Ratnani
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Decompensated Heart Failure.

Authors:  Tarique Al Musa; Colin Dominic Chue; Hoong Sern Lim
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.