Literature DB >> 28024402

Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Applied to Protein Homology Models.

Daniel Cappel1, Michelle Lynn Hall2, Eelke B Lenselink3, Thijs Beuming2, Jun Qi4, James Bradner4, Woody Sherman2.   

Abstract

A significant challenge and potential high-value application of computer-aided drug design is the accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities. Free energy perturbation (FEP) using molecular dynamics (MD) sampling is among the most suitable approaches to achieve accurate binding free energy predictions, due to the rigorous statistical framework of the methodology, correct representation of the energetics, and thorough treatment of the important degrees of freedom in the system (including explicit waters). Recent advances in sampling methods and force fields coupled with vast increases in computational resources have made FEP a viable technology to drive hit-to-lead and lead optimization, allowing for more efficient cycles of medicinal chemistry and the possibility to explore much larger chemical spaces. However, previous FEP applications have focused on systems with high-resolution crystal structures of the target as starting points-something that is not always available in drug discovery projects. As such, the ability to apply FEP on homology models would greatly expand the domain of applicability of FEP in drug discovery. In this work we apply a particular implementation of FEP, called FEP+, on congeneric ligand series binding to four diverse targets: a kinase (Tyk2), an epigenetic bromodomain (BRD4), a transmembrane GPCR (A2A), and a protein-protein interaction interface (BCL-2 family protein MCL-1). We apply FEP+ using both crystal structures and homology models as starting points and find that the performance using homology models is generally on a par with the results when using crystal structures. The robustness of the calculations to structural variations in the input models can likely be attributed to the conformational sampling in the molecular dynamics simulations, which allows the modeled receptor to adapt to the "real" conformation for each ligand in the series. This work exemplifies the advantages of using all-atom simulation methods with full system flexibility and offers promise for the general application of FEP to homology models, although additional validation studies should be performed to further understand the limitations of the method and the scenarios where FEP will work best.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28024402      PMCID: PMC5777225          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  61 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Are free energy calculations useful in practice? A comparison with rapid scoring functions for the p38 MAP kinase protein system.

Authors:  D A Pearlman; P S Charifson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

4.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ferrari; Binqing Q Wei; Luca Costantino; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Soft-core potentials in thermodynamic integration: comparing one- and two-step transformations.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; InSuk Joung; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  FEP-guided selection of bicyclic heterocycles in lead optimization for non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  Joseph T Kim; Andrew D Hamilton; Christopher M Bailey; Robert A Domaoal; Robert A Domoal; Ligong Wang; Karen S Anderson; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Exploring hierarchical refinement techniques for induced fit docking with protein and ligand flexibility.

Authors:  Kenneth W Borrelli; Benjamin Cossins; Victor Guallar
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Lead optimization of a 4-aminopyridine benzamide scaffold to identify potent, selective, and orally bioavailable TYK2 inhibitors.

Authors:  Jun Liang; Anne van Abbema; Mercedesz Balazs; Kathy Barrett; Leo Berezhkovsky; Wade Blair; Christine Chang; Donnie Delarosa; Jason DeVoss; Jim Driscoll; Charles Eigenbrot; Nico Ghilardi; Paul Gibbons; Jason Halladay; Adam Johnson; Pawan Bir Kohli; Yingjie Lai; Yanzhou Liu; Joseph Lyssikatos; Priscilla Mantik; Kapil Menghrajani; Jeremy Murray; Ivan Peng; Amy Sambrone; Steven Shia; Young Shin; Jan Smith; Sue Sohn; Vickie Tsui; Mark Ultsch; Lawren C Wu; Yisong Xiao; Wenqian Yang; Judy Young; Birong Zhang; Bing-yan Zhu; Steven Magnuson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Discovery of novel small-molecule inhibitors of BRD4 using structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Lewis R Vidler; Panagis Filippakopoulos; Oleg Fedorov; Sarah Picaud; Sarah Martin; Michael Tomsett; Hannah Woodward; Nathan Brown; Stefan Knapp; Swen Hoelder
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  13 in total

1.  Elucidating the inhibition of peptidoglycan biosynthesis in Staphylococcus aureus by albocycline, a macrolactone isolated from Streptomyces maizeus.

Authors:  Hai Liang; Guangfeng Zhou; Yunhui Ge; Elizabeth A D'Ambrosio; Tess M Eidem; Catlyn Blanchard; Cindy Shehatou; Vijay K Chatare; Paul M Dunman; Ann M Valentine; Vincent A Voelz; Catherine L Grimes; Rodrigo B Andrade
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Molecular Modeling of Drug-Transporter Interactions-An International Transporter Consortium Perspective.

Authors:  Avner Schlessinger; Matthew A Welch; Herman van Vlijmen; Ken Korzekwa; Peter W Swaan; Pär Matsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Alchemical Free Energy Calculations to Investigate Protein-Protein Interactions: the Case of the CDC42/PAK1 Complex.

Authors:  Maria Antonietta La Serra; Pietro Vidossich; Isabella Acquistapace; Anand K Ganesan; Marco De Vivo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.162

Review 4.  Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Drug-Target Binding by Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Sergio Decherchi; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  Molecular Simulations and Drug Discovery of Adenosine Receptors.

Authors:  Jinan Wang; Apurba Bhattarai; Hung N Do; Sana Akhter; Yinglong Miao
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.

Authors:  Thomas Coudrat; John Simms; Arthur Christopoulos; Denise Wootten; Patrick M Sexton
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Iodide Binding in Sodium-Coupled Cotransporters.

Authors:  Ariela Vergara-Jaque; Peying Fong; Jeffrey Comer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Predicting resistance of clinical Abl mutations to targeted kinase inhibitors using alchemical free-energy calculations.

Authors:  Kevin Hauser; Christopher Negron; Steven K Albanese; Soumya Ray; Thomas Steinbrecher; Robert Abel; John D Chodera; Lingle Wang
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-06-13

9.  Identification of a Novel Class of BRD4 Inhibitors by Computational Screening and Binding Simulations.

Authors:  Bryce K Allen; Saurabh Mehta; Stuart W J Ember; Jin-Yi Zhu; Ernst Schönbrunn; Nagi G Ayad; Stephan C Schürer
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-08-21

10.  Hit-to-lead and lead optimization binding free energy calculations for G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Shunzhou Wan; Andrew Potterton; Fouad S Husseini; David W Wright; Alexander Heifetz; Maciej Malawski; Andrea Townsend-Nicholson; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.