Julia C Zwick1, Larissa Wolkenstein2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: larissa.wolkenstein@psy.lmu.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examined whether acutely (aMDD) and remitted depressed patients (rMDD) show deficits in the two aspects of social cognition - facial emotion recognition (FER) and reasoning - when using ecologically valid material. Furthermore, we examined whether reduced facial mimicry mediates the association between depressive symptoms and FER, and whether FER deficits and reasoning deficits are associated. METHOD: In 42 aMDD, 43 rMDD, and 39 healthy controls (HC) FER was assessed using stimuli from the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set, reasoning by the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition. Furthermore, the activity of Zygomaticus Major and Corrugator supercilii were recorded. RESULTS: aMDD recognized happy faces less accurately, were less confident recognizing happiness and anger and found it more difficult to recognize happiness, anger and fear than HC. rMDD were less confident recognizing anger and found it more difficult to recognize happiness, anger and fear than HC. Reduced mimicry did not explain FER deficits. aMDD but not rMDD showed impaired reasoning. LIMITATIONS: The stimulus material was comparably easy to decode. Therefore, it is possible that the FER deficits of aMDD and rMDD patients are more pronounced than demonstrated in this study. CONCLUSIONS: aMDD show deficits in FER and reasoning, whereas rMDD only show mild impairments in the recognition of emotional expressions. There must be other processes - besides mimicry - that serve the accurate recognition of emotional facial expressions.
BACKGROUND: This study examined whether acutely (aMDD) and remitted depressedpatients (rMDD) show deficits in the two aspects of social cognition - facial emotion recognition (FER) and reasoning - when using ecologically valid material. Furthermore, we examined whether reduced facial mimicry mediates the association between depressive symptoms and FER, and whether FER deficits and reasoning deficits are associated. METHOD: In 42 aMDD, 43 rMDD, and 39 healthy controls (HC) FER was assessed using stimuli from the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set, reasoning by the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition. Furthermore, the activity of Zygomaticus Major and Corrugator supercilii were recorded. RESULTS:aMDD recognized happy faces less accurately, were less confident recognizing happiness and anger and found it more difficult to recognize happiness, anger and fear than HC. rMDD were less confident recognizing anger and found it more difficult to recognize happiness, anger and fear than HC. Reduced mimicry did not explain FER deficits. aMDD but not rMDD showed impaired reasoning. LIMITATIONS: The stimulus material was comparably easy to decode. Therefore, it is possible that the FER deficits of aMDD and rMDDpatients are more pronounced than demonstrated in this study. CONCLUSIONS:aMDD show deficits in FER and reasoning, whereas rMDD only show mild impairments in the recognition of emotional expressions. There must be other processes - besides mimicry - that serve the accurate recognition of emotional facial expressions.
Authors: Thomas Van Vleet; Alit Stark-Inbar; Michael M Merzenich; Joshua T Jordan; Deanna L Wallace; Morgan B Lee; Heather E Dawes; Edward F Chang; Mor Nahum Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Tai-Ling Liu; Peng-Wei Wang; Yi-Hsin Connie Yang; Gary Chon-Wen Shyi; Cheng-Fang Yen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ma Ruihua; Zhao Meng; Chen Nan; Liu Panqi; Guo Hua; Liu Sijia; Shi Jing; Zhao Ke; Tan Yunlong; Tan Shuping; Yang Fude; Tian Li; Wang Zhiren Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-07-14