Fumiaki Taniguchi1, Natsuki Koike2, Tadayuki Kikukawa3, Maki Yabuta3, Masami Yamaguchi3, Emi Adachi4, Takeo Nakayama5. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takanohara Central Hospital, Nara City, Nara, Japan. Electronic address: ftaniguc@gmail.com. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nara Medical University, Kashiwara City, Nara, Japan. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takanohara Central Hospital, Nara City, Nara, Japan. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Takanohara Central Hospital, Nara City, Nara, Japan; Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto City, Kyoto, Japan. 5. Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto City, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes following conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) (C-LH) versus the combination method of LH plus laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) (LH+LM) for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. STUDY DESIGN: This study was performed in 56 patients (uterine weights ≥500g) who underwent either C-LH or LH+LM performed by the same surgeon between May 2010 and May 2016. LH+LM was performed when C-LH was problematic because of poor visibility and/or mobility due to uterine fibroids. RESULTS: The C-LH and LH+LM groups consisted of 27 (48%) and 29 (52%) patients, respectively. The clinical characteristics of patients differed significantly only in the median sizes of the dominant fibroid. The sizes of the dominant fibroid in the C-LH and LH+LM groups were 9.5cm and 10.7cm (P=0.04), respectively. Regarding the surgical outcomes for the C-LH and LH+LM groups, the median uterine weights were 558g and 737g (P=0.03), respectively, the median operating times were 156min and 173min (P=0.23), respectively, and the median intraoperative blood losses were 150g and 300g (P=0.0004), respectively. In all patients, LH was performed without conversion to laparotomy and there were no cases of bladder, ureteral, or gastrointestinal tract injury. There were no postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo scale≥III in either group. CONCLUSIONS: When C-LH cannot be performed because of large uterine fibroids that cause poor visibility and/or mobility, LH+LM may allow the procedure to be successfully completed without conversion to laparotomy. However, the latter approach increases the risk for intraoperative blood loss.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes following conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) (C-LH) versus the combination method of LH plus laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) (LH+LM) for the treatment of large uterine fibroids. STUDY DESIGN: This study was performed in 56 patients (uterine weights ≥500g) who underwent either C-LH or LH+LM performed by the same surgeon between May 2010 and May 2016. LH+LM was performed when C-LH was problematic because of poor visibility and/or mobility due to uterine fibroids. RESULTS: The C-LH and LH+LM groups consisted of 27 (48%) and 29 (52%) patients, respectively. The clinical characteristics of patients differed significantly only in the median sizes of the dominant fibroid. The sizes of the dominant fibroid in the C-LH and LH+LM groups were 9.5cm and 10.7cm (P=0.04), respectively. Regarding the surgical outcomes for the C-LH and LH+LM groups, the median uterine weights were 558g and 737g (P=0.03), respectively, the median operating times were 156min and 173min (P=0.23), respectively, and the median intraoperative blood losses were 150g and 300g (P=0.0004), respectively. In all patients, LH was performed without conversion to laparotomy and there were no cases of bladder, ureteral, or gastrointestinal tract injury. There were no postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo scale≥III in either group. CONCLUSIONS: When C-LH cannot be performed because of large uterine fibroids that cause poor visibility and/or mobility, LH+LM may allow the procedure to be successfully completed without conversion to laparotomy. However, the latter approach increases the risk for intraoperative blood loss.