| Literature DB >> 28024105 |
Henriette Selck1, Peter B Adamsen2, Thomas Backhaus3, Gary T Banta1, Peter K H Bruce4, G Allen Burton5, Michael B Butts6, Eva Boegh1, John J Clague7, Khuong V Dinh8, Neelke Doorn9, Jonas S Gunnarsson4, Henrik Hauggaard-Nielsen1, Charles Hazlerigg10, Agnieszka D Hunka11, John Jensen12, Yan Lin13, Susana Loureiro14, Simona Miraglia8, Wayne R Munns15, Farrokh Nadim16, Annemette Palmqvist1, Robert A Rämö4, Lauren P Seaby1, Kristian Syberg1, Stine R Tangaa1, Amalie Thit1, Ronja Windfeld1, Maciej Zalewski17, Peter M Chapman18.
Abstract
Roskilde University (Denmark) hosted a November 2015 workshop, Environmental Risk-Assessing and Managing Multiple Risks in a Changing World. This Focus article presents the consensus recommendations of 30 attendees from 9 countries regarding implementation of a common currency (ecosystem services) for holistic environmental risk assessment and management; improvements to risk assessment and management in a complex, human-modified, and changing world; appropriate development of protection goals in a 2-stage process; dealing with societal issues; risk-management information needs; conducting risk assessment of risk management; and development of adaptive and flexible regulatory systems. The authors encourage both cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to address their 10 recommendations: 1) adopt ecosystem services as a common currency for risk assessment and management; 2) consider cumulative stressors (chemical and nonchemical) and determine which dominate to best manage and restore ecosystem services; 3) fully integrate risk managers and communities of interest into the risk-assessment process; 4) fully integrate risk assessors and communities of interest into the risk-management process; 5) consider socioeconomics and increased transparency in both risk assessment and risk management; 6) recognize the ethical rights of humans and ecosystems to an adequate level of protection; 7) determine relevant reference conditions and the proper ecological context for assessments in human-modified systems; 8) assess risks and benefits to humans and the ecosystem and consider unintended consequences of management actions; 9) avoid excessive conservatism or possible underprotection resulting from sole reliance on binary, numerical benchmarks; and 10) develop adaptive risk-management and regulatory goals based on ranges of uncertainty. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:7-16.Entities:
Keywords: Climate change; Ecosystem services; Multiple environmental stressors; Risk assessment; Risk management; Wicked problems
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28024105 PMCID: PMC6130322 DOI: 10.1002/etc.3513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Toxicol Chem ISSN: 0730-7268 Impact factor: 3.742