Literature DB >> 28019056

The influence of collagen membrane and autogenous bone chips on bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla: a preclinical study.

Simone F M Janner1,2, Dieter D Bosshardt3, David L Cochran2, Vivianne Chappuis1, Guy Huynh-Ba2, Archie A Jones2, Daniel Buser1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a resorbable collagen membrane and autogenous bone chips combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) on the healing of buccal dehiscence-type defects.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The second incisors and the first premolars were extracted in the maxilla of eight mongrels. Reduced diameter, bone-level implants were placed 5 weeks later. Standardized buccal dehiscence-type defects were created and grafted at implant surgery. According to an allocation algorithm, the graft composition of each of the four maxillary sites was DBBM + membrane (group D + M), autogenous bone chips + DBBM + membrane (group A + D + M), DBBM alone (group D) or autogenous bone chips + DBBM (group A + D). Four animals were sacrificed after 3 weeks of healing and four animals after 12 weeks. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed on oro-facial sections.
RESULTS: The pattern of bone formation and resorption within the grafted area showed high variability among the same group and healing time. The histomorphometric analysis of the 3-week specimens showed a positive effect of autogenous bone chips on both implant osseointegration and bone formation into the grafted region (P < 0.05). The presence of the collagen membrane correlated with greater bone formation around the DBBM particles and greater bone formation in the grafted region after 12 weeks of healing (P < 0.05). The oro-facial width of the augmented region at the level of the implant shoulder was significantly reduced in cases where damage of the protection splints occurred in the first week of healing (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of autogenous bone chips and the presence of the collagen membrane increased bone formation around DBBM particles. Wound protection from mechanical noxa during early healing may be critical for bone formation within the grafted area.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior maxilla; autogenous bone; bone healing; bovine bone; collagen membrane; dehiscence defect; dental implant; dog; early implant placement; guided bone regeneration; osseointegration; titanium-zirconium alloy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28019056     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

Review 1.  How efficacious is the combination of substitute bone graft with autogenous bone graft in comparison with substitute bone graft alone in the horizontal bone gain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Meza-Mauricio; Camila-Pinheiro Furquim; Leonardo-Delfino Dos Reis; Marlon-Marx-Hilariano Maximiano; Gerardo Mendoza-Azpur; Francisco-Wilker-Mustafa-Gomes Muniz; Giulio Rasperini; Marcelo Faveri
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-08-01

2.  Evidence that Osteocytes in Autogenous Bone Fragments can Repair Disrupted Canalicular Networks and Connect with Osteocytes in de novo Formed Bone on the Fragment Surface.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with versus without resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchi; Elisabetta Vignudelli; Debora Franceschi; Emanuele Randellini; Giuseppe Lizio; Antonino Fiorino; Giuseppe Corinaldesi
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.021

4.  The Effect of Coronal Implant Design and Drilling Protocol on Bone-to-Implant Contact: A 3-Month Study in the Minipig Calvarium.

Authors:  Omer Cohen; Dieter D Bosshardt; Evegeny Weinberg; Gil Slutzkey; Ofer Moses
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Comparison of the Bone Harvesting Capacity of an Intraoral Bone Harvesting Device and Three Different Implant Drills.

Authors:  Hyun-Chang Lim; Kyung-In Ha; Ji-Youn Hong; Ji-Young Han; Seung-Il Shin; Seung-Yun Shin; Yeek Herr; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Facial Bone Reconstruction Using both Marine or Non-Marine Bone Substitutes: Evaluation of Current Outcomes in a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Marco Cicciù; Gabriele Cervino; Alan Scott Herford; Fausto Famà; Ennio Bramanti; Luca Fiorillo; Floriana Lauritano; Sergio Sambataro; Giuseppe Troiano; Luigi Laino
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 5.118

7.  Bone Augmentation of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects Using Multilaminated Small Intestinal Submucosa as a Barrier Membrane: An Experimental Study in Dogs.

Authors:  Siwen Wang; Weiyi Wu; Yuhua Liu; Xinzhi Wang; Lin Tang; Pengyue You; Jianmin Han; Bowen Li; Yi Zhang; Mei Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.