Literature DB >> 28019048

Temporal and spatial changes in gene expression, metabolite accumulation and phytohormone content in rice seedlings grown under drought stress conditions.

Daisuke Todaka1, Yu Zhao1, Takuya Yoshida1,2, Madoka Kudo1, Satoshi Kidokoro1, Junya Mizoi1, Ken-Suke Kodaira1, Yumiko Takebayashi3, Mikiko Kojima3, Hitoshi Sakakibara3, Kiminori Toyooka4, Mayuko Sato4, Alisdair R Fernie2, Kazuo Shinozaki5, Kazuko Yamaguchi-Shinozaki1.   

Abstract

In order to analyze the molecular mechanisms underlying the responses of plants to different levels of drought stress, we developed a soil matric potential (SMP)-based irrigation system that precisely controls soil moisture. Using this system, rice seedlings were grown under three different drought levels, denoted Md1, Md2 and Md3, with SMP values set to -9.8, -31.0 and -309.9 kPa, respectively. Although the Md1 treatment did not alter the visible phenotype, the Md2 treatment caused stomatal closure and shoot growth retardation (SGR). The Md3 treatment markedly induced SGR, without inhibition of photosynthesis. More severe drought (Sds) treatment, under which irrigation was terminated, resulted in the wilting of leaves and inhibition of photosynthesis. Metabolome analysis revealed the accumulation of primary sugars under Md3 and Sds and of most amino acids under Sds. The starch content was increased under Md3 and decreased under Sds. Transcriptome data showed that the expression profiles of associated genes supported the observed changes in photosynthesis and metabolites, suggesting that the time lag from SGR to inhibition of photosynthesis might lead to the accumulation of photosynthates under Md3, which can be used as osmolytes under Sds. To gain further insight into the observed SGR, transcriptome and hormonome analyses were performed in specific tissues. The results showed specific decreases in indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and cytokinin levels in Md2-, Md3- and Sds-treated shoot bases, though the expression levels of hormone metabolism-related genes were not reflected in IAA and cytokinin contents. These observations suggest that drought stress affects the distribution or degradation of cytokinin and IAA molecules.
© 2016 The Authors The Plant Journal © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  different levels of drought; hormonome analyses; metabolome analysis; rice shoot growth; shoot apical meristem; tissue-specific transcriptome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28019048     DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  40 in total

1.  Root Engineering in Barley: Increasing Cytokinin Degradation Produces a Larger Root System, Mineral Enrichment in the Shoot and Improved Drought Tolerance.

Authors:  Eswarayya Ramireddy; Seyed A Hosseini; Kai Eggert; Sabine Gillandt; Heike Gnad; Nicolaus von Wirén; Thomas Schmülling
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Ethanol treatment enhances drought stress avoidance in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).

Authors:  Anh Thu Vu; Yoshinori Utsumi; Chikako Utsumi; Maho Tanaka; Satoshi Takahashi; Daisuke Todaka; Yuri Kanno; Mitsunori Seo; Eigo Ando; Kaori Sako; Khurram Bashir; Toshinori Kinoshita; Xuan Hoi Pham; Motoaki Seki
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Transcriptome and metabolome profiling of interspecific CSSLs reveals general and specific mechanisms of drought resistance in cotton.

Authors:  Bei Han; Fengjiao Wang; Zhilin Liu; Lin Chen; Dandan Yue; Weinan Sun; Zhongxu Lin; Xianlong Zhang; Xiaofeng Zhou; Xiyan Yang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 5.574

4.  MPK3/6-induced degradation of ARR1/10/12 promotes salt tolerance in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Zhenwei Yan; Junxia Wang; Fengxia Wang; Chuantian Xie; Bingsheng Lv; Zipeng Yu; Shaojun Dai; Xia Liu; Guangmin Xia; Huiyu Tian; Cuiling Li; Zhaojun Ding
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 9.071

5.  Ethanol induces heat tolerance in plants by stimulating unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Akihiro Matsui; Daisuke Todaka; Maho Tanaka; Kayoko Mizunashi; Satoshi Takahashi; Yuji Sunaoshi; Yuuri Tsuboi; Junko Ishida; Khurram Bashir; Jun Kikuchi; Miyako Kusano; Makoto Kobayashi; Kanako Kawaura; Motoaki Seki
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Transcriptomic, Hormonomic and Metabolomic Analyses Highlighted the Common Modules Related to Photosynthesis, Sugar Metabolism and Cell Division in Parthenocarpic Tomato Fruits during Early Fruit Set.

Authors:  Miyako Kusano; Kanjana Worarad; Atsushi Fukushima; Ken Kamiya; Yuka Mitani; Yozo Okazaki; Yasuhiro Higashi; Ryo Nakabayashi; Makoto Kobayashi; Tetsuya Mori; Tomoko Nishizawa; Yumiko Takebayashi; Mikiko Kojima; Hitoshi Sakakibara; Kazuki Saito; Shuhei Hao; Yoshihito Shinozaki; Yoshihiro Okabe; Junji Kimbara; Tohru Ariizumi; Hiroshi Ezura
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 7.666

7.  Thiamin stimulates growth, yield quality and key biochemical processes of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. Botrytis) under arid conditions.

Authors:  Munifa Jabeen; Nudrat Aisha Akram; Muhammad Ashraf; Anshika Tyagi; Mohamed A El-Sheikh; Parvaiz Ahmad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 8.  Amino Acids in Rice Grains and Their Regulation by Polyamines and Phytohormones.

Authors:  Jianchang Yang; Yujiao Zhou; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

9.  Transcriptional and metabolic changes in the desiccation tolerant plant Craterostigma plantagineum during recurrent exposures to dehydration.

Authors:  Xun Liu; Dinakar Challabathula; Wenli Quan; Dorothea Bartels
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  Transcriptome profiling illustrates expression signatures of dehydration tolerance in developing grasspea seedlings.

Authors:  Divya Rathi; Saurabh Gayali; Akanksha Pareek; Subhra Chakraborty; Niranjan Chakraborty
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.