| Literature DB >> 28018949 |
Christian Meinert1, Franziska Kohse2, Ilka Böhme2, Florian Gembardt3, Anja Tetzner4, Thomas Wieland5, Barry Greenberg6, Thomas Walther7.
Abstract
In 2016, Meinert et al. (doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.09.020) published the first 25 proteins in a protein array regulated in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) by the heptapeptide angiotensin (Ang)-(1-7) and the first 10 intracellular signaling cascades at different time points. This supporting data article shows further proteins and pathways stimulated by Ang-(1-7) in human endothelial cells at time points of 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 9 h. HUVECs were stimulated with Ang-(1-7), and regulated proteins were identified via antibody microarray. Bioinformatics software IPA was used for association of regulated proteins to metabolic pathways.Entities:
Keywords: Angiotensin-(1-7); Antibody microarray; Cell signaling; Endothelium; Renin-Angiotensin system
Year: 2016 PMID: 28018949 PMCID: PMC5167237 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.12.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
The proteins ranked 26–100 based on the detected fold change values after 1 h incubation of HUVEC with 10−7 M Ang-(1–7). The order of the numbers is oriented on the highest single value. Expression fold change lower than 1.5 is given in hyphen. Data that could not be detected is marked as n.d. Proteins marked in Italic show repeatedly identified differentially expressed proteins (RIDEPs). The mentioned dye indicates with which dye the unstimulated sample was labeled with.
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – |
The proteins ranked 26–100 based on the detected fold change values after 3 h incubation of HUVEC with 10−7 M Ang-(1–7). The order of the numbers is oriented on the highest single value. Expression fold change lower than 1.5 is given in hyphen. Data that could not be detected is marked as n.d. Proteins marked in Italic show repeatedly identified differentially expressed proteins (RIDEPs). The mentioned dye indicates which dye the unstimulated sample was labeled with.
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – |
The proteins ranked 26–31 based on the detected fold change values after 6 h incubation of HUVEC with 10−7 M Ang-(1–7). The order of the numbers is oriented on the highest single value. Expression fold change lower than 1.5 is given in hyphen. Data that could not be detected is marked as n.d. Proteins marked in Italic show repeatedly identified differentially expressed proteins (RIDEPs). The mentioned dye indicates which dye the unstimulated sample was labeled with.
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – |
The proteins ranked 26–86 based on the detected fold change values after 9 h incubation of HUVEC with 10−7 M Ang-(1–7). The order of the numbers is oriented on the highest single value. Expression fold change lower than 1.5 is given in hyphen. Data that could not be detected is marked as n.d. Proteins marked in Italic show repeatedly identified differentially expressed proteins (RIDEPs). The mentioned dye indicates which dye the unstimulated sample was labeled with.
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – | |||||
| – |
Metabolic pathways ranked position 11–25 (bold) using the p-values associated by the IPA software to each of the different antibody microarray sets (A: 1 h; B: 3 h; C: 6 h; D: 9 h). For completion, the ranking of the first ten pathways are also listed (in Italic). The ratio states the number of proteins detected in the microarray versus the total number of proteins being part of the particular pathway.
| Subject area | |
|---|---|
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |