| Literature DB >> 28018899 |
Lin Cheng1, Zhaoyu Qin2, Chaohai Zhang3, Huixuan Shi1, Kun Zhao3, Xiaoyu Xie4, Haibo Ma4.
Abstract
Octafluorocyclobutane, c-C4F8, and its derivatives are regarded as promising replacements of insulation gaseous SF6, which are currently widely used in electric equipment but suffer greatly from its greenhouse effect. Based on the recent finding that the dielectric and thermodynamics properties of insulating gases are greatly dependent on the molecule's microscopic electronic and vibrational parameters, in this work, we use density functional theory (DFT) to study the molecular structures, electron affinities, and IR-active vibrational frequencies as well as thermodynamic properties for c-C4F8 and a series of mono-, di-substituted c-C4F8 compounds. It is shown that DFT calculation of perfluoro-compounds is sensitive to the chosen functional. Although all chloro-substituted c-C4F8 molecules are found to have much larger electron affinities, only part of them have less IR intensity in the atmospheric IR "window" than c-C4F8. Such a study provides useful guideline for the pre-screening search for new insulation gases via electronic structure calculations.Entities:
Keywords: density functional theory; electron affinity; insulating gas; octafluorocyclobutane; vibrational frequency
Year: 2016 PMID: 28018899 PMCID: PMC5156735 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2016.00047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Optimized geometries for neutral c-C. 1: c-C4F8, D2 symmetry; 1−: c-C4, D4 symmetry; 2: c-C4F7Cl, C symmetry; 2−: c-C4F7Cl−, C symmetry; 3: c-C4F6Cl2(a), C symmetry; 3−: c-C4F6(a), C symmetry; 4: c-C4F6Cl2(b), C1 symmetry; 4−: c-C4F6(b), C1 symmetry; 5: c-C4F6Cl2(c), C2 symmetry; 5−: c-C4F6(c), C1 symmetry; 6: c-C4F6Cl2(d), C2 symmetry; 6−: c-C4F6(d), C symmetry; 7: c-C4F6Cl2(e), C symmetry; 7−: c-C4F6(e), C symmetry.
Figure 2Exchange-correlation functional and basis set test for DFT calculations of the adiabatic electron affinity energy (EA.
Structural information of optimized molecules by DFT calculation at M06-2X/6–311g+(3df) level.
| 164.4 | 180.0 | 9.5% | – | – | – | |
| 159.5 | 163.7 | 2.6% | 1.73 | 2.41 | 39.3% | |
| 158.7 | 163.6 | 3.1% | 1.74/1.75 | 1.71/2.48 | −1.7%/41.7% | |
| 157.4 | 161.1 | 2.4% | 1.73/1.74 | 1.78/2.38 | 2.9%/36.8% | |
| 157.3 | 161.7 | 2.8% | 1.73/1.73 | 1.84/2.37 | 6.4%/37.0% | |
| 156.3 | 163.1 | 4.4% | 1.73/1.73 | 1.76/2.40 | 1.7%/38.7% | |
| 158.0 | 162.0 | 2.5% | 1.73/1.74 | 1.77/2.39 | 2.3%/37.4% | |
Figure 3The frontier molecular orbitals for selected typical molecules (1, 2, 6).
Binding energies and dipole moments of optimized molecules by DFT calculations at M06-2X/6–311g+(3df) level.
| 54.09 | 0.000 | ||
| 52.59 | 0.576 | ||
| 51.23 | 0.650 | ||
| 51.06 | 1.055 | ||
| 51.08 | 0.575 | ||
| 51.08 | 0.751 | ||
| 51.09 | 0.245 |
c-C.
Adiabatic and vertical electron affinities of the neutral c-C.
| ωB97-XD | 0.61 | −1.56 | 1.80 | |
| M06-2X | 0.63 | −0.94 | 1.76 | |
| Exp. | 0.63 | – | – | |
| ωB97-XD | 1.30 | −0.69 | 3.68 | |
| M06-2X | 1.27 | −0.71 | 3.54 | |
| ωB97-XD | 1.56 | −0.35 | 3.85 | |
| M06-2X | 1.50 | −0.50 | 3.71 | |
| ωB97-XD | 1.32 | −0.41 | 3.62 | |
| M06-2X | 1.27 | −0.45 | 3.47 | |
| ωB97-XD | 1.38 | −0.49 | 3.61 | |
| M06-2X | 1.34 | −0.51 | 3.45 | |
| ωB97-XD | 1.31 | −0.44 | 3.60 | |
| M06-2X | 1.28 | −0.48 | 3.46 | |
| ωB97-XD | 1.28 | −0.48 | 3.62 | |
| M06-2X | 1.23 | −0.51 | 3.47 |
From Chang et al. (.
IR intensities by DFT calculations at M06-2X/6–311g+(3df) level.
| 1421.3 | 411.4 | 28.9 | |
| 3472.3 | 3347.4 | 96.4 | |
| 1292.1 | 407.6 | 31.5 | |
| 2230.5 | 1077.3 | 48.3 | |
| 1189.0 | 394.8 | 33.2 | |
| 2014.8 | 899.7 | 44.7 | |
| 1167.6 | 451.4 | 38.7 | |
| 2089.5 | 855.9 | 41.0 | |
| 1157.7 | 421.3 | 36.4 | |
| 2002.5 | 583.3 | 29.1 | |
| 1132.8 | 222.8 | 19.7 | |
| 1888.9 | 848.1 | 44.9 | |
| 1145.0 | 539.6 | 47.1 | |
| 1970.5 | 974.6 | 49.5 |
Zero-point vibrational energy (ZPVE) and entropy as well as heat capacity of .
| ZPVE/kcal × mol−1 | 30.8 | 29.6 | 28.5 | 28.4 | 28.4 | 28.4 | 28.4 | |
| Entropy/cal × mol−1×K−1 | Total | 95.0 | 101.0 | 102.2 | 102.0 | 101.3 | 101.5 | 102.3 |
| Trans. | 41.8 | 42.0 | 42.2 | 42.2 | 42.2 | 42.2 | 42.2 | |
| Rot. | 27.4 | 30.6 | 31.0 | 31.0 | 29.7 | 29.7 | 31.0 | |
| Vib. | 25.8 | 28.3 | 28.9 | 28.8 | 29.4 | 29.6 | 29.1 | |
| Heat Capacity/cal × mol−1×K−1 | Total | 35.3 | 36.4 | 37.4 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Trans. | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| Rot. | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| Vib. | 29.3 | 30.5 | 31.5 | 31.5 | 31.5 | 31.5 | 31.5 | |