BACKGROUND: Surveillance using coded administrative health data has shown that the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in Canada increased substantially between 1998 to 2008. These findings require an assumption that the validity of hypertension and diabetes coding is stable over time. We tested this assumption by examining temporal trends in the validity of coding for hypertension and diabetes in the Canadian hospital Discharge Abstract Database. METHODS: We used the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database, a clinical registry, as the reference standard to evaluate the validity of the Discharge Abstract Database in recording hypertension and diabetes in Alberta. The APPROACH database contains data for all Alberta residents who have undergone cardiac catheterization and includes prospective ascertainment of comorbid conditions before each procedure. We linked patient data between the 2 databases for 2002 to 2013 using patient provincial health number. Temporal trends in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Cohen κ were calculated for both hypertension and diabetes in the Discharge Abstract Database. RESULTS: We matched 63 483 patients between the APPROACH database and the Discharge Abstract Database. The validity of the Discharge Abstract Database for hypertension and diabetes remained mostly consistent over time. Between 2002 and 2013, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value ranged from 66% to 87% for hypertension and from 81% to 98% for diabetes; the corresponding κ scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.62 and from 0.80 to 0.89. No significant differences in the validity of coding were found across age, sex or hospital location subgroups. INTERPRETATION: The validity of coding for hypertension and diabetes in the Discharge Abstract Database remained fairly consistent between 2002 and 2013. Our findings support the use of the Discharge Abstract Database for hypertension and diabetes surveillance in hospital settings.
BACKGROUND: Surveillance using coded administrative health data has shown that the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in Canada increased substantially between 1998 to 2008. These findings require an assumption that the validity of hypertension and diabetes coding is stable over time. We tested this assumption by examining temporal trends in the validity of coding for hypertension and diabetes in the Canadian hospital Discharge Abstract Database. METHODS: We used the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database, a clinical registry, as the reference standard to evaluate the validity of the Discharge Abstract Database in recording hypertension and diabetes in Alberta. The APPROACH database contains data for all Alberta residents who have undergone cardiac catheterization and includes prospective ascertainment of comorbid conditions before each procedure. We linked patient data between the 2 databases for 2002 to 2013 using patient provincial health number. Temporal trends in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Cohen κ were calculated for both hypertension and diabetes in the Discharge Abstract Database. RESULTS: We matched 63 483 patients between the APPROACH database and the Discharge Abstract Database. The validity of the Discharge Abstract Database for hypertension and diabetes remained mostly consistent over time. Between 2002 and 2013, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value ranged from 66% to 87% for hypertension and from 81% to 98% for diabetes; the corresponding κ scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.62 and from 0.80 to 0.89. No significant differences in the validity of coding were found across age, sex or hospital location subgroups. INTERPRETATION: The validity of coding for hypertension and diabetes in the Discharge Abstract Database remained fairly consistent between 2002 and 2013. Our findings support the use of the Discharge Abstract Database for hypertension and diabetes surveillance in hospital settings.
Authors: Hude Quan; Nadia Khan; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Karen Tu; Guanmin Chen; Norm Campbell; Michael D Hill; William A Ghali; Finlay A McAlister Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Jean-Marie Januel; Jean-Christophe Luthi; Hude Quan; François Borst; Patrick Taffé; William A Ghali; Bernard Burnand Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Mingkai Peng; Guanmin Chen; Lisa M Lix; Finlay A McAlister; Karen Tu; Norm R Campbell; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Lawrence W Svenson; Hude Quan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Danielle A Southern; Colleen M Norris; Hude Quan; Fiona M Shrive; P Diane Galbraith; Karin Humphries; Min Gao; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2008-01-23 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Ana López-de-Andrés; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Maria A Martínez-Huedo; Manuel Villanueva-Martinez; Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo; Rodrigo Jiménez-García Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana López-de-Andrés; Napoleon Perez-Farinos; Javier de Miguel-Díez; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Isabel Jiménez-Trujillo; Manuel Méndez-Bailón; José M de Miguel-Yanes; Rodrigo Jiménez-García Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ni Gusti Ayu Nanditha; Martin St-Jean; Hiwot Tafessu; Silvia A Guillemi; Mark W Hull; Michelle Lu; Bonnie Henry; Rolando Barrios; Julio S G Montaner; Viviane D Lima Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Seungwon Lee; Bing Li; Elliot A Martin; Adam G D'Souza; Jason Jiang; Chelsea Doktorchik; Danielle A Southern; Joon Lee; Natalie Wiebe; Hude Quan; Cathy A Eastwood Journal: CJC Open Date: 2020-12-27