| Literature DB >> 28018784 |
Guang Wen1, Jing Di2, Qian Li3, Jianling Chen3, Ling Jin3, Cheng Wang3, Sanqing Xu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The new method described here is highly efficient in transferring microinjected mouse eggs (MEs) through the bursa membrane of a surrogate mother mouse to the ampulla of the oviduct without damaging the blood vessels on the bursa membrane.Entities:
Keywords: Generation of transgenic/knockdown mice; Microinjection of eggs; New device; Transgenic/knockout mice
Year: 2016 PMID: 28018784 PMCID: PMC5138171 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3760-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1Microinjected egg transfer assembly. Left panel Drill head assembly holding a fine forceps (left) and a fine needle (right) [scale bar 20 mm]. Right panel The drill head assembly with the fine forceps held in the holder of the light housing clamp of a dissecting light microscope (Scale bar 30 mm)
Fig. 2Drill head assembly holding a self-closing fine forceps can be alternatively hooked/tied up to an appropriate size of clamp screwed to any light stand with folding segments (Scale bar 30 mm)
Fig. 3This video-clip link demonstrates that there is no breeding problem when the bursa membrane/ampulla was inserted with pipet tip containing microinjected eggs. A = oviduct; B = ampulla/bursa membrane; C = fine forceps; D = pipet tip containing MEs
Fig. 4Diagram of a new device and approach to transfer microinjected eggs to mouse ampulla for increased production of transgenic mice. A = bursa membrane; B = blood vessel of bursa membrane; C = microinjected egg; D = pipet tip; E = small hole made for inserting pipet tip; F = surgical hole in mouse body for pulling out ovary, oviduct, and uterus; G = uterus; H = ampulla of oviduct; I = oviduct; J = fine forceps; K = rubber tube attached to pipet; L = pipet end for attaching rubber tube of mouthpiece; M = rubber tube attached to mouthpiece; N = mouth piece; O = fat pad; P = top of infundibulum; Q = ovary; R = head of drill to hold fine forceps; S = drill head assembly
Numbers of pups delivered by surrogate mother mice that received microinjected eggs with traditional and new transfer methods
| Traditional method | New method | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pups born | Numbers of eggs transferred | % of pups born | Pups born | Numbers of eggs transferred | % of pups born |
| 2 | 7 | 28.5% | 6 | 8 | 75% |
| 1 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 13 | 70 |
| 1 | 8 | 12.5 | 9 | 14 | 64 |
| 5 | 9 | 55 | 5 | 7 | 71.4 |
| Total 9 | 34 | 26.5% | 29 | 42 | 69.0% |
Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney-test analysis was performed. The z = − 2.309 and p = 0.0209 indicate that the difference between the numbers of pups born in the traditional and the new transferal method is significant