Literature DB >> 28018598

CD34 and CD38 are prognostic biomarkers for acute B lymphoblastic leukemia.

Zhiwu Jiang1, Di Wu1, Shouheng Lin1, Peng Li1.   

Abstract

CD34 and CD38 proteins are usually used as surface markers to identify HSCs and Leukemic stem cells. However, there have been cases that lacked CD34 or CD38 protein but still had leukemia initiating capacity in B-ALL suggesting the restrictive of these two markers. CD34 and CD38 expression were detected in most B-ALL and can serve as a specific biomarker for the prognosis of this subset of leukemia. Lack of CD34 or high CD38 expression is associated with favorable prognosis.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28018598      PMCID: PMC5159997          DOI: 10.1186/s40364-016-0080-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomark Res        ISSN: 2050-7771


Background

Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is the most common hematological malignancy in childhood and accounts for about 20% of acute leukemia in adults [1-3]. On the basis of ontogenic classification, ALL is divided into T-lineage ALL and B-lineage ALL. B-lineage ALL is characterized by the expression of the B-cell markers CD19, CD22 and CD79a [4]. These cells lack expression of CD3 and of myeloperoxidase. Leukemic cells express various markers of differentiation that allow the distinction of at least three main subtypes: Early precursor B-ALL (pro-B-ALL, CD10−, CD19+, cCD79a+, cCD22+, TdT+), Common B-ALL (CD10+) and Precursor B-ALL (pre-B-ALL, cytoplasmic μ+, sIg−, CD10+/−) [5]. Clonal rearrangement analysis of immunoglobulin genes and TCR has demonstrated the single-cell origin of ALL. Leukemogenesis is a multistep process that requires the accumulation of alterations in a hematopoietic progenitor cell at multiple stages. The leukemic stem cell (LSC) hypothesis postulates that leukemia are hierarchically organized and leukemic stem cells have the capacity to self-renew, give rise to more differentiated progeny and maintain the leukemia long-term [6-8]. CD34+CD38− cells have been shown to be able to initiate acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [9]. Similarly, previous studies have reported that in B-ALL, only CD34+CD38− cells can initiate leukemia in immunodeficient recipients [10]. Recently, studies have revealed that the frequency of leukemia-initiating cells (LICs) is high and consistent between different stages of immunophenotypic maturation in B-ALL [11, 12]. Therefore, CD34 or CD38 may serve as potential biomarkers of LSCs in B-ALL cells.

CD34 and CD38

CD34 is a cluster-of-differentiation molecule first described by Civin et al. in a cell surface glycoprotein [13] and is encoded by the CD34 gene [14]. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. The isoform a (b) gene has 2612 (2816) bases, localized on chromosome 1q32. CD34 isoform a (b) protein has 385 (328) amino acid residues. The CD34 protein plays a role in the attachment of stem cells to the bone marrow extracellular matrix or to stromal cells [15, 16]. CD34 is a transmembrane protein that was first identified on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. CD34 is one of the most widely used markers of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and is involved in the inhibition of HSC differentiation, HSC expansion, signaling transduction and anti-adhesion [15]. CD38 is a type II glycoprotein that was originally described as a lymphoid cell surface differentiation marker [17]. The CD38 gene has 5694 bases, maps to chromosome 4p15 and shares a long evolutionary history with CD157. The CD38 protein has 300 amino acid residues. CD38 is also a multifunctional ectoenzyme that catalyzes the synthesis and hydrolysis of cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR) from NAD+ to ADP-ribose. These reaction products are essential for the regulation of intracellular Ca2+. CD38 has been used as a prognostic marker in leukemia [18].

CD34 and CD38 as biomarkers for LICs

The CD34+/CD38− immunophenotype is used to identify HSCs and LICs in AML [19, 20]. There is an ongoing debate over the existence of LICs in human B-ALL. In 2000, Cobaleda et al. transplanted Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL cells into non-obese diabetic/severe combined (NOD/SCID) mice and found that only the CD34+CD38− fraction could give rise to ALL [10]; the CD34+CD38+ and CD34− fractions contained no cells with this capability. By adding cytokines, Blair and colleagues successfully educated B-ALL cells in serum-free cell culture. They fractionated the B-ALL cells on the basis of cell-surface-marker expression and demonstrated that the ALL cells with long-term proliferative and replating potential were CD34+CD10CD19− [21]. Using the newborn NOD/SCID/IL2Rg (null) xenotransplantation model, Ishikawa et al. demonstrated that CD38 expression was irrelevant in identifying a leukemogenic population in human primary B-ALL. By intravenously injecting purified CD34+CD38+CD19+ or CD34+CD38CD19+ cells from B-precursor ALL patients, they successfully demonstrated the leukemia-initiating capacity of both cell types [22]. All of these studies reached the unanimous verdict that it was the expression of CD34 that highlighted the LIC population, similar to the case of AML. However, Vormoor et al. and our studies established that blast cells from different stages of acute lymphoblastic leukemia were all able to reconstitute the complete leukemia phenotype in vivo, no matter in which subpopulations they were involved (CD34, CD38, CD20 or CD19, either positive or negative) [11, 23]. These conflicting results indicate that key questions regarding the markers of LSCs in ALL remain unresolved.

CD34 and CD38 as biomarkers for prognosis in B-ALL

CD34+CD38− B-ALL cells have been used not only in studies of LSCs, but also in diagnosis and prognosis (Table 1). In a large cohort of 2028 children with ALL, the treatment outcomes of a subset of B-lineage ALL patients with CD10+CD19+CD34+ immature B-progenitor leukemia were compared with the treatment outcomes of the remaining CD19+ B-lineage ALL patients. It was found that the CD10+CD19+CD34+ immature B-progenitor patients were associated with a more favorable prognosis [24]. In a recent study of 112 cases of childhood ALL, high proportions of CD34+CD38− cells were positively correlated with high-risk subgroups and negatively correlated with outcomes [25]. A study of 63 cases of ALL found that CD34 protein expression was higher in pediatric B-ALL than in T-ALL [26]. In another study, 75 newly diagnosed adult ALL patients were analyzed for CD34 expression. Expression of this protein was positively associated with B-cell-lineage ALL. CD34 was more expressed in poor-risk B-ALL patients and associated with features of poor prognosis [27]. Hence, the CD34 expression pattern may have a prognostic utility in B-ALL.
Table 1

Summary of the CD34 or CD38 related cell subsets corresponding with B-ALL prognosis

Cell SubsetPrognosisReference
CD34 +positive/negativeCD34 expression is favorable and significant prognosis in childhood B-lineage ALL (age 1 to 10 years). [26]CD34 mostly expressed in poor risk adult B-ALLs patients, characterized with higher WBC cell count, and higher percentage of peripheral blood leukemic cells [27]
CD38 +positivePh + ALL showed lower CD38 expression than Ph- groups. Overall survival favored ALL patients with higher CD38 levels [26]
CD34 + CD38− cellsnegativeA high proportion of CD34+/CD38- cells is associated with clinical and biological features and a poor prognosis of childhood ALL. [25]
CD10 + CD19 + CD34+positiveWith CD10 + CD19’CD34+ immature B-progenitor subset, pediatric B-lineage ALL patients may have favorable characteristics to achieve favorable EFS outcomes. [24]
Summary of the CD34 or CD38 related cell subsets corresponding with B-ALL prognosis In contrast to CD34 expression, increased CD38 expression in acute leukemia (AML or ALL) is associated with favorable prognosis [18]. In a study of 304 AML and 138 ALL patients, Ph+ ALL patients showed lower CD38 expression compared with other cytogenetic groups [28]. CD38 expression was found to be positively related to overall survival rates among AML and ALL patients. Therefore, these studies suggest that higher expression of CD34 and CD38 may represent prognostic biomarkers of poor and favorable outcomes for B-ALL, respectively.

Conclusion

The CD34 and CD38 patterns in B-ALL cannot be used as specific surface markers to distinguish LSCs from blast cells. CD34 and CD38 expression are detected in most cases of B-ALL and can serve as specific biomarkers for prognosis. Lack of CD34 or high CD38 expression is associated with favorable prognosis.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Leukaemia stem cells and the evolution of cancer-stem-cell research.

Authors:  Brian J P Huntly; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Cancer stem cells--perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Michael F Clarke; John E Dick; Peter B Dirks; Connie J Eaves; Catriona H M Jamieson; D Leanne Jones; Jane Visvader; Irving L Weissman; Geoffrey M Wahl
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Novel functions of the CD34 family.

Authors:  Julie S Nielsen; Kelly M McNagny
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  High proportion of CD34+/CD38-cells is positively correlated with poor prognosis in newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Juan Long; Shan Liu; Kang Li; Xiaoyan Zhou; Penghui Zhang; Lin Zou
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-07-29

5.  Outcomes of adult patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia following frontline treatment with a pediatric regimen.

Authors:  Elena Liew; Eshetu G Atenafu; Aaron D Schimmer; Karen W L Yee; Andre C Schuh; Mark D Minden; Vikas Gupta; Joseph M Brandwein
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  Initiating and cancer-propagating cells in TEL-AML1-associated childhood leukemia.

Authors:  Dengli Hong; Rajeev Gupta; Philip Ancliff; Ann Atzberger; John Brown; Shamit Soneji; Joanne Green; Sue Colman; Wanda Piacibello; Veronica Buckle; Shinobu Tsuzuki; Mel Greaves; Tariq Enver
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Ching-Hon Pui; Leslie L Robison; A Thomas Look
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  CD34 expression is associated with major adverse prognostic factors in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  X Thomas; E Archimbaud; C Charrin; J P Magaud; D Fiere
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 9.  Cancer stem cells: impact, heterogeneity, and uncertainty.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Magee; Elena Piskounova; Sean J Morrison
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  Heterogeneity of CD34 and CD38 expression in acute B lymphoblastic leukemia cells is reversible and not hierarchically organized.

Authors:  Zhiwu Jiang; Manman Deng; Xinru Wei; Wei Ye; Yiren Xiao; Simiao Lin; Suna Wang; Baiheng Li; Xin Liu; Gong Zhang; Peilong Lai; Jianyu Weng; Donghai Wu; Haijia Chen; Wei Wei; Yuguo Ma; Yangqiu Li; Pentao Liu; Xin Du; Duanqing Pei; Yao Yao; Bing Xu; Peng Li
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 17.388

View more
  14 in total

1.  Genome-wide identification of microRNA signatures associated with stem/progenitor cells in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Ehsan Valiollahi; Josep Maria Ribera; Eulàlia Genescà; Javad Behravan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Leukemia stem cells promote chemoresistance by inducing downregulation of lumican in mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Zhen Yu; Lin Liu; Qiang Shu; Dong Li; Ran Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  [Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of pediatric pro-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

Authors:  Yu-Juan Xue; Ai-Dong Lu; Yu Wang; Yue-Ping Jia; Ying-Xi Zuo; Le-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12

4.  CD38 as a PET Imaging Target in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Emily B Ehlerding; Christopher G England; Dawei Jiang; Stephen A Graves; Lei Kang; Saige Lacognata; Todd E Barnhart; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  High mTOR expression independently prognosticates poor clinical outcome to induction chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Asheema Khanna; Bharat Bhushan; Pradeep Singh Chauhan; Sunita Saxena; Dipendra Kumar Gupta; Fouzia Siraj
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Domain retention in transcription factor fusion genes and its biological and clinical implications: a pan-cancer study.

Authors:  Pora Kim; Leomar Y Ballester; Zhongming Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-24

7.  Clinical-biological characteristics and treatment outcomes of pediatric pro-B ALL patients enrolled in BCH-2003 and CCLG-2008 protocol: a study of 121 Chinese children.

Authors:  Chao Gao; Shu-Guang Liu; Zhi-Xia Yue; Yi Liu; Jing Liang; Jun Li; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Jiao-Le Yu; Ying Wu; Wei Lin; Hu-Yong Zheng; Rui-Dong Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.722

8.  Cytotoxic and Apoptotic Effects of Luffa Cylindrica Leaves Extract against Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Shimaa Yehia; Ibrahim M Abdel-Salam; Basma M Elgamal; Basma El-Agamy; Germine M Hamdy; Hala M Aldouski
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 9.  Current understanding of epigenetics mechanism as a novel target in reducing cancer stem cells resistance.

Authors:  Saeedeh Keyvani-Ghamsari; Khatereh Khorsandi; Azhar Rasul; Muhammad Khatir Zaman
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.551

10.  CD38 Is Robustly Induced in Human Macrophages and Monocytes in Inflammatory Conditions.

Authors:  Stephanie A Amici; Nicholas A Young; Janiret Narvaez-Miranda; Kyle A Jablonski; Jesus Arcos; Lucia Rosas; Tracey L Papenfuss; Jordi B Torrelles; Wael N Jarjour; Mireia Guerau-de-Arellano
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.