| Literature DB >> 28018587 |
Amal E Mohammed1, Eman G Behiry1, Akram E El-Sadek2, Waleed E Abdulghany2, Dalia M Mahmoud1, Abdelfattah A Elkholy2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the association of neonatal indirect hyperbilirubinemia in exclusively breast-fed infants with UGT1A1 (Uridine Diphosphate-Glucuronyl transferase 1A1) polymorphism.Entities:
Keywords: Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia; UGT1A1 polymorphism
Year: 2016 PMID: 28018587 PMCID: PMC5173312 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.11.046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Thermal conditions of PCR.
| Parameter | Polymerase activation | PCR (40 cycles) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denature | Anneal/extend | ||
| Temperature (°C) | 95 °C | 95 °C | 60 °C |
| Time (mm:ss) | 02:00 | 00:15 | 01:00 |
Demographic characteristics of the studied groups and patients subgroups.
| Variable | Patients | Controls | t | P | Subgroup I A (N = 22) | Subgroup I B (N = 8) | t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (wk) | 39.1 ± 0.64 | 39.2 ± 0.82 | 0.11 | 0.91 (NS) | 39.1 ± 0.61 | 39.2 ± 0.75 | 0.41 | 0.68 (NS) | |
| Age (days) | 3.1 ± 1.4 | 3.0 ± 1.5 | 0.52 | 0.60 (NS) | 3.2 ± 1.5 | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 0.05* | 0.96 (NS) | |
| No.(%) | No.(%) | X2 | P | FET | P | ||||
| Sex | Male | 20 (66.7%) | 11 (55.0%) | 0.69 | 0.41 (NS) | 15 (68.2%) | 5 (62.5%) | – | 1.0 (NS) |
| Female | 10 (33.3%) | 9 (45.0%) | 7 (31.8%) | 3 (37.5%) | |||||
| Mode of delivery | NVD | 16 (53.3%) | 12 (60.0%) | 0.22 | 0.64 (NS) | ||||
| C.S | 14 (46.7%) | 8 (40.0%) | |||||||
| Birth weight (gm) | 3251.6 ± 184.9 | 3179.5 ± 290.5 | 1.08 | 0.28 (NS) | 3267.7 ± 202.5 | 3207.5 ± 125.2 | 0.71 | 0.48 (NS) | |
| Weight at sample collection (gm) | 2971.4 ± 175.7 | 3197.5 ± 284.4 | 3.48 | 0.001 (HS) | 3021.4 ± 173.7 | 2833.7 ± 88.97 | 3.03 | 0.002 (S) | |
| Weight loss (%) | 7.46 ± 1.18 | 11.60 ± 0.81 | 4.13 | <0.001 (HS) | |||||
| T. bilirubin (mg/dl) Mean ± SD | 17.6 ± 4.33 | 21.1 ± 1.21 | MWU test = 2.18 | 0.029 (S) | |||||
| Indirect. bilirubin (mg/dl) Mean ± SD | 14.1 ± 3.98 | 17.9 ± 3.32 | 2.14 | 0.032 (S) | |||||
NVD: Normal vaginal delivery, C.S: Caserean section.
NS: Non significant, X2 = Chisquare, SD = standard deviation, t = student-t-test, P > 0.05 = non-significant, P < 0.001 = very highly significant.
Comparison of the studied groups regarding genotype& allele frequency.
| Groups | Total | FET & P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | Controls | |||||
| Genotype | G/G | Count | 19 | 19 | 38 | 6.65 & 0.025 (S) |
| % within groups | 63.3% | 95.0% | 76.0% | |||
| G/A | Count | 10 | 1 | 11 | ||
| % within groups | 33.3% | 5.0% | 22.0% | |||
| A/A | Count | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| % within groups | 3.3% | 0.0% | 2.0% | |||
| Allele | G | Count | 48 | 39 | 87 | OR |
| % within Groups | 80.0% | 97.5% | 87.0% | |||
| A | Count | 12 | 1 | 13 | ||
| % within Groups | 20.0% | 2.5% | 13.0% | |||
FET: fisher exact test, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.
Fig. 1Example of the allelic discrimination of the UGT1A1*28 variant by TaqMan PCR.
Comparison of the weight of the studied patients according to genotype.
| Group | n. | Mean ± SD | Range | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth weight (gm) | |||||
| G/G | 19 | 3272.1 ± 206.30 | 2980–3950 | 0.79 | 0.43 (NS) |
| G/A- A/A | 11 | 3216.3 ± 142.98 | 3050–3400 | ||
| Weight at sample collection (gm) | |||||
| G/G | 19 | 3028.0 ± 180.88 | 2730–3600 | 2.52 | 0.018 (S) |
| G/A- A/A | 11 | 2873.6 ± 118.59 | 2740–3100 | ||
| Weight loss (%) | |||||
| G/G | 19 | 7.4 ± 1.35 | 5.4–10.5 | 5.59 | <0.001 (HS) |
| G/A- A/A | 11 | 10.6 ± 1.74 | 7.7–12.6 | ||
| T. bilirubin (mg/dl) Mean ± SD | |||||
| G/G | 19 | 17.2 ± 4.5 | (9.1–19.8) | 2.25 | 0.03 (S) |
| G/A- A/A | 11 | 20.7 ± 1.136 | (19–22) | ||
Man Whitney U (MWU) test was used.
Comparison between patient subgroups regarding genotype & allele frequency.
| Subgroups | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | |||
| Genotype | G/G Count | 18 | 1 | P < 0.001 (HS) |
| G/A Count | 3 | 7 | ||
| A/A Count | 1 (4.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Group A | Group B | OR | ||
| Allele | G Count | 39 | 9 | 6.07 |
| A Count | 5 | 7 | P = 0.01 (S) | |
Comparison between control subgroups regarding genotype frequency.
| Control group II | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wtloss<10% | Wtloss>10% | ||||
| Genotype | G/G | Count | 11 | 8 | 19 |
| % within wtloss | 91.7% | 100.0% | 95.0% | ||
| G/A- A/A | Count | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| % within wtloss | 8.3% | 0.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Total | Count | 12 | 8 | 20 | |
| % within wtloss | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
P = 1.0 (NS).
Binary logistic regression analysis for predictors of hyperbilirubinemia.
| Variable | Β | Adjusted OR | 95%CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body wt loss | 2.39 | 6.31 | 2.2–19.8 | 0.001 (HS) |
| Genotype (G/A) | 2.04 | 5.82 | 1.29–23.5 | 0.02 (S) |
| Allele (A) | 3.63 | 8.3 | 2.1–20.9 | 0.001 (HS) |