| Literature DB >> 28018320 |
Patrícia Martins Simões1, Hajar Lemriss2, Yann Dumont3, Sanâa Lemriss4, Jean-Philippe Rasigade5, Sophie Assant-Trouillet6, Azeddine Ibrahimi2, Saâd El Kabbaj4, Marine Butin7, Frédéric Laurent1.
Abstract
The multi-resistant Staphylococcus capitis clone NRCS-A has recently been described as a major pathogen causing nosocomial, late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm neonates worldwide. NRCS-A representatives exhibit an atypical antibiotic resistance profile. Here, the complete closed genome (chromosomal and plasmid sequences) of NRCS-A prototype strain CR01 and the draft genomes of three other clinical NRCS-A strains from Australia, Belgium and the United Kingdom are annotated and compared to available non-NRCS-A S. capitis genomes. Our goal was to delineate the uniqueness of the NRCS-A clone with respect to antibiotic resistance, virulence factors and mobile genetic elements. We identified 6 antimicrobial resistance genes, all carried by mobile genetic elements. Previously described virulence genes present in the NRCS-A genomes are shared with the six non-NRCS-A S. capitis genomes. Overall, 63 genes are specific to the NRCS-A lineage, including 28 genes located in the methicillin-resistance cassette SCCmec. Among the 35 remaining genes, 25 are of unknown function, and 9 correspond to an additional type I restriction modification system (n = 3), a cytosine methylation operon (n = 2), and a cluster of genes related to the biosynthesis of teichoic acids (n = 4). Interestingly, a tenth gene corresponds to a resistance determinant for nisin (nsr gene), a bacteriocin secreted by potential NRCS-A strain niche competitors in the gut microbiota. The genomic characteristics presented here emphasize the contribution of mobile genetic elements to the emergence of multidrug resistance in the S. capitis NRCS-A clone. No NRCS-A-specific known virulence determinant was detected, which does not support a role for virulence as a driving force of NRCS-A emergence in NICUs worldwide. However, the presence of a nisin resistance determinant on the NRCS-A chromosome, but not in other S. capitis strains and most coagulase-negative representatives, might confer a competitive advantage to NRCS-A strains during the early steps of gut colonization in neonates. This suggests that the striking adaptation of NRCS-A to the NICU environment might be related to its specific antimicrobial resistance and also to a possible enhanced ability to challenge competing bacteria in its ecological niche.Entities:
Keywords: SMRT; Staphylococcus capitis; bacteremia; comparative genomics; late-onset sepsis; multiple drug resistance; nisin
Year: 2016 PMID: 28018320 PMCID: PMC5157051 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01991
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Bacterial strains used in the nisin susceptibility test.
| SC | yes | CR01 | NICU | FR | + |
| SC | yes | CR03 | NICU | BE | + |
| SC | yes | CR04 | NICU | AUS | + |
| SC | yes | CR05 | NICU | UK | + |
| SC | yes | CR07 | NICU | FR | + |
| SC | yes | BC69 | NICU | South K | + |
| SC | yes | AQ62 | NICU | NO | + |
| SC | yes | AW77 | NICU | NZ | + |
| SC | yes | BI76 | NICU | USA | + |
| SC | no | AB51 | ICU | AUS | − |
| SC | no | CR02 | ICU | FR | − |
| SC | no | AR22 | ICU | DK | − |
| SC | no | AY18 | ICU | GR | − |
| SC | no | AZ72 | ICU | Sing | − |
| SC | no | BA24 | ICU | USA | − |
SC, Staphylococcus capitis; FR, France; BE, Belgium; UK, United Kingdom; AUS, Australia; South K, South Korea; NO, Norway; NZ, New Zealand; USA, United States of America; DK, Denmark; GR, Greece; Sing, Singapore; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; ICU, intensive care unit (adults).
General genomic features of .
| GC% content | 33.02 | 32.81 | 32.80 | 32.84 |
| Nb of phages | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Nb of plasmids | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Nb and type of insertion sequence | IS256: 10 + 0 | IS256: 1 | IS256: 1 | IS256: 1 |
Putative plasmid, no definitive data about circularization.
Insertion sequence isolated in a small contig, indicating probable multiple insertions in the complete genome.
Comparison of virulence factors in .
| Adherence | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| Exozymes | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| Host immune invasion | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Toxins | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| Proteases | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| Phenol-soluble modulins | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Esterases | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| HTH transcription factors | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
The presence of virulence genes is indicated by the “+” sign.
Genomic profiles of antibiotic resistance for clone NRCS-A strains from four different countries.
| Penicillin | + | + | + | − | Plasmid | |
| Methicillin | + | + | + | + | Chromosome | |
| Tetracycline | − | − | + | − | Plasmid* | |
| Aminoglycosides | + | + | + | + | Chromosome | |
| Macrolide, Lincosamide and Streptogramin B | − | − | + | − | Plasmid* | |
| Fusidic acid | − | − | − | + | Phage (chromosome)* | |
All antibiotic resistance genes were found in MGEs. Putative regions in the draft genomes are indicated by an .
Figure 1Comparison of the genetic content of the strain CR01 plasmid with the draft genomes of the other three NRCS-A strains. Open reading frames (ORFs) are shown as arrows indicating the direction of transcription. Homologous gene clusters are indicated by a light gray shadow connecting ORFs present in distinct plasmid sequences. Light gray arrows represent unknown proteins, unless specified otherwise. Arrows with dotted lines represent partial or truncated ORFs. Antibiotic resistance genes are colored with a gray gradient; genes associated with resistance to heavy metals are colored in dark gray. Abbreviations: tnp, transposase; copZ, copper insertion chaperone and transporter component; copA, copper transporter ATPase; csoR, copper-sensing transcriptional repressor; czcD, potassium/proton-divalent cation antiporter; rep, replication-associated family protein; repA, replication-associated protein RepA; blaZ, beta-lactamase resistance gene; blaR, regulatory protein BlaR1; blaI, penicillinase repressor; mntH, divalent metal cation transporter MntH, tetK, tetracycline resistance gene.
Figure 2Comparison of the genetic content of the strain CR01 intact prophage present in the other three draft genomes of NRCS-A strains. Prophage prediction was performed using PHAST software; cR01's prophage is divided into three regions according to the degree of conservation compared to the other strains. The mean percent of aa identity in each region is indicated, and a gray gradient is also used to represent the percent similarity.