Literature DB >> 28017975

The Role of Surgeons' Colposcopic Experience in Obtaining Adequate Samples by Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone in Women of Reproductive Age.

R Sparić1, A Tinelli2, M Guido3, R Stefanović4, I Babović1, V Kesić1.   

Abstract

Introduction: There is insufficient reporting on the level of colposcopic training for the safe use of large loop excision of the transformation zone. The aim of this study was to perform a quality assessment of large loop excision of the transformation zone in women of reproductive age by evaluating the surgeons' colposcopic experience. Materials and
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on diagnostic or therapeutic large loop excision of the transformation zone. The following variables were analyzed: age, parity, indications for surgery, level of surgeon's colposcopic experience, definitive histological diagnosis, margin involvement, and the presence and type of artifacts interfering with the pathological interpretation. Patients were divided into three groups: group A - 75 patients treated by junior colposcopists; group B - 74 patients treated by experienced colposcopists, and group C - 117 patients treated by expert colposcopists.
Results: Regarding the presence and diagnostic significance of the artifacts the groups were significantly different. Inadequate samples were the least frequent in group C. Artifacts precluding histological diagnosis were the most common in group A. The margins were predominantly inconclusive in group A. Conclusions: A high rate of artifacts is a disadvantage of the large loop excision of the transformation zone performed by surgeons less skilled for colposcopy. Although large loop excision of the transformation zone is considered to be a minor surgery, skills in colposcopy are an essential prerequisite for optimal results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LLETZ; artifacts; colposcopic experience; conization; specimen

Year:  2016        PMID: 28017975      PMCID: PMC5177550          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-113773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  25 in total

1.  Proportion of cervical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; George Valasoulis; Sofia-Melina Stasinou; Christina Founta; Antonios Athanasiou; Phillip Bennett; Evangelos Paraskevadis
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).

Authors:  Nina Duesing; Joerg Schwarz; Matthias Choschzick; Fritz Jaenicke; Friederike Gieseking; Rana Issa; Sven Mahner; Linn Woelber
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Inpatient and outpatient loop electrosurgery excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  B Leimbacher; N Samartzis; P Imesch; K J Dedes; D Fink; C Canonica
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  A comparative study of two methods of large loop excision of the transformation zone.

Authors:  Mohamed A Mossa; Paul G Carter; Salah Abdu; Martin P A Young; Valerie A Thomas; Desmond P J Barton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Large-loop excision of the transformation zone: effect on the pathologic interpretation of resection margins.

Authors:  F J Montz; C H Holschneider; L D Thompson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papoutsis; Alexandros Rodolakis; Spiridon Mesogitis; Maria Sotiropoulou; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Number of fragments, margin status and thermal artifacts of conized specimens from LLETZ surgery to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Dulcimary Dias Bittencourt; Rita Maira Zanine; Ana Martins Sebastião; Nabiha Saadi Taha; Neila Góis Speck; Julisa Chamorro Lascasas Ribalta
Journal:  Sao Paulo Med J       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.044

8.  LLETZ Specimen Fragmentation: Impact on Diagnosis, Outcome, and Implications for Training.

Authors:  Rasiah Bharathan; Balvinder Sagoo; Aravind Subramaniam; Peter Larsen-Disney; Andrew Fish
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-03-26

9.  Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ): a pathologic evaluation.

Authors:  M J Messing; L Otken; L A King; D G Gallup
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Does the number of tissue fragments removed from the cervix with excisional treatment for CIN pathology affect the completeness of excision and cytology recurrence at follow-up? An observational cohort study.

Authors:  D Papoutsis; J Panikkar; A Gornall; S Blundell
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluating a novel 3D printed model for simulating Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ).

Authors:  Matthias Kiesel; Inga Beyers; Adam Kalisz; Achim Wöckel; Sanja Löb; Tanja Schlaiss; Christine Wulff; Joachim Diessner
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  Introducing a novel model for simulating large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) using 3D printing technique.

Authors:  Matthias Kiesel; Inga Beyers; Adam Kalisz; Achim Wöckel; Saskia-Laureen Herbert; Carolin Curtaz; Joachim Diessner; Ralf Joukhadar; Christine Wulff
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  TWENTY-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH LARGE LOOP EXCISION OF THE TRANSFORMATION ZONE AT SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTRE.

Authors:  Dražan Butorac; Bernarda Škrtić; Marijo Čukelj; Krunoslav Kuna; Ivka Djaković
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.780

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.