Literature DB >> 28017845

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Significantly Reduces Body Mass Index and Metabolic Complications in Obese Patients.

Reem Z Sharaiha1, Nikhil A Kumta2, Monica Saumoy2, Amit P Desai2, Alex M Sarkisian2, Andrea Benevenuto2, Amy Tyberg2, Rekha Kumar3, Leon Igel3, Elizabeth C Verna4, Robert Schwartz2, Christina Frissora2, Alpana Shukla3, Louis J Aronne3, Michel Kahaleh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an incisionless, minimally invasive bariatric procedure that reduces the length and width of the gastric cavity to facilitate weight loss. We performed a prospective study to evaluate the effects of ESG on total body weight loss and obesity-related comorbidities.
METHODS: We collected data from 91 consecutive patients (mean age, 43.86 ± 11.26 years; 68% female) undergoing ESG from August 2013 through March 2016. All patients had a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 and had failed noninvasive weight-loss measures or had a BMI greater than 40 kg/m2 and were not considered as surgical candidates or refused surgery. All procedures were performed with a cap-based flexible endoscopic suturing system to facilitate a triangular pattern of sutures to imbricate the greater curvature of the stomach. Patients were evaluated after 6 months (n = 73), 12 months (n = 53), and 24 months (n = 12) for anthropometric features (BMI, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure) and underwent serologic (hemoglobin A1c), lipid panel, serum triglycerides, and liver function tests. The primary outcomes were total body weight loss at 6, 12, and 24 months. Secondary outcomes were the effects of ESG on metabolic factors (blood pressure, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, steatohepatitis) and safety.
RESULTS: The patients' mean BMI before the procedure was 40.7 ± 7.0 kg/m2. Patients had lost 14.4% of their total body weight at 6 months (80% follow-up rate), 17.6% at 12 months (76% follow-up rate), and 20.9% at 24 months (66% follow-up rate) after ESG. At 12 months after ESG, patients had statistically significant reductions in levels of hemoglobin A1c (P = .01), systolic blood pressure (P = .02), waist circumference (P < .001), alanine aminotransferase (P < .001), and serum triglycerides (P = .02). However, there was no significant change in low-density lipoprotein after vs before ESG (P = .79). There was one serious adverse event (1.1%) (perigastric leak) that occurred that was managed non-operatively.
CONCLUSIONS: ESG is a minimally invasive and effective endoscopic weight loss intervention. In addition to sustained total body weight loss up to 24 months, ESG reduced markers of hypertension, diabetes, and hypertriglyceridemia.
Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALT; Bariatric Surgery; Metabolic Disorder; Stomach

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28017845     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  45 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies: Intragastric Balloons, Tissue Apposition, and Aspiration Therapy.

Authors:  Joshua A Turkeltaub; Steven A Edmundowicz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

Review 2.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for obesity patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peiwen Li; Bin Ma; Shulei Gong; Xinyu Zhang; Wenya Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscopic Gastric Plication for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Published Data over Time.

Authors:  Ben Gys; Philip Plaeke; Bas Lamme; Thierry Lafullarde; Niels Komen; Anthony Beunis; Guy Hubens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Bariatric surgery to achieve transplant in end-stage organ disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Babak J Orandi; Joshua W Purvis; Robert M Cannon; A Blair Smith; Cora E Lewis; Norah A Terrault; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Obesity Management.

Authors:  Reem Sharaiha
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2019-07

6.  Standardization of Bariatric Metabolic Procedures: World Consensus Meeting Statement.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; M A L Fobi; Jane N Buchwald
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Efficacy of Endoscopic Interventions for the Management of Obesity: a Meta-analysis to Compare Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty, AspireAssist, and Primary Obesity Surgery Endolumenal.

Authors:  Zubair Khan; Muhammad Ali Khan; Kaveh Hajifathalian; Shawn Shah; Mohamed Abdul; Monica Saumoy; Louis Aronne; Wade Lee; Reem Z Sharaiha
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Step-by-step approach to endoscopic gastroplasty by a novel single-channel endoscopic suturing system.

Authors:  Gontrand Lopez-Nava; Ravishankar Asokkumar
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2019-08-08

Review 9.  Endobariatrics and Metabolic Endoscopy: Can We Solve the Obesity Epidemic with Our Scope?

Authors:  Jad Farha; Shahem Abbarh; Zadid Haq; Mohamad I Itani; Andreas Oberbach; Vivek Kumbhari; Dilhana Badurdeen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-11-17

10.  Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty, Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Laparoscopic Band for Weight Loss: How Do They Compare?

Authors:  Aleksey A Novikov; Cheguevara Afaneh; Monica Saumoy; Viviana Parra; Alpana Shukla; Gregory F Dakin; Alfons Pomp; Enad Dawod; Shawn Shah; Louis J Aronne; Reem Z Sharaiha
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.