Juan Avendaño-Coy1, Julio Gómez-Soriano2, Carlos Goicoechea-García3, Julian Angel Basco-López2, Julian Taylor4. 1. Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Department of Nursing, Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Castilla-La Mancha University, Toledo, Spain. Electronic address: juan.avendano@uclm.es. 2. Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Department of Nursing, Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Castilla-La Mancha University, Toledo, Spain. 3. Department of Basic Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain. 4. Sensorimotor Function Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, Toledo, Spain; Stoke Mandeville Spinal Research, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Aylesbury, United Kingdom; Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of unmodulated 5-kHz alternating current on mechanical pain threshold (MPT), heat pain threshold (HPT), tactile threshold (TT), and peripheral nerve conduction (PNC) compared with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and sham stimulation. SETTING: National referral center. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy volunteers (N=38). No dropouts or adverse events were reported. INTERVENTION: TENS, unmodulated 5-kHz currents, and sham stimulation were applied on the radial nerve for 20 minutes with a 24-hour washout period between them and concealed intervention allocation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Four measures were taken: before, during, and 2 after the interventions. Algometry was used to assess MPT, a Peltier thermode for HPT using the method of limits, Von Frey filaments for TT, and radial nerve compound action potential. RESULTS: No differences were observed on MPT, HPT, and PNC when 5-kHz current and TENS were compared. However, TT increased 56.2mN (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.8-83.6) in the TENS group compared with the 5-kHz current group during intervention. Compared with sham stimulation during intervention, MPT increased 4.7N (95% CI, 0.3-9.2) using 5-kHz current and 10.4N (95% CI, 3.5-17.3) with TENS. TT increased 17.2mN (95% CI, 4.7-29.7) with 5-kHz current and 73.4mN (95% CI, 47.5-99.2) with TENS. However, HPT increased 1.0°C (95% CI, 0.2-2.0) only with TENS. For the PNC, no differences were found among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS:Unmodulated 5-kHz current produced an increase in somatosensory thresholds that was greater than placebo but not when compared with TENS; however, participants perceived 5-kHz currents to be more comfortable and showed more habituation to them.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of unmodulated 5-kHz alternating current on mechanical pain threshold (MPT), heat pain threshold (HPT), tactile threshold (TT), and peripheral nerve conduction (PNC) compared with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and sham stimulation. SETTING: National referral center. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy volunteers (N=38). No dropouts or adverse events were reported. INTERVENTION: TENS, unmodulated 5-kHz currents, and sham stimulation were applied on the radial nerve for 20 minutes with a 24-hour washout period between them and concealed intervention allocation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Four measures were taken: before, during, and 2 after the interventions. Algometry was used to assess MPT, a Peltier thermode for HPT using the method of limits, Von Frey filaments for TT, and radial nerve compound action potential. RESULTS: No differences were observed on MPT, HPT, and PNC when 5-kHz current and TENS were compared. However, TT increased 56.2mN (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.8-83.6) in the TENS group compared with the 5-kHz current group during intervention. Compared with sham stimulation during intervention, MPT increased 4.7N (95% CI, 0.3-9.2) using 5-kHz current and 10.4N (95% CI, 3.5-17.3) with TENS. TT increased 17.2mN (95% CI, 4.7-29.7) with 5-kHz current and 73.4mN (95% CI, 47.5-99.2) with TENS. However, HPT increased 1.0°C (95% CI, 0.2-2.0) only with TENS. For the PNC, no differences were found among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Unmodulated 5-kHz current produced an increase in somatosensory thresholds that was greater than placebo but not when compared with TENS; however, participants perceived 5-kHz currents to be more comfortable and showed more habituation to them.
Authors: David Martín-Caro Álvarez; Diego Serrano-Muñoz; Juan José Fernández-Pérez; Julio Gómez-Soriano; Juan Avendaño-Coy Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Diego Serrano-Muñoz; Julio Gómez-Soriano; Elisabeth Bravo-Esteban; María Vázquez-Fariñas; Julian Taylor; Juan Avendaño-Coy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 3.240