Literature DB >> 28017199

Effects of left DLPFC versus right PPC tDCS on multiple sclerosis fatigue.

Moussa A Chalah1, Naji Riachi2, Rechdi Ahdab3, Alaa Mhalla1, Mohamed Abdellaoui4, Alain Créange4, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur1, Samar S Ayache5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Fatigue is a frequent and debilitating symptom in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Its classical treatments are still faced with limited benefits and numerous side effects. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive brain stimulation technique, on such a challenging symptom. Our secondary outcomes included the assessment of tDCS impact on mood and attentional performance.
METHODS: Ten fatigued MS patients were enrolled in a double-blind, sham-controlled, and cross-over study. Each patient randomly received three anodal tDCS blocks: active stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), active stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC), and sham stimulation over either cortical site. Both cortical targets are key components in the MS fatigue networks. The blocks consisted of five consecutive daily sessions and were held apart by a washout interval of three weeks.
RESULTS: Only active left DLPFC stimulation significantly ameliorated fatigue. Mood improvement was exclusively obtained following active right PPC stimulation. Neither intervention had effects on attention.
CONCLUSION: Our study supports the role of anodal tDCS over the left prefrontal in treating MS fatigue. The lack of tDCS effects on attention might be related to the heterogeneity of the studied cohort, the relatively small sample size, the protocol design and duration. Modifying these variables and coupling tDCS with neuroimaging might improve the clinical outcomes and enhance our understanding of the tDCS mechanism of actions.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Fatigue; Mood; Multiple sclerosis; Posterior parietal cortex; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28017199     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  23 in total

1.  Electrophysiological and behavioral effects of frontal transcranial direct current stimulation on cognitive fatigue in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Marina Fiene; Katharina S Rufener; Maria Kuehne; Mike Matzke; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Tino Zaehle
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Results from a randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Authors:  Leigh E Charvet; Bryan Dobbs; Michael T Shaw; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Lauren B Krupp
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Effects on Motor Control of Personalized Neuromodulation Against Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue.

Authors:  Matteo Padalino; Carla Scardino; Giancarlo Zito; Andrea Cancelli; Carlo Cottone; Massimo Bertoli; Eugenia Gianni; Teresa L'Abbate; Elisabetta Trombetta; Camillo Porcaro; Fabiano Bini; Franco Marinozzi; Maria Maddalena Filippi; Franca Tecchio
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Balance and Gait in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Nicola Marotta; Alessandro de Sire; Cinzia Marinaro; Lucrezia Moggio; Maria Teresa Inzitari; Ilaria Russo; Anna Tasselli; Teresa Paolucci; Paola Valentino; Antonio Ammendolia
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Application of tRNS to improve multiple sclerosis fatigue: a pilot, single-blind, sham-controlled study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Salemi; Giulia Vazzoler; Paolo Ragonese; Alessia Bianchi; Giuseppe Cosentino; Giuseppe Croce; Massimo Gangitano; Erika Portera; Sabrina Realmuto; Brigida Fierro; Filippo Brighina
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Remodeling Functional Connectivity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Challenging Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Mario Stampanoni Bassi; Luana Gilio; Fabio Buttari; Pierpaolo Maffei; Girolama A Marfia; Domenico A Restivo; Diego Centonze; Ennio Iezzi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Novel flexible cap for application of transcranial electrical stimulation: a usability study.

Authors:  Alexander Hunold; Daniela Ortega; Klaus Schellhorn; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 8.  The Potential Role of Neurophysiology in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue.

Authors:  Fioravante Capone; Francesco Motolese; Emma Falato; Mariagrazia Rossi; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Fatigue and Affective Manifestations in Multiple Sclerosis-A Cluster Approach.

Authors:  Samar S Ayache; Moussa A Chalah
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-22

Review 10.  Cognitive Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: An Objective Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Stefanie Linnhoff; Marina Fiene; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Tino Zaehle
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.