Effect of rotary electric toothbrush versus manual toothbrush on periodontal status during orthodontic treatment.

Adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances frequently have increased levels of plaque accumulation and gingivitis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a rotary electric toothbrush would be more effective than conventional toothbrushing in maintaining periodontal health in these patients. Forty adolescent patients were divided into equal groups matched for sex and age. Before and during placement of orthodontic appliances, one group was instructed in use of the rotary electric toothbrush and the other in the use of a conventional toothbrush; these instructions were reinforced at monthly visits thereafter. Baseline clinical assessments of Plaque Index, Gingival Index, and bleeding tendency were made on six standard teeth before appliances were placed. assessments were repeated at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after appliances were placed. Intragroup and intergroup differences were tested by a two-way analysis of variance. At baseline there were no significant differences between the two groups for any study variable. During the 18-month study period, however, plaque accumulation and gingivitis increased significantly over baseline levels in the control group (p less than 0.01) but remained stable in the group using the rotary electric toothbrush. In addition, the control group showed significantly greater plaque (p less than 0.01), gingival inflammation (p less than 0.001), and gingival bleeding on probing (p less than 0.001) than did the treatment group from the 1- to 18-month examinations. These data suggest that the rotary electric toothbrush is more effective than conventional toothbrushes for removing plaque and controlling gingivitis in adolescents during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes