Literature DB >> 2801526

Usefulness of the Doppler mean gradient in evaluation of children with aortic valve stenosis and comparison to gradient at catheterization.

A R Bengur1, A R Snider, G A Serwer, J Peters, A Rosenthal.   

Abstract

To assess the usefulness of the Doppler mean gradient as a noninvasive indicator of the need for intervention, 33 children (ages 3 months to 20 years) with valvular aortic stenosis (AS) underwent a 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examination a median of 1 day before cardiac catheterization. The clinical decision for intervention was based on finding a catheterization peak-to-peak pressure gradient of greater than 75 mm Hg or from 50 to 75 mm Hg in the presence of symptoms or an abnormal exercise treadmill test result. Of the 33 patients, 23 required intervention. The decision for intervention was compared to the Doppler mean gradient, and the Doppler peak and mean gradients were compared to the catheterization peak-to-peak gradient. All 12 patients with a Doppler mean gradient greater than 27 mm Hg had intervention and had a catheterization peak-to-peak gradient of greater than or equal to 75 mm Hg. All 3 patients with a Doppler mean gradient less than 17 mm Hg had no intervention and had a peak-to-peak gradient less than 50 mm Hg. The remaining 18 patients with Doppler mean gradients between 17 and 27 mm Hg comprised an intermediate group in whom the Doppler mean gradient alone did not predict the need for intervention. From a chi-square table, a Doppler mean gradient greater than 27 mm Hg predicted the need for intervention with 100% specificity (no false positives) and 52% sensitivity (11 false negatives).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2801526     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90760-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Echocardiographic follow-up of congenital aortic valvular stenosis.

Authors:  Ayse Guler Eroglu; Kadir Babaoglu; Leven Saltik; Funda Oztunç; Tevfik Demir; Gulay Ahunbay; Alper Guzeltas; Gürkan Cetin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Aortic stenosis: the spectrum of practice.

Authors:  O Khalid; D M Luxenberg; C Sable; O Benavidez; T Geva; B Hanna; R Abdulla
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Management strategy for very mild aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  P J Bartz; D J Driscoll; J F Keane; W M Gersony; C J Hayes; J I Brenner; W M O'Fallon; D R Pieroni; R R Wolfe; W H Weidman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  The quest for the unholy grail.

Authors:  T Kimball
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Natural history and surgical outcomes for isolated discrete subaortic stenosis in children.

Authors:  C V Rohlicek; S F del Pino; M Hosking; J Miro; J M Côté; J Finley
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Balloon aortic valvoplasty in paediatric patients: progressive aortic regurgitation is common.

Authors:  C Balmer; M Beghetti; M Fasnacht; B Friedli; U Arbenz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography in assessing aortic stenosis severity and predicting need for intervention in children.

Authors:  Antonios P Vlahos; Gerald R Marx; Doff McElhinney; Stephen Oneill; Ioannis Goudevenos; Steven D Colan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 1.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.