Literature DB >> 28013380

The impact of age on the postoperative response of the diastolic function and left ventricular mass regression after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.

Teruya Nakamura1, Koichi Toda1, Toru Kuratani1, Shigeru Miyagawa1, Yasushi Yoshikawa1, Satsuki Fukushima1, Shunsuke Saito1, Yoshiki Sawa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the impact of advanced age on left ventricular mass regression and the change in the diastolic function after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis.
METHODS: The present study included 129 patients who underwent either surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement and 1-year postoperative echocardiography. The patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings were compared between patients who were <80 years of age (group Y: n = 69) and those who were ≥80 years of age (group O: n = 60).
RESULTS: Preoperative echocardiography revealed that although the left ventricular mass was similar between the groups, the patients in group O had more severe diastolic dysfunction in comparison to those in group Y. Postoperatively, left ventricular mass regression was significantly greater (p = 0.02) and diastolic dysfunction was less prevalent in group Y (p = 0.02) in comparison to group O. The change in E/e' was significantly correlated with the left ventricular mass regression in group Y (p = 0.02), but not in Group O (p = 0.21).
CONCLUSIONS: The patients in group O were less susceptible to improvements in myocardial remodeling and the diastolic function in comparison to those in group Y. The altered physiological response to aortic valve replacement might help to determine the appropriate timing of surgery in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Aortic valve stenosis; Hypertrophy, left ventricular; Myocardium

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28013380     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1458-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  31 in total

1.  Annular dynamics after mitral valve repair with different prosthetic rings: A real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nishi; Koichi Toda; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Masashi Kawamura; Daisuke Yoshioka; Tetsuya Saito; Takayoshi Ueno; Toru Kuratani; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Arturo Evangelista; Brian P Griffin; Bernard Iung; Catherine M Otto; Patricia A Pellikka; Miguel Quiñones
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function after valve replacement in aortic stenosis using exercise Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Jeong-Sook Seo; Min-Kyoung Jang; Eun-Young Lee; Sung-Cheol Yun; Dae-Hee Kim; Jong-Min Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 4.  Challenges in the management of severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Andrew Owen; Michael Y Henein
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement.

Authors:  Susheel K Kodali; Mathew R Williams; Craig R Smith; Lars G Svensson; John G Webb; Raj R Makkar; Gregory P Fontana; Todd M Dewey; Vinod H Thourani; Augusto D Pichard; Michael Fischbein; Wilson Y Szeto; Scott Lim; Kevin L Greason; Paul S Teirstein; S Chris Malaisrie; Pamela S Douglas; Rebecca T Hahn; Brian Whisenant; Alan Zajarias; Duolao Wang; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Martin B Leon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical characteristics of elderly patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Masahiko Kato; Kazuhiro Yamamoto
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-09-23

7.  Aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Olaf Schulz; Debora Brala; Ricarda Bensch; Jochen Krämer; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Gunnar Berghoefer; Ingolf Schimke
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2012-09

8.  Early effects of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and aortic valve replacement on myocardial function and aortic valve hemodynamics: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gareth Crouch; Jayme Bennetts; Ajay Sinhal; Phillip J Tully; Darryl P Leong; Craig Bradbrook; Amy L Penhall; Carmine G De Pasquale; Adhiraj Chakrabarty; Robert A Baker; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Relevance of residual left ventricular hypertrophy after surgery for isolated aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Cristina Gavina; Inês Falcão-Pires; Paulo Pinho; Maria-Conceição Manso; Alexandra Gonçalves; Francisco Rocha-Gonçalves; Adelino Leite-Moreira
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve.

Authors:  Willem Flameng; Bart Meuris; Paul Herijgers; Marie-Christine Herregods
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hospital cost savings and other advantages of sutureless vs stented aortic valves for intermediate-risk elderly patients.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Minami; Sarah Sainte; Herbert De Praetere; Filip Rega; Willem Flameng; Peter Verbrugghe; Bart Meuris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.549

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.