Literature DB >> 28013332

Early experience with dual mobility acetabular systems featuring highly cross-linked polyethylene liners for primary hip arthroplasty in patients under fifty five years of age: an international multi-centre preliminary study.

Jean-Alain Epinette1, Steven F Harwin2, Fiachra E Rowan3, Philippe Tracol4, Michael A Mont5, Morad Chughtai5, Geoffrey H Westrich3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate early performance of contemporary dual mobility acetabular systems with second generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene for primary hip arthroplasty of patients under 55 years of age.
METHODS: A prospective observational five years study across five centers in Europe and the USA of 321 patients with a mean age of 48.1 years was performed. Patients were assessed for causes of revision, hip instability, intra-prosthetic dissociation, Harris hip score and radiological signs of osteolysis.
RESULTS: There were no dislocations and no intra-prosthetic dissociations. Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated 97.51% survivorship for all cause revision and 99.68% survivorship for acetabular component revision at five years. Mean Harris hip score was 93.6. Two acetabular shells were revised for neck-rim implant impingement without dislocation and ten femoral stems were revised for causes unrelated to dual mobility implants.
CONCLUSION: Contemporary highly cross-linked polyethylene dual mobility systems demonstrate excellent early clinical, radiological, and survivorship results in a cohort of patients that demand high performance from their implants. It is envisaged that DM and second generation annealed HXLPE may reduce THA instability and wear, the two most common causes of THA revision in hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Annealed highly crosslinked polyethylene; Dual mobility; HXLPE; Instability; Observational study; Outcome; Primary hip arthroplasty; Wear; X3; Young patient

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28013332     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3367-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  33 in total

1.  Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up.

Authors:  R Philippot; F Farizon; J-P Camilleri; B Boyer; G Derhi; J Bonnan; M-H Fessy; F Lecuire
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2008-07-25

2.  Evora® chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: results at a minimum 10 years' follow-up.

Authors:  S Leclercq; J Y Benoit; J P de Rosa; E Tallier; C Leteurtre; P H Girardin
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.256

3.  Wear performance evaluation of a contemporary dual mobility hip bearing using multiple hip simulator testing conditions.

Authors:  Laquawn Loving; Reginald Kinfay Lee; Lizeth Herrera; Aaron Paul Essner; Jim Edward Nevelos
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  No differences found in bearing related hip survivorship at 10-12 years follow-up between patients with ceramic on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings compared to patients with ceramic on ceramic bearings.

Authors:  Jean-Alain Epinette; Michael T Manley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Crosslinked polyethylene compared to conventional polyethylene in total hip replacement: pre-clinical evaluation, in-vitro testing and prospective clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  Carel H Geerdink; Bernd Grimm; Rama Ramakrishnan; Jorco Rondhuis; Aart J Verburg; Alphons J Tonino
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Reasons for revision of first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Francisco J Medel; Daniel W MacDonald; Javad Parvizi; Matthew J Kraay; Clare M Rimnac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Lack of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty with a new dual mobility acetabular design.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Michele R D'Apuzzo; David C Markel; Arthur L Malkani; Stephen Raterman; Kipling P Sharpe; Charles N Cornell; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 8.  The changing demographics of total joint arthroplasty recipients in the United States and Ontario from 2001 to 2007.

Authors:  Bheeshma Ravi; Ruth Croxford; William M Reichmann; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz; Gillian A Hawker
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.098

9.  A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk.

Authors:  Jacques H Caton; Jean Louis Prudhon; André Ferreira; Thierry Aslanian; Régis Verdier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  13 in total

1.  Dual-mobility cup: a new French revolution.

Authors:  Jacques Henri Caton; André Ferreira
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Lack of early dislocation for dual mobility vs. fixed bearing total hip arthroplasty: A multi-center analysis of comparable cohorts.

Authors:  J A Dubin; G H Westrich
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-04

3.  Five-Year Follow-Up of Clinical Outcomes with an Anatomic Dual-Mobility Acetabular System: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jeremy Dubin; Ronald C Huang; Ahava Muskat; Kipling Sharpe; Art L Malkani; Michael Mont; Geoffrey Westrich
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-07-27

Review 4.  Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kwanchai Pituckanotai; Alisara Arirachakaran; Harit Tuchinda; Chinundorn Putananon; Nitiphol Nualsalee; Kittipong Setrkraising; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-08

5.  Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Associated with a Greater Incidence of Groin Pain in Comparison with Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing:A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Alexandra I Stavrakis; Amir Khoshbin; Amethia Joseph; Lily Y Lee; Mathias P Bostrom; Geoffrey H Westrich; Alexander S McLawhorn
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-08-04

6.  Severe Corrosion of Modular Dual Mobility Acetabular Components Identified During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mohammad S Abdelaal; Eric Zachwieja; Peter F Sharkey
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-03-03

7.  Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fu-Yuan Pai; Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Te-Feng Arthur Chou; Tsan-Wen Huang; Kuo-Chin Huang; Shang-Wen Tsai; Cheng-Fong Chen; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?

Authors:  Julien Wegrzyn; Matthieu Malatray; Vincent Pibarot; Gaetano Anania; Jacques Béjui-Hugues
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Iatrogenic intraprosthetic dislocation after closed reduction of dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: Report of two cases.

Authors:  Marco Rotini; Marco Cianforlini; Daniele Aucone; Emanuele Pacetti; Rocco Politano
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-14

10.  Recent update on crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean Langlois; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2020-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.