William Tillett1,2, Gavin Shaddick3, Amelia Jobling3, Ayman Askari4, Annie Cooper5, Paul Creamer6, Gavin Clunie7, Philip S Helliwell8, Jana James1, Lesley Kay9, Eleanor Korendowych1, Suzanne Lane10, Jonathon Packham11, Ragai Shaban5, Matthew L Thomas3, Lyn Williamson12, Neil McHugh1,2. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases. 2. Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 3. Department of Mathematics, University of Bath, Bath. 4. Department of Rheumatology, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital, Shropshire. 5. Department of Rheumatology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth. 6. Department of Rheumatology, North Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol. 7. Department of Rheumatology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge. 8. Department of Rheumatology, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds. 9. Department of Rheumatology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne. 10. Department of Rheumatology, Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich. 11. Department of Rheumatology, Haywood Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trentand. 12. Department of Rheumatology, Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the effect of medical treatment on work disability in patients with active PsA in a real-world setting. Methods: Four hundred patients with active PsA commencing or switching to anti-TNF or conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) were recruited to a multicentre UK prospective observational cohort study. Work disability was measured using the work productivity and activity-specific health problem instrument and peripheral joint activity was measured with the disease activity in PsA composite measure. Results: Four hundred patients were recruited, of whom 229 (57.25%) were working (of any age). Sixty-two patients of working age (24%) were unemployed. At 6 months there was a 10% improvement in presenteeism ( P = 0.007) and a 15% improvement in work productivity ( P = 0.001) among working patients commenced on csDMARDs ( n = 164) vs a larger and more rapid 30% improvement in presenteeism ( P < 0.001) and 40% improvement in work productivity ( P < 0.001) among those commenced on anti-TNF therapy ( n = 65). Clinical response was poor among patients commenced on a csDMARD ( n = 272), with an 8.4 point improvement in disease activity in PsA ( P < 0.001) vs those commenced on anti-TNF therapy ( n = 121), who had a 36.8 point improvement ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: We report significant and clinically meaningful improvements in both work disability and clinical outcomes after commencement of anti-TNF therapy in a real-world setting. Improvements in all outcomes among those commencing csDMARDs were slower and of a smaller magnitude.
Objectives: To determine the effect of medical treatment on work disability in patients with active PsA in a real-world setting. Methods: Four hundred patients with active PsA commencing or switching to anti-TNF or conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) were recruited to a multicentre UK prospective observational cohort study. Work disability was measured using the work productivity and activity-specific health problem instrument and peripheral joint activity was measured with the disease activity in PsA composite measure. Results: Four hundred patients were recruited, of whom 229 (57.25%) were working (of any age). Sixty-two patients of working age (24%) were unemployed. At 6 months there was a 10% improvement in presenteeism ( P = 0.007) and a 15% improvement in work productivity ( P = 0.001) among working patients commenced on csDMARDs ( n = 164) vs a larger and more rapid 30% improvement in presenteeism ( P < 0.001) and 40% improvement in work productivity ( P < 0.001) among those commenced on anti-TNF therapy ( n = 65). Clinical response was poor among patients commenced on a csDMARD ( n = 272), with an 8.4 point improvement in disease activity in PsA ( P < 0.001) vs those commenced on anti-TNF therapy ( n = 121), who had a 36.8 point improvement ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: We report significant and clinically meaningful improvements in both work disability and clinical outcomes after commencement of anti-TNF therapy in a real-world setting. Improvements in all outcomes among those commencing csDMARDs were slower and of a smaller magnitude.
Authors: Moa P Lee; Joyce Lii; Yinzhu Jin; Rishi J Desai; Daniel H Solomon; Joseph F Merola; Seoyoung C Kim Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Iain B McInnes; Proton Rahman; Dafna D Gladman; Steven Peterson; Prasheen Agarwal; Feifei Yang; Alexa P Kollmeier; Elizabeth C Hsia; Natalie J Shiff; Bei Zhou; Chenglong Han; May Shawi; William Tillett; Philip J Mease Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: Mary Lucy Marques; Alessia Alunno; Sofia Ramiro; Polina Putrik; Annelies Boonen; Marieke M Ter Wee; Louise Falzon Journal: RMD Open Date: 2021-02
Authors: Alexis Ogdie; Jessica A Walsh; Soumya D Chakravarty; Steven Peterson; Kim Hung Lo; Lilianne Kim; Nan Li; Elizabeth C Hsia; Eric K H Chan; Arthur Kavanaugh; M Elaine Husni Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 2.980