Literature DB >> 28012224

Continuation of low-molecular-weight heparin treatment for cancer-related venous thromboembolism: a prospective cohort study in daily clinical practice.

S J van der Wall1, F A Klok1, P L den Exter1, D Barrios2, R Morillo2, S C Cannegieter3, D Jimenez2, M V Huisman1.   

Abstract

Essentials Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) injections for venous thromboembolism (VTE) may be burdensome. Patients with active cancer and confirmed VTE were included to evaluate LMWH continuation. The cumulative incidence of discontinuation was 21% after a median period of 90 days. One out of five patients discontinued LMWH injections because of side effects.
SUMMARY: Background Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) monotherapy for 3-6 months as the first-line treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, although daily administration of LMWH injections over a course of several months may be burdensome, the number of patients who stop treatment because of LMWH side-effects is unknown. Objectives To evaluate the continuation rate and complications of daily LMWH injections in patients with cancer-associated VTE. Methods Consecutive patients with active cancer and objectively confirmed symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, treated at three Dutch hospitals and one Spanish hospital, were included to evaluate continuation LMWH therapy during LMWH treatment. Patients were excluded when they received other anticoagulants, were lost to follow-up, or experienced a venous catheter-associated thrombosis. Results A total of 372 patients were analyzed during LMWH treatment for a maximum of 180 days. The cumulative incidence of discontinuation was 21% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-25) after a median period of 90 days (interquartile range 60-120 days). Only female sex was found to be significantly associated with premature LMWH discontinuation (odds ratio 1.6; 95% CI 1.03-2.5). Thirty patients (8.1%) developed recurrent VTE, 30 patients (8.3%) suffered a major bleed, and 106 patients (28%) died. Conclusion Our study reveals that one of five patients with cancer-associated VTE stopped LMWH injections because of side-effects. This finding provides relevant background information for current clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants as compared with LMWH.
© 2016 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; low molecular weight heparin; patient adherence; patient compliance; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28012224     DOI: 10.1111/jth.13563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  11 in total

Review 1.  Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Cancer: Practical Considerations for the Management of Patients with Nausea or Vomiting.

Authors:  Hanno Riess; Cihan Ay; Rupert Bauersachs; Cecilia Becattini; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Francis Cajfinger; Ian Chau; Alexander T Cohen; Alok A Khorana; Anthony Maraveyas; Marcos Renni; Annie M Young
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 2.  Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients: a Summary of Pitfalls to Avoid.

Authors:  Harsh K Patel; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  When can we stop anticoagulation in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis?

Authors:  Agnes Y Y Lee
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

4.  Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Yi Wang; Rui-Lian Ma; Ming Liu; Jun-Zhen Gao; Wu-Yun Su; Li Yan; Jian-Jun Sun
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Endovascular Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in the Oncologic Patient Population.

Authors:  Sirish A Kishore; Raazi Bajwa; Layla Van Doren; Cy Wilkins; Gerard J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) as an Alternative Treatment Option in Tumor-Related Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Robert Klamroth; Stephan Kreher; Florian Langer; Axel Matzdorff; Hanno Riess
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Risk of recurrence and bleeding in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism treated with rivaroxaban: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Mette Søgaard; Peter Brønnum Nielsen; Flemming Skjøth; Jette Nordstrøm Kjaeldgaard; Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Higher Adherence to Treatment With Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin Nadroparin Than Enoxaparin Because of Side Effects in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sake J van der Wall; Frederikus A Klok; Paul L den Exter; Deisy Barrios; Raquel Morillo; Suzanne C Cannegieter; David Jimenez; Menno V Huisman
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2018-02-02

9.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer with direct oral anticoagulants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hailong Chen; Rui Tao; Hui Zhao; Jianjun Jiang; Jin Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Cancer-Associated ThrOmboSIs - Patient-Reported OutcoMes With RivarOxaban (COSIMO) - Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Anthony Maraveyas; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Agnes Y Lee; Lorenzo G Mantovani; Yoriko De Sanctis; Khaled Abdelgawwad; Samuel Fatoba; Miriam Bach; Alexander T Cohen
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.