Literature DB >> 28011836

New insights from a computational model on the relation between pacing site and CRT response.

Marieke Pluijmert1,2, Peter H M Bovendeerd2, Joost Lumens1, Kevin Vernooy3, Frits W Prinzen1, T Delhaas4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) produces clinical benefits in chronic heart failure patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB). The position of the pacing site on the left ventricle (LV) is considered an important determinant of CRT response, but the mechanism how the LV pacing site determines CRT response is not completely understood. The objective of this study is to investigate the relation between LV pacing site during biventricular (BiV) pacing and cardiac function. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We used a finite element model of BiV electromechanics. Cardiac function, assessed as LV dp/dtmax and stroke work, was evaluated during normal electrical activation, typical LBBB, fascicular blocks and BiV pacing with different LV pacing sites. The model replicated clinical observations such as increase of LV dp/dtmax and stroke work, and the disappearance of a septal flash during BiV pacing. The largest hemodynamic response was achieved when BiV pacing led to best resynchronization of LV electrical activation but this did not coincide with reduction in total BiV activation time (∼ QRS duration). Maximum response was achieved when pacing the mid-basal lateral wall and this was close to the latest activated region during intrinsic activation in the typical LBBB, but not in the fascicular block simulations.
CONCLUSIONS: In these model simulations, the best cardiac function was obtained when pacing the mid-basal LV lateral wall, because of fastest recruitment of LV activation. This study illustrates how computer modeling can shed new light on optimizing pacing therapies for CRT. The results from this study may help to design new clinical studies to further investigate the importance of the pacing site for CRT response. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biventricular pacing; Eikonal; Finite element; Mathematical modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011836     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  7 in total

1.  Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy based on a cardiac electromechanics-perfusion computational model.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Jenny S Choy; Farshad Raissi; Ghassan S Kassab; Lik Chuan Lee
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Simultaneous and Sequential Multi-Point Pacing in Heart Failure Patients With an Expected Higher Rate of Sub-response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results of Multicenter SYNSEQ Study.

Authors:  Maciej Sterliński; Joanna Zakrzewska-Koperska; Aleksander Maciąg; Adam Sokal; Joaquin Osca-Asensi; Lingwei Wang; Vasiliki Spyropoulou; Baerbel Maus; Francesca Lemme; Osita Okafor; Berthold Stegemann; Richard Cornelussen; Francisco Leyva
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  An accurate, robust, and efficient finite element framework with applications to anisotropic, nearly and fully incompressible elasticity.

Authors:  Elias Karabelas; Matthias A F Gsell; Gundolf Haase; Gernot Plank; Christoph M Augustin
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.756

Review 4.  Clinical Applications of Patient-Specific Models: The Case for a Simple Approach.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Holmes; Joost Lumens
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Computational Modeling for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Angela W C Lee; Caroline Mendonca Costa; Marina Strocchi; Christopher A Rinaldi; Steven A Niederer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Computational models in cardiology.

Authors:  Steven A Niederer; Joost Lumens; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Long-Term Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Apical Versus Nonapical Left Ventricular Pacing.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva; Abbasin Zegard; Robin J Taylor; Paul W X Foley; Fraz Umar; Kiran Patel; Jonathan Panting; Peter van Dam; Frits W Prinzen; Howard Marshall; Tian Qiu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.