Literature DB >> 28011805

Climate change and human health: what are the research trends? A scoping review protocol.

Niamh Herlihy1, Avner Bar-Hen1,2, Glenn Verner1,3, Helen Fischer4, Rainer Sauerborn5, Anneliese Depoux1,6, Antoine Flahault1,7, Stefanie Schütte1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: For 28 years, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been assessing the potential risks associated with anthropogenic climate change. Although interest in climate change and health is growing, the implications arising from their interaction remain understudied. Generating a greater understanding of the health impacts of climate change could be key step in inciting some of the changes necessary to decelerate global warming. A long-term and broad overview of the existing scientific literature in the field of climate change and health is currently missing in order to ensure that all priority areas are being adequately addressed. In this paper we outline our methods to conduct a scoping review of the published peer-reviewed literature on climate change and health between 1990 and 2015. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A detailed search strategy will be used to search the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria will be applied in order to capture the most relevant literature in the time frame chosen. Data will be extracted, categorised and coded to allow for statistical analysis of the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval was required for this study. A searchable database of climate change and health publications will be developed and a manuscript will be complied for publication and dissemination of the findings. We anticipate that this study will allow us to map the trends observed in publications over the 25-year time period in climate change and health research. It will also identify the research areas with the highest volume of publications as well as highlight the research trends in climate change and health. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate Change; Global Health; Research Methods

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011805      PMCID: PMC5223655          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


The review will cover a comprehensive time frame of 25 years. Publications not restricted to any particular study type, geographical region or human health issue. The review will cover two databases focusing on English language results. Grey literature will not be included in the literature search but will include comments or opinion views published in peer-reviewed journals. The quality of publications captured will not be assessed.

Background

The phenomenon of climate change is a reality that is now universally acknowledged and better understood than it was in 1988 when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was formed by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). There is growing evidence to support the scientific theories indicating that climate change is adversely affecting human health. However, the impact of climate change on health is quite complex and the same factor may sometimes act as a cause and other times as an effect. The consequences of climate change are likely to lead to an increased demand on health services, which will require adaptation to the growing incidence of climate-related health issues. The need to identify and prevent adverse health impacts is rising to the forefront of climate change policy debates and is becoming a growing priority of the public health community.1

Introduction

For more than 28 years, the IPCC has been assessing the potential health risks associated with climate change.2 In the 6 years between 2009 and 2015, climate change has gone from being ‘the biggest global health threat of the 21st century’3 to potentially ‘the greatest global health opportunity of the 21st century’.4 To date, projections of the direction and scope of health consequences induced by climate change involve a degree of uncertainty, which makes it difficult to communicate scientific facts to policymakers or even to the general public.5 6 Clear information and communication about the health consequences are a critical factor to remove some of this uncertainty. This may also assist in elevating the importance of climate change to ensure that it is a high priority which receives sufficient commitment financially and politically. Climate change presents an enormous governance challenge, with a need for greater new integrated governance structures at national and international levels.7 Climate change and health is a growing area of research. There are direct and indirect mechanisms by which climate change affects our health resulting in numerous health outcomes. The 2014 IPCC report outlines the direct impact from extreme weather and indirect impacts through ecosystem-mediated effects and human system-mediated effects.8 Generating a greater understanding of these health impacts resulting from climate change could be a key step in inciting some of the changes necessary to decelerate global warming. There is a wide range of publications addressing various aspects of climate change and health. We have identified a number of systematic literature reviews which summarise the evidence of specific health impact related to climate change including nutrition, infectious diseases, etc.9–14 A scoping review by Hosking et al provides insights into how the published literature on climate change and health addresses the World Health Assembly (WHA) priority research areas for climate change and health as specified in 2008 and expanded on in 2009.15 This review is highly relevant in identifying the research relevant to the WHA priority areas; however, the results cover a brief 2-year of period 2008–2010. Each iteration of the IPCC report presents evidence from the scientific literature covering the 6–7 years prior to the year of publication with each report covering a different time period. The current literature is lacking a long-term overview of existing scientific literature which addresses all health outcomes in the field of climate change. We are seeking to fill this void through this scoping review covering 25 years of publications which address the extensive health issues affected by climate change. We will examine the historical trends and identify the research areas which are being addressed in scientific publications. This study will provide a more extensive and inclusive overview in comparison with previously published reports and reviews of the research areas.

Objectives and hypotheses

With this scoping literature review we aim to collate published academic literature on climate change and health. We will map the findings by categorising papers according to various indicators and to provide a thematic analysis of their content. The specific objectives are: To provide an overview of existing scientific articles over time regarding climate change and human health; To build a database of existing scientific papers that explore climate change and health from 1990 to 2015 and to categorise them according to specified criteria; To make recommendations based on the research trends observed and prospective areas for future research. This work may also be a useful resource for future funding projects underlining the need for research in certain areas. Table 1 outlines the research questions to be addressed in undertaking this review.
Table 1

Research questions for ‘climate change and health’ scoping review

Research questions

1. Which health effects are being studied?

Direct effects

Indirect effects

2. What is the geographical focus of the publications?

Africa

North America

South America

Antarctica

Asia

Australasia

Europe

3. What types of articles are published on the topic?

Original research

Review

Commentary/opinion

4. To whom is the corresponding author affiliated with?

Country

Institution

Research questions for ‘climate change and health’ scoping review 1. Which health effects are being studied? Direct effects Indirect effects 2. What is the geographical focus of the publications? Africa North America South America Antarctica Asia Australasia Europe 3. What types of articles are published on the topic? Original research Review Commentary/opinion 4. To whom is the corresponding author affiliated with? Country Institution

Method

Scoping review methodology

Scoping reviews are a relatively recent method of reviewing evidence-based research, particularly in health and also in other disciplines.16 There is no single definition of what a scoping review consists of. A frequently applied definition is that from Arksey and O'Malley,17 which states that the aim of a scoping review is to ‘map rapidly the key concepts underpinning a research area and the main sources and types of evidence available’. This scoping review framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005 will be applied for this study. There have been a number of studies since 2005, which enhance the initial framework and have advanced our understanding of this methodology and how to produce a more efficient and effective study.16 18 19 The key strength of the scoping review method as applied to our study is that it allows for the analysis of a broad research question. Climate change and health is a vast area of research and our intention is to map the breadth of the literature on this topic. The quality of the literature will not be assessed, which is a limitation of scoping reviews. Systematic reviews which have more refined research questions and narrower study parameters, generally result in fewer, more homogeneous citations which can be more efficiently assessed for quality. The large volume of diverse citations anticipated from our literature search will be compiled into a catalogued database. Reflecting on the experience of others and in the absence of official guidelines for scoping reviews, we will proceed with implementing the initial framework by Arksey and O'Malley and glean insights into the proceeding studies aimed at enhancing this methodology to guide us in developing this study.

Databases

The databases chosen for this review are PubMed and Web of Science. Through PubMed we access primarily publications in the field of medicine and life sciences. Web of Science is a multidisciplinary database, which will capture the non-clinical health aspects of the effects of climate change across a broad range of research areas.

Search strategy

The search strategy will include broad terms to cover all areas of climate change exposure and health outcomes affected by climate change. The search terms will be used to identify the literature that documents the human health impact of climate change. The keywords that will be used for building the search strategy are outlined in table 2 as well as the range of publication dates. This range dates back to the first report from the IPCC in 1990 to the end of 2015, just after the last Conference of Parties (COP21) to capture as much relevant literature as possible. The search strategy will consist of free text and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms.
Table 2

Search terms for ‘climate change and health’ scoping review

Climate change-related termsHealth-related termsDate of publication
Climate changeGlobal warmingClimate variabilityGreenhouse effectGHGEHealthDisease

Non-communicable

NCD

Communicable

EpidemiologyLifestyleCo-benefitsMortalityMorbidityNutritionMalnutritionDehydrationMigrationMental disorders
1990–2015

GHGE, greenhouse gas emissions; NCD, non-communicable disease.

Search terms for ‘climate change and health’ scoping review Non-communicable NCD Communicable GHGE, greenhouse gas emissions; NCD, non-communicable disease.

Search terms

The key search terms will be adapted according to the database. Table 3 below outlines the detailed search syntaxes that will be used to search each database.
Table 3

Search strategy syntax for databases

DatabaseSearch strategy syntax
PubMed(‘climate change’ [Title/Abstract] OR ‘global warming’ [Title/Abstract] OR ‘climate variability’ [Title/Abstract] OR ‘greenhouse effect’ [Title/Abstract] OR ‘GHGE’ [Title/Abstract]) AND ((‘health’ [MeSH Terms] OR ‘health’ [All Fields]) OR (‘disease’ [MeSH Terms] OR ‘disease’ [All Fields]) OR (‘Communicable’ [All Fields]) OR (‘Non-Communicable Disease’ [All Fields]) OR (‘NCD’ [All Fields]) OR (‘Lifestyle’ [All Fields]) OR (‘Co-Benefits’ [All Fields]) OR (‘epidemiology’ [Subheading] OR ‘epidemiology’ [All Fields] OR ‘morbidity’ [All Fields] OR ‘morbidity’ [MeSH Terms]) OR (‘mortality’ [Subheading] OR ‘mortality’ [All Fields] OR ‘mortality’ [MeSH Terms]) OR (‘nutritional status’ [MeSH Terms] OR (‘nutritional’ [All Fields] AND ‘status’ [All Fields]) OR ‘nutritional status’ [All Fields] OR ‘nutrition’ [All Fields] OR ‘nutritional sciences’ [MeSH Terms] OR (‘nutritional’ [All Fields] AND ‘sciences’ [All Fields]) OR ‘nutritional sciences’ [All Fields]) OR (‘malnutrition’ [MeSH Terms] OR ‘malnutrition’ [All Fields]) OR (‘dehydration’ [MeSH Terms] OR ‘dehydration’ [All Fields]) OR ‘emigration and immigration’ [All Fields] OR ‘mental disorder’ [All Fields]) AND (‘1990/01/01’ [PDAT]: ‘2015/12/31’ [PDAT])
Web of ScienceTI=((‘climate change’ OR ‘global warming’ OR ‘climate variability’ OR ‘greenhouse effect’ OR ‘GHGE’)) AND TS= ((‘health’ OR ‘disease’ OR ‘Communicable’ OR ‘Non-Communicable Disease’ OR ‘NCD’ OR ‘Lifestyle’ OR ‘Co-Benefits’ OR ‘epidemiology’ OR ‘morbidity’ OR ‘nutritional status’ OR (‘nutritional’ AND ‘status’) OR ‘nutritional status’ OR ‘nutrit*’ OR ‘nutritional sciences’ OR (‘nutritional’AND ‘sciences’) OR ‘malnutrition’ OR ‘dehydration’ OR (‘emigration AND immigration’) OR ‘mental disorder’))

MeSH, Medical Subject Headings.

Search strategy syntax for databases MeSH, Medical Subject Headings.

Criteria for inclusion and exclusion

Table 4 below outlines the inclusion and exclusion criteria that will be used to conduct the literature review.
Table 4

Inclusion and exclusion criteria for scoping review

Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria

Peer-reviewed articles (including original quantitative and qualitative studies, systematic reviews, editorials, viewpoints)

Indexed in PubMed and/or Web of Science databases

Published between 1990 and 2015

Focus on climate change and human health

Publications in English only

No restriction to country or population

Book chapters and grey literature (dissertations, conference proceedings, reports, etc).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria for scoping review Peer-reviewed articles (including original quantitative and qualitative studies, systematic reviews, editorials, viewpoints) Indexed in PubMed and/or Web of Science databases Published between 1990 and 2015 Focus on climate change and human health Publications in English only No restriction to country or population Book chapters and grey literature (dissertations, conference proceedings, reports, etc).

Literature selection

First, two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts of identified papers for relevance to the topic. Those articles considered not to be relevant on the grounds of topic will be excluded. Second, full text/papers will be sought for all studies appearing to meet the inclusion criteria and a final selection will be made. If the two reviewers cannot reach an agreement, a third reviewer will be involved. A flow chart will be produced to report the selection process.

Data collection and extraction

Screening of studies for eligibility

Results will be merged using citation software EndNote and duplicates will be removed. Data will be extracted from the studies identified using the software R. The data will then be transferred into an Excel file and coded to facilitate analytics and the development of infographics. A second researcher will independently check the data for accuracy and detail. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or by consulting a third reviewer. A flow chart of the study selection procedure at each stage of the review will be prepared, detailing when exclusion occurred and the reasons for exclusion.

Ethics and dissemination

No ethical approval was required for this literature-based study. The extraction and categorisation of publications for climate change and health will provide a long-term overview of the published literature in this area. This may be, to the best of our knowledge and if no other group undertakes the same work simultaneously, the first study of its kind to provide such an overview. We will build an open searchable database of our findings, which will be updated over time and serve as a useful source of information for researchers working in this field. The coding of our results will allow for analysis of publications in the various categories. We intend to write a manuscript for the publication of our analysis to disseminate our findings. This study will map the trends observed in publications over a 25-year time period. It will also identify the research areas with the highest volume of publications as well as highlight the research trends in climate change and health. The database will be part of a Climate Change and Health Resource that will be available on the Centre Virchow-Villermé’s (CVV) website. This study of the academic literature is one axis of a larger overall study on the communication of climate change and health. Other axes include reviews of national legislation and print media to better understand the role of the health argument in the climate change discourse. The Climate Change and Health Resource will also contain links to Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) that have been produced by the CVV on the topic and other related MOOCs produced elsewhere. The database will therefore serve to complement the other information resources across different disciplines addressing climate change and health.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of current efforts to quantify the impacts of climate change on undernutrition.

Authors:  Revati K Phalkey; Clara Aranda-Jan; Sabrina Marx; Bernhard Höfle; Rainer Sauerborn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission.

Authors:  Anthony Costello; Mustafa Abbas; Adriana Allen; Sarah Ball; Sarah Bell; Richard Bellamy; Sharon Friel; Nora Groce; Anne Johnson; Maria Kett; Maria Lee; Caren Levy; Mark Maslin; David McCoy; Bill McGuire; Hugh Montgomery; David Napier; Christina Pagel; Jinesh Patel; Jose Antonio Puppim de Oliveira; Nanneke Redclift; Hannah Rees; Daniel Rogger; Joanne Scott; Judith Stephenson; John Twigg; Jonathan Wolff; Craig Patterson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Health, Climate Change and Sustainability: A systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  A Nichols; V Maynard; B Goodman; J Richardson
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2009-08-24

4.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.

Authors:  Danielle Levac; Heather Colquhoun; Kelly K O'Brien
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Building human resilience: the role of public health preparedness and response as an adaptation to climate change.

Authors:  Mark E Keim
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Climate change and health: on the latest IPCC report.

Authors:  Alistair Woodward; Kirk R Smith; Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum; Dave D Chadee; Yasushi Honda; Qiyong Liu; Jane Olwoch; Boris Revich; Rainer Sauerborn; Zoë Chafe; Ulisses Confalonieri; Andy Haines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  How well does climate change and human health research match the demands of policymakers? A scoping review.

Authors:  Jamie Hosking; Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Projecting future heat-related mortality under climate change scenarios: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cunrui Huang; Adrian Gerard Barnett; Xiaoming Wang; Pavla Vaneckova; Gerard FitzGerald; Shilu Tong
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Simple messages help set the record straight about scientific agreement on human-caused climate change: the results of two experiments.

Authors:  Teresa A Myers; Edward Maibach; Ellen Peters; Anthony Leiserowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Making the links: do we connect climate change with health? A qualitative case study from Canada.

Authors:  Francesca S Cardwell; Susan J Elliott
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  7 in total

1.  Countering the Curse of Dimensionality: Exploring Data-generating Mechanisms Through Participant Observation and Mechanistic Modeling.

Authors:  Alan Hubbard; James Trostle; Ivan Cangemi; Joseph N S Eisenberg
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  Health Interventions for Preventing Climate-Sensitive Diseases: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Rafaella Pessoa Moreira; Francisco Breno Barbosa de Oliveira; Thelma Leite de Araujo; Huana Carolina Candido Morais; Tahissa Frota Cavalcante; Maria Begoña Sanchez Gomez; Janiel Ferreira Felício; Glauciano de Oliveira Ferreira
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.801

3.  A gaping research gap regarding the climate change impact on health in poor countries.

Authors:  Rainer Sauerborn
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  Scoping Review of Climate Change and Health Research in the Philippines: A Complementary Tool in Research Agenda-Setting.

Authors:  Paul Lester Chua; Miguel Manuel Dorotan; Jemar Anne Sigua; Rafael Deo Estanislao; Masahiro Hashizume; Miguel Antonio Salazar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Comparing Economics, Environmental Pollution and Health Efficiency in China.

Authors:  Zhen Shi; Fengping Wu; Huinan Huang; Xinrui Sun; Lina Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Health and well-being in small island communities: a cross-sectional study in the Solomon Islands.

Authors:  Takuro Furusawa; Freda Pitakaka; Spencer Gabriel; Akira Sai; Takahiro Tsukahara; Takafumi Ishida
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  The effects on public health of climate change adaptation responses: a systematic review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Pauline F D Scheelbeek; Alan D Dangour; Stephanie Jarmul; Grace Turner; Anne J Sietsma; Jan C Minx; Max Callaghan; Idowu Ajibade; Stephanie E Austin; Robbert Biesbroek; Kathryn J Bowen; Tara Chen; Katy Davis; Tim Ensor; James D Ford; Eranga K Galappaththi; Elphin T Joe; Issah J Musah-Surugu; Gabriela Nagle Alverio; Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle; Pratik Pokharel; Eunice A Salubi; Giulia Scarpa; Alcade C Segnon; Mariella Siña; Sienna Templeman; Jiren Xu; Carol Zavaleta-Cortijo; Lea Berrang-Ford
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.793

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.